Topic: 《中国日报》谈贾敬龙案：对死刑有质疑应暂缓执行 (Read 417 times)
在法律所不能及的模糊地界就是世道民心之所在。
不管怎么样，人命死了就无法挽回，只要有异议，就应该再好好审审
杀人偿命，欠债还钱，亘古不变。他不死的话，死者儿子是不是要替父报仇啊？杀父之仇不共戴天。
社论：贾敬龙应暂缓执行死刑
近日河北贾敬龙杀人案核准死刑引发争议，多位法学界学者与律师呼吁，贾敬龙罪不至死。案件的起因和贾敬龙自首的认定是影响量刑的两大因素，而从这两项因素看，贾敬龙案具有法定从轻理由。
英文原文：Doubts over death sentence should delay its execution
A gavel in a court。 [Photo/IC]
Jia Jinglong is to be executed anytime soon， after he and his attorney were reportedly informed of the Supreme People‘s Court’s approval of his death sentence。
We are not in the position to call a halt。 Yet we feel strongly that the order must not be carried out。 Not because social media are rife with cries against the ruling。 But because the circumstances are anything but normal， and there are some outstanding questions that need to be properly answered。 Legal experts， from professors to lawyers， deem the sentence problematic。
Jia shot and killed the head of his village in 2013， and he was convicted of murder。 His death sentence is controversial， though， for the murder was a reaction to the ruthless， illicit forced demolition of his home that the victim allegedly masterminded。
Legal professionals have argued that Jia qualifies for a lesser sentence， a reprieve for instance， as he tried to turn himself in and confess to police afterwards。
Considering both the judicial authorities‘ new emphasis on prudence in applying the death penalty， and the reasonable doubts surrounding the sentence， we urge the court to demonstrate discretion， and avoid the double tragedy to which we are dangerously close。
Whatever happens， Jia‘s case should not be allowed to slip away as if it were just another regular criminal offense。 Because it is not。 Outside the courtroom， there are pricey lessons to be learnt。
“I am a victim。。。from the very beginning，” Jia told the first-instance court in self-defense。 “I would not have embarked on such a road of no return had there been a way out。”
The murder took place months after his home was demolished by force。 He called the police in the vain hope of stopping the demolition。 He tried to negotiate for compensation afterwards。 He lodged complaints to local authorities。 He found himself helpless， hopeless， with no way to have justice done。
As in many similar cases， Jia used to be an ordinary citizen concerned primarily about living a normal life。 Like others who ended up desperate， vengeful and hurting themselves and others to have their injustices noticed， Jia would probably not have acted as he did if his loss had been properly taken care of。
When residents are victimized by those who have power in their hand， they should not be deprived of the hope of having their wrongs addressed and justice delivered。
近日河北贾敬龙杀人案核准死刑引发争议，多位法学界学者与律师呼吁，贾敬龙罪不至死。案件的起因和贾敬龙自首的认定是影响量刑的两大因素，而从这两项因素看，贾敬龙案具有法定从轻理由。
英文原文：Doubts over death sentence should delay its execution
A gavel in a court。 [Photo/IC]
Jia Jinglong is to be executed anytime soon， after he and his attorney were reportedly informed of the Supreme People‘s Court’s approval of his death sentence。
We are not in the position to call a halt。 Yet we feel strongly that the order must not be carried out。 Not because social media are rife with cries against the ruling。 But because the circumstances are anything but normal， and there are some outstanding questions that need to be properly answered。 Legal experts， from professors to lawyers， deem the sentence problematic。
Jia shot and killed the head of his village in 2013， and he was convicted of murder。 His death sentence is controversial， though， for the murder was a reaction to the ruthless， illicit forced demolition of his home that the victim allegedly masterminded。
Legal professionals have argued that Jia qualifies for a lesser sentence， a reprieve for instance， as he tried to turn himself in and confess to police afterwards。
Considering both the judicial authorities‘ new emphasis on prudence in applying the death penalty， and the reasonable doubts surrounding the sentence， we urge the court to demonstrate discretion， and avoid the double tragedy to which we are dangerously close。
Whatever happens， Jia‘s case should not be allowed to slip away as if it were just another regular criminal offense。 Because it is not。 Outside the courtroom， there are pricey lessons to be learnt。
“I am a victim。。。from the very beginning，” Jia told the first-instance court in self-defense。 “I would not have embarked on such a road of no return had there been a way out。”
The murder took place months after his home was demolished by force。 He called the police in the vain hope of stopping the demolition。 He tried to negotiate for compensation afterwards。 He lodged complaints to local authorities。 He found himself helpless， hopeless， with no way to have justice done。
As in many similar cases， Jia used to be an ordinary citizen concerned primarily about living a normal life。 Like others who ended up desperate， vengeful and hurting themselves and others to have their injustices noticed， Jia would probably not have acted as he did if his loss had been properly taken care of。
When residents are victimized by those who have power in their hand， they should not be deprived of the hope of having their wrongs addressed and justice delivered。
Jump to: