Yay! 
Topic: . (Read 357 times)
The 2011 V2 is actually more rare then the error, is my understanding. Increasing the "rarity" factor is the grading mistake. Kind of unique and rare situation. Something went wrong with the first coin, and something went wrong with the second coin...not like theres a whole mess of factors that could go wrong....just production and grading. We have a situation of both here.
No offense Owl, you know I like the snott outta ya, but he asked our opinions....not what Ebay members are gonna think. But, in fairness...I can see your point too.
So it seems we are debating the "classification" of what constitutes an "error". Can a slab still be considered as part of an 'error", yes or no? I think so.
No offense Owl, you know I like the snott outta ya, but he asked our opinions....not what Ebay members are gonna think. But, in fairness...I can see your point too.
So it seems we are debating the "classification" of what constitutes an "error". Can a slab still be considered as part of an 'error", yes or no? I think so.
Thanks and yeah all good points indeed -
Another point of view could be last year's "2016 Sol Noctis" that graded MS69, and wasn't even real, or silver.
Still, it sold on here I'm quite sure...
I like you too Fattcatt, thanks, but I'm more OCD than you I suppose!
If it had been mine and more rare like you say, I probably would have had anacs fix it, even if I had messed up the submission form that may have helped cause the grading error, no matter how long it had been, but perhaps the owner bought it and noticed it later, who knows. Fun stuff these coins! 
Cheers.
The 2011 V2 is actually more rare then the error, is my understanding. Increasing the "rarity" factor is the grading mistake. Kind of unique and rare situation. Something went wrong with the first coin, and something went wrong with the second coin...not like theres a whole mess of factors that could go wrong....just production and grading. We have a situation of both here.
No offense Owl, you know I like the snott outta ya, but he asked our opinions....not what Ebay members are gonna think. But, in fairness...I can see your point too.
So it seems we are debating the "classification" of what constitutes an "error". Can a slab still be considered as part of an 'error", yes or no? I think so.
No offense Owl, you know I like the snott outta ya, but he asked our opinions....not what Ebay members are gonna think. But, in fairness...I can see your point too.
So it seems we are debating the "classification" of what constitutes an "error". Can a slab still be considered as part of an 'error", yes or no? I think so.
A screw up is a screw up, any way you shake it out. Definitely an Error.
The main problem I have with this "error" is that it could easily be resold on Ebay as a real error. And, I don't even know if an S2 non-error is worth more or less, but this is a grading error, not a real coin error like the 1st coin. If it were mine, I would have sent it back to get reslabbed/fixed. Whoever buys it cannot just do that, they will have to crack the slab and pay for a regrade, or keep it as is.
Jump to: