Bitcoin Forum>Other>Archival
Author

Topic: . (Read 2216 times)

minerjones
legendary
Activity: 3206
Merit: 3596
.
June 08, 2016, 09:56:08 PM
#53

Yes, this was a tough decision, but I have decided on the winner based on this:

Quote from: BitcoinPenny on June 07, 2016, 05:16:45 PM
Yeah, I'm on the fence about it. The OP states "bid increment," not "minimum bid increment." To me, that means the bids must be in increments of .01 BTC (in other words, all bids must be divisible by .01 BTC), and a bid of .541 BTC doesn't qualify. (And if that's the case, then that means the previous valid bid of .54 BTC may have won the auction.)

Regardless, the last thing I want is bad blood. This is a fun and friendly auction, after all.

And will contact them via PM.
They can post if they would like.

Thanks.
DebitMe
legendary
Activity: 2800
Merit: 1012
Get Paid Crypto To Walk or Drive
Re: .
June 08, 2016, 11:24:21 PM
#49
Congrats to the winner, I got working and preoccupied so my bidding forgot about unfortunately.  Anyway, good auction.  Need to get my hands on an orange one here soon.
BitcoinPenny
legendary
Activity: 2676
Merit: 2203
BitcoinPenny.com
Re: .
June 08, 2016, 10:00:22 AM
#48
It's a tough decision for minerjones, to be sure. I wouldn't want to be in his position. Smiley That said, with the permission of minerjones, I will officially withdraw my bid of .55 BTC. Dogevisitor can have the auction at .541 BTC. No worries, no hard feelings. I'll find another set down the road. Congratulations, DV! Smiley

Regards,
Chris
chronicsky
legendary
Activity: 2828
Merit: 1222
Just looking for peace
Re: .
June 08, 2016, 06:47:23 AM
#47
That was a good tactic indeed but it was kind of foul play
I wouldn't support it Smiley
Rest upto MJ

No hard feelings towards you @Dogevisitor
It's just what i think is good since we are all good Bitcoiners and numismatics Smiley
Fortify
legendary
Activity: 2688
Merit: 1192
Re: .
June 08, 2016, 03:30:02 AM
#46
Quote from: dogevisitor on June 08, 2016, 03:25:49 AM
Quote from: Fortify on June 08, 2016, 03:22:20 AM
It's up to minerjones of course, but BitcoinPenny should of won this auction really. Bid increments are multiples of 0.01 - the bid of 0.541 is the same as bidding 0.54. I only say this because I tried the same tactic in a different auction Tongue

I don't see "multiples" in this auction, only increments, which is different.


Well if you are working to the word of the rules, all bids that didn't increment by 0.01 are invalid - which is clearly not the intention in an auction. Bidding an unsupported increment would make your bid equally invalid.
dogevisitor
sr. member
Activity: 351
Merit: 250
Re: .
June 08, 2016, 03:28:28 AM
#45
Quote from: dogevisitor on June 08, 2016, 03:25:49 AM
Quote from: Fortify on June 08, 2016, 03:22:20 AM
It's up to minerjones of course, but BitcoinPenny should of won this auction really. Bid increments are multiples of 0.01 - the bid of 0.541 is the same as bidding 0.54. I only say this because I tried the same tactic in a different auction Tongue

I don't see "multiples" in this auction, only increments, which is different.


I don't want to argue regarding spelling or whatever...
We are gents here and the OP it's always right Wink
dogevisitor
sr. member
Activity: 351
Merit: 250
Re: .
June 08, 2016, 03:25:49 AM
#44
Quote from: Fortify on June 08, 2016, 03:22:20 AM
It's up to minerjones of course, but BitcoinPenny should of won this auction really. Bid increments are multiples of 0.01 - the bid of 0.541 is the same as bidding 0.54. I only say this because I tried the same tactic in a different auction Tongue

I don't see "multiples" in this auction, only increments, which is different.
Fortify
legendary
Activity: 2688
Merit: 1192
Re: .
June 08, 2016, 03:22:20 AM
#43
It's up to minerjones of course, but BitcoinPenny should of won this auction really. Bid increments are multiples of 0.01 - the bid of 0.541 is the same as bidding 0.54. I only say this because I tried the same tactic in a different auction Tongue
BitcoinPenny
legendary
Activity: 2676
Merit: 2203
BitcoinPenny.com
Re: .
June 07, 2016, 05:43:09 PM
#42
Quote from: dogevisitor on June 07, 2016, 05:36:56 PM
If I'm the winner and if I ever think on selling this set you will be the first one I will ask and the price will be my winning bid. Wink

It's gestures like the one above that make me happy to be part of such a great forum. You're a good one, dogevisitor. Smiley

Regards,
Chris
dogevisitor
sr. member
Activity: 351
Merit: 250
Re: .
June 07, 2016, 05:38:48 PM
#41
It was a fun auction!
dogevisitor
sr. member
Activity: 351
Merit: 250
Re: .
June 07, 2016, 05:36:56 PM
#40
Quote from: BitcoinPenny on June 07, 2016, 05:16:45 PM
Quote from: digicoinuser on June 07, 2016, 04:41:17 PM
Dang, that was a good tactic by doge to make the minimum acceptable bid after his 0.551BTC.

It's really up to the person running the auction but I believe doge won based on bid invalidation.   Wink

Yeah, I'm on the fence about it. The OP states "bid increment," not "minimum bid increment." To me, that means the bids must be in increments of .01 BTC (in other words, all bids must be divisible by .01 BTC), and a bid of .541 BTC doesn't qualify. (And if that's the case, then that means the previous valid bid of .54 BTC may have won the auction.)

Regardless, the last thing I want is bad blood. This is a fun and friendly auction, after all.

Congratulations, dogevisitor. Smiley

Me


We have to wait minerjones to declare the winning bid.

If we take "bid increment" as is, then a bid with a difference of 0.02, from previus bid, would be invalid too.
In that case lots of bids would be invalid here.

If I'm the winner and if I ever think on selling this set you will be the first one I will ask and the price will be my winning bid. Wink

BitcoinPenny
legendary
Activity: 2676
Merit: 2203
BitcoinPenny.com
Re: .
June 07, 2016, 05:16:45 PM
#39
Quote from: digicoinuser on June 07, 2016, 04:41:17 PM
Dang, that was a good tactic by doge to make the minimum acceptable bid after his 0.551BTC.

It's really up to the person running the auction but I believe doge won based on bid invalidation.   Wink

Yeah, I'm on the fence about it. The OP states "bid increment," not "minimum bid increment." To me, that means the bids must be in increments of .01 BTC (in other words, all bids must be divisible by .01 BTC), and a bid of .541 BTC doesn't qualify. (And if that's the case, then that means the previous valid bid of .54 BTC may have won the auction.)

Regardless, the last thing I want is bad blood. This is a fun and friendly auction, after all.

Congratulations, dogevisitor. Smiley

Me
dogevisitor
sr. member
Activity: 351
Merit: 250
Re: .
June 07, 2016, 04:47:35 PM
#38
Quote from: BitcoinPenny on June 07, 2016, 04:32:22 PM
Quote from: BitcoinPenny on June 07, 2016, 04:31:13 PM
Quote from: dogevisitor on June 07, 2016, 04:29:58 PM
Quote from: BitcoinPenny on June 07, 2016, 04:14:16 PM
.55

bid increment: 0.01BTC

I think I won this!

I'm lost...

Me

Oh, I see what you did. I didn't think the extra .001 BTC counted, since the increments were .01 BTC.

Me

Sorry for this!
digicoinuser
legendary
Activity: 2702
Merit: 1072
Re: .
June 07, 2016, 04:41:17 PM
#37
Quote from: BitcoinPenny on June 07, 2016, 04:32:22 PM
Quote from: BitcoinPenny on June 07, 2016, 04:31:13 PM
Quote from: dogevisitor on June 07, 2016, 04:29:58 PM
Quote from: BitcoinPenny on June 07, 2016, 04:14:16 PM
.55

bid increment: 0.01BTC

I think I won this!

I'm lost...

Me

Oh, I see what you did. I didn't think the extra .001 BTC counted, since the increments were .01 BTC.

Me

Dang, that was a good tactic by doge to make the minimum acceptable bid after his 0.551BTC.

It's really up to the person running the auction but I believe doge won based on bid invalidation.   Wink
cryptoheadd
hero member
Activity: 1022
Merit: 501
Re: .
June 07, 2016, 04:33:52 PM
#36
Quote from: dogevisitor on June 07, 2016, 04:29:58 PM
Quote from: BitcoinPenny on June 07, 2016, 04:14:16 PM
.55

bid increment: 0.01BTC

I think I won this!

I see what you did there.  Grin
BitcoinPenny
legendary
Activity: 2676
Merit: 2203
BitcoinPenny.com
Re: .
June 07, 2016, 04:32:22 PM
#35
Quote from: BitcoinPenny on June 07, 2016, 04:31:13 PM
Quote from: dogevisitor on June 07, 2016, 04:29:58 PM
Quote from: BitcoinPenny on June 07, 2016, 04:14:16 PM
.55

bid increment: 0.01BTC

I think I won this!

I'm lost...

Me

Oh, I see what you did. I didn't think the extra .001 BTC counted, since the increments were .01 BTC.

Me
BitcoinPenny
legendary
Activity: 2676
Merit: 2203
BitcoinPenny.com
Re: .
June 07, 2016, 04:31:13 PM
#34
Quote from: dogevisitor on June 07, 2016, 04:29:58 PM
Quote from: BitcoinPenny on June 07, 2016, 04:14:16 PM
.55

bid increment: 0.01BTC

I think I won this!

I'm lost...

Me
dogevisitor
sr. member
Activity: 351
Merit: 250
Re: .
June 07, 2016, 04:29:58 PM
#33
Quote from: BitcoinPenny on June 07, 2016, 04:14:16 PM
.55

bid increment: 0.01BTC

I think I won this!
BitcoinPenny
legendary
Activity: 2676
Merit: 2203
BitcoinPenny.com
Re: .
June 07, 2016, 04:14:16 PM
#32
.55
dogevisitor
sr. member
Activity: 351
Merit: 250
Re: .
June 07, 2016, 04:13:51 PM
#31
0.541
BitcoinPenny
legendary
Activity: 2676
Merit: 2203
BitcoinPenny.com
Re: .
June 07, 2016, 04:00:53 PM
#30
.53
dogevisitor
sr. member
Activity: 351
Merit: 250
Re: .
June 07, 2016, 03:53:01 PM
#29
0.52
BitcoinPenny
legendary
Activity: 2676
Merit: 2203
BitcoinPenny.com
Re: .
June 07, 2016, 03:49:25 PM
#28
.51
dogevisitor
sr. member
Activity: 351
Merit: 250
Re: .
June 07, 2016, 03:38:36 PM
#27
0.5
BitcoinPenny
legendary
Activity: 2676
Merit: 2203
BitcoinPenny.com
Re: .
June 07, 2016, 03:36:55 PM
#26
.42

Me
dogevisitor
sr. member
Activity: 351
Merit: 250
Re: .
June 07, 2016, 03:23:38 PM
#25
0.41
DebitMe
legendary
Activity: 2800
Merit: 1012
Get Paid Crypto To Walk or Drive
Re: .
June 07, 2016, 03:20:02 PM
#24
.4
dogevisitor
sr. member
Activity: 351
Merit: 250
Re: .
June 07, 2016, 03:14:20 PM
#23
0.36
BitcoinPenny
legendary
Activity: 2676
Merit: 2203
BitcoinPenny.com
Re: .
June 07, 2016, 03:11:41 PM
#22
Take it. Undecided

Me
DebitMe
legendary
Activity: 2800
Merit: 1012
Get Paid Crypto To Walk or Drive
Re: .
June 07, 2016, 03:09:37 PM
#21
.35
BitcoinPenny
legendary
Activity: 2676
Merit: 2203
BitcoinPenny.com
Re: .
June 07, 2016, 03:08:54 PM
#20
.26

Me
DebitMe
legendary
Activity: 2800
Merit: 1012
Get Paid Crypto To Walk or Drive
Re: .
June 07, 2016, 03:00:47 PM
#19
.25
Fortify
legendary
Activity: 2688
Merit: 1192
Re: .
June 07, 2016, 02:59:49 PM
#18
0.19
dogevisitor
sr. member
Activity: 351
Merit: 250
Re: .
June 07, 2016, 02:48:35 PM
#17
0.18 BTC
Fortify
legendary
Activity: 2688
Merit: 1192
Re: .
June 07, 2016, 02:44:31 PM
#16
0.17
minerjones
legendary
Activity: 3206
Merit: 3596
Re: .
June 07, 2016, 12:12:38 PM
#16
Quote from: DebitMe on June 07, 2016, 11:41:32 AM
.14

ENDS in 3 hours

This is a steal!!!! Cheesy
monkeynuts
legendary
Activity: 1252
Merit: 1259
MONKEYNUTS
Re: .
June 07, 2016, 02:30:55 PM
#15
0.16
minerjones
legendary
Activity: 3206
Merit: 3596
Re: .
June 05, 2016, 10:54:10 AM
#14
Quote from: Fortify on June 03, 2016, 03:43:34 PM
.13

Current High bid.

A little over 2 days left....
BitcoinPenny
legendary
Activity: 2676
Merit: 2203
BitcoinPenny.com
Re: .
June 07, 2016, 02:25:08 PM
#14
I'll bid .15 BTC. Wink

Regards,
Me
DebitMe
legendary
Activity: 2800
Merit: 1012
Get Paid Crypto To Walk or Drive
Re: .
June 07, 2016, 11:41:32 AM
#13
.14
Fortify
legendary
Activity: 2688
Merit: 1192
Re: .
June 03, 2016, 03:43:34 PM
#12
.13
IBGigglin
legendary
Activity: 910
Merit: 1006
BCH Advocate.
Re: .
June 03, 2016, 12:11:45 AM
#11
.12BTC
DebitMe
legendary
Activity: 2800
Merit: 1012
Get Paid Crypto To Walk or Drive
Re: .
June 02, 2016, 11:08:42 PM
#10
.11
cryptoheadd
hero member
Activity: 1022
Merit: 501
Re: .
June 02, 2016, 05:45:34 PM
#9
0.1BTC
Fortify
legendary
Activity: 2688
Merit: 1192
Re: .
June 02, 2016, 05:38:16 PM
#8
0.09
cryptoheadd
hero member
Activity: 1022
Merit: 501
Re: .
June 02, 2016, 04:49:37 PM
#7
0.08
Jog4444
sr. member
Activity: 266
Merit: 250
SEIZED by Gunthar
Re: .
June 02, 2016, 04:47:24 PM
#6
0.06BTC
cryptoheadd
hero member
Activity: 1022
Merit: 501
Re: .
June 02, 2016, 04:41:06 PM
#5
0.05BTC
minerjones
legendary
Activity: 3206
Merit: 3596
Re: .
June 02, 2016, 04:40:43 PM
#5
If this gets above 0.5BTC, I may be tempted to add an orange label coin to sweeten the deal.....
Just an idea.
Please no comments

Thanks.
Jog4444
sr. member
Activity: 266
Merit: 250
SEIZED by Gunthar
Re: .
June 02, 2016, 04:38:36 PM
#4
0.03BTC
MRBONG411
hero member
Activity: 639
Merit: 500
Re: .
June 02, 2016, 01:49:39 PM
#3
0.02BTC
cryptoheadd
hero member
Activity: 1022
Merit: 501
Re: .
June 02, 2016, 09:09:54 AM
#2
0.01
minerjones
legendary
Activity: 3206
Merit: 3596
Re: .
June 02, 2016, 08:58:36 AM
#1
.
Bitcoin Forum>Other>Archival
Jump to: