Author

Topic: . (Read 798 times)

legendary
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1057
Marketing manager - GO MP
.
December 21, 2013, 06:59:23 AM
#7
don't be delusional, really all it takes is 5 top pool ops.

If that happens it would turn out to be a tie, the longest chain would be in the new system but if the transactions aren't verified what good would it be? If the pool ops do that they risk destroying Bitcoins utility.
And Nodes can enforce the block size limit more easily than for example the number of coins since well in order to fill the blocks it takes transactions. Where are the mass of transactions come from?
sr. member
Activity: 308
Merit: 250
December 21, 2013, 06:56:12 AM
#6
Did you get the memo on TPS?



LOL! first thing what popped up with me also, best movie ever!

legendary
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1265
December 21, 2013, 06:54:14 AM
#5
Did you get the memo on TPS?

legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1010
Borsche
December 21, 2013, 06:51:39 AM
#4
don't be delusional, really all it takes is 5 top pool ops.
legendary
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1057
Marketing manager - GO MP
December 21, 2013, 06:20:59 AM
#3
The devs can work on whatever they want, but it won't change a thing if there are a sufficient amount of people who refuse to participate in the hard-fork.
legendary
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1057
Marketing manager - GO MP
December 21, 2013, 06:12:09 AM
#2
Some things can't be fixed, the transactions/second is one of them. The block size limit is a fixed economic resource just like the number of coins and it wouldn't be bitcoin anymore if it is changed in any way.
jr. member
Activity: 30
Merit: 501
Seek the truth
December 21, 2013, 06:09:57 AM
#1
.
Jump to: