I used to not be sure about the whole bitcoin cash/ bitcoin debate but after watching Roger Ver interviews I'm starting to be convinced that big blocks are the way to go.[/size]
why? just because Ver talks about benefits of having 32 MB blocks and doesn't mention any of the many downsides of it?
you don't have to be an expert to know BCH is useless. just go to a block explorer and look at the transactions and blocks. bitcoin has 4 MB blocks that are 100% full and is handling more than 2000 tx per block on average. while BCH has 32 MB blocks that are about 0.0006% full on average and handles about 5 tx per block.
it is like the world is already answering your question...
Bitcoincash might be closer to the actual whitepaper by Satoshi because of BCH having no SegWit, but still, NO. The real and original bitcoin will always be the coin that will have the $BTC ticker. With that said, as much as how I'm really thankful to what Roger Ver has done to help bitcoin in the past, I really hate how he advertises BCH as the "real bitcoin". Even calling BTC as bitcoin core. It's stupid.
1. the whitepaper mentions bitcoin is a decentralized payment system. BCH is not decentralized so it is the farthest from the paper.
2. ticker is not something that is set with consensus rules. it is set inside a centralized place called exchange platform and because of that it is not determining what is "real bitcoin". in fact some exchanges don't even use BTC for instance kraken uses XBT.
3. Roger Ver has always been interested in making money and becoming richer. he hasn't done anything for bitcoin he has done it for his own pocket. just like the way he doubled his amount of coins when he started BCH.
