Topic: . (Read 946 times)

Winners!

01 - 0.0030 - Ramelius
02 - 0.0006 - haloxon
03 - 0.0006 - haloxon
04 - 0.0014 - haloxon
05 - 0.0006 - haloxon
06 - 0.0004 - haloxon
07 - 0.0008 - haloxon
08 - 0.0006 - haloxon
09 - 0.0004 - haloxon
10 - 0.0004 - haloxon
11 - 0.0002 - tweetious
12 - 0.0004 - Ramelius
13 - 0.0004 - geophphreigh
14 - 0.0002 - tweetious
15 - 0.0002 - ChiBitCTy
16 - 0.0002 - Coin_trader
17 - 0.0004 - Ramelius
18 - 0.0002 - Coin_trader
19 - 0.0004 - haloxon
20 - 0.0006 - haloxon
21 - 0.0004 - ZipReg
22 - 0.0004 - Ramelius
23 - 0.0004 - Ramelius
24 - 0.0004 - Ramelius
25 - 0.0004 - Mbitr
26 - 0.0004 - Mbitr
27 - 0.0004 - Mbitr
28 - 0.0002 - ZipReg
29 - 0.0002 - ZipReg
30 - 0.0002 - ZipReg
31 - 0.0002 - ZipReg
32 - 0.0002 - ZipReg
33 - 0.0002 - ZipReg
34 - 0.0002 - ZipReg
35 - 0.0002 - ZipReg
36 - 0.0002 - ZipReg
37 - 0.0002 - ZipReg
38 - 0.0002 - ZipReg
39 - 0.0002 - geophphreigh
40 - 0.0002 - geophphreigh
41 - 0.0002 - geophphreigh
42 - 0.0004 - tweetious
43 - 0.0002 - ZipReg
44 - 0.0002 - ZipReg
45 - 0.0002 - ZipReg
46 - 0.0002 - ZipReg
47 - 0.0002 - ZipReg
48 - 0.0002 - ZipReg
49 - 0.0002 - ZipReg
50 - 0.0006 - haloxon
51 - 0.0004 - Hox
52 - 0.0004 - Hox
53 - 0.0004 - Hox
54 - 0.0004 - Hox
55 - 0.0004 - Hox
56 - 0.0004 - Hox
57 - 0.0004 - Hox
58 - 0.0004 - Hox
59 - 0.0004 - Hox
60 - 0.0002 - ZipReg
61 - 0.0002 - ZipReg
62 - 0.0002 - ZipReg
63 - 0.0002 - ZipReg
64 - 0.0002 - ZipReg
65 - 0.0002 - ZipReg
66 - 0.0002 - tweetious
67 - 0.0002 - ZipReg
68 - 0.0002 - ZipReg
69 - 0.0004 - tweetious
70 - 0.0002 - ZipReg
71 - 0.0002 - ZipReg
72 - 0.0002 - ZipReg
73 - 0.0002 - ZipReg
74 - 0.0002 - ZipReg
75 - 0.0002 - ZipReg
76 - 0.0002 - ZipReg
77 - 0.0002 - ZipReg
78 - 0.0002 - ZipReg
79 - 0.0002 - ZipReg
80 - 0.0002 - ZipReg
81 - 0.0002 - ZipReg
82 - 0.0002 - ZipReg
83 - 0.0004 - haloxon
84 - 0.0002 - ZipReg
85 - 0.0002 - ZipReg
86 - 0.0002 - Agrawas
87 - 0.0002 - Agrawas
88 - 0.0002 - ZipReg
89 - 0.0002 - ZipReg
90 - 0.0002 - ZipReg
91 - 0.0002 - ZipReg
92 - 0.0002 - ZipReg
93 - 0.0002 - ZipReg
94 - 0.0002 - ZipReg
95 - 0.0002 - ZipReg
96 - 0.0004 - tweetious
97 - 0.0002 - ZipReg
98 - 0.0002 - ZipReg
99 - 0.0004 - haloxon
100 - 0.0004 - haloxon

Auction is over.
Will post winners shortly

whoop whoop 

Thanks for another great auction MJ , will wait for pm 

not nice 

#01 @ 0.003

lot1 0.0022
lot4 0.0014

#4 @ 0.0012

really George?

#01 @ 0.002

lot1 0.0016
lot4 0.0010
lot7 0.0008

#4 @ 0.0008

42 - 0.0004BTC
69 - 0.0004BTC
96 - 0.0004BTC

#01 @ 0.0014
#07 @ 0.0006
#12 @ 0.0004
#17 @ 0.0004
#21 -  #24 0.0004

#25 -0.0004BTC
#26- 0.0004BTC
#27- 0.0004BTC
Please
Edited - checked bidding  increments 

#13 .0004BTC

1 - 0.0012
2 - 0.0006
3 - 0.0006
4 - 0.0006
5 - 0.0006
6 - 0.0004
7 - 0.0004
8 - 0.0006
9 - 0.0004
10 - 0.0004
19 - 0.0004
20 - 0.0006
50 - 0.0006
83 - 0.0004
99 - 0.0004
100 - 0.0004

Is this auction already ended?

Never mind, I didn't notice that the time was linked to the countdown. 12hrs to go 

#2-5 @0.0004BTC each

#50-59 0.0004 Each

I give up on lot 1 and it is only 6th.
good luck everyone! 

well that should have been the case
but well whatever

lot 1 @ 0.001 BTC

Lot #1  .0008 BTC

I appreciate the bids.

The whole coin council can prove you wrong.

How do we know killyou didn't exit scam from original 2019 coin and sold account, this new ffrankie person may be imposter killyou just trying to making BTC from duplicates of 2019 coin, can y prove me wrong?!

20 @ 0.0004BTC
21 @ 0.0004BTC
All left @ 0.0002BTC

You can still bid on the numbers u want. 

If that were the case I would have saved the same numbers I needed for my sets.

If that were the case you would have all the number 1 coins if memory serves me correctly.

no reservations of old numbers owned?


lot 1 @ 0.0006

The first 1-10 were auctioned early sept. These coins in this auction weren't even a thought until late October.

They are a lot different if you hold one of each and look at it.

0.0002BTC for Number 16 to 20

Your ass salesmanship has nothing to do with this. Your production vs. manufacturing dictionary-off has nothing to do with this. Are you unable to answer a question without leading off down an irrelevant trail?
Was the second run of 100 coins planned and known about when you offered sales/auctions of coins 1-100 of the first batch?

I stand by this statement as a collector and seeing a seemingly limited mintage of coins double in size AFTER sales took place based on low serial numbers.

If the second 100 started as serials 101 to 200 I wouldn't even be arguing this.

You should teach a course at Wharton.

Since when does production cost = manufacture cost? The cost of manufacture is lower than production as production includes a variety of expenses while manufacture is the sole cost of production of said item. At least to my understanding.  


I did not break even with the 2019 coin, and if you include the cost of the design for the 2018 coin I did not break even.

I will not convert their bid to USD and try to daydream up your production cost + additional runs? If they were not informed that another 100 of these were in production it is an asshole move. If you convert their bid to USD multiplied by the number of coins they bought you'll find the amount they should be refunded.

You effectively increased the mintage number by 100%.

If you convert their bid to a USD it is about $1.50 per coin. You can increase the price of that multiply times and it does not cover the cost of manufacture.


The first coins fit in a standard airtight and I think are better. But it seems most people prefer no airtight or an ugly airtight with a foam ring and a better looking coin

# 008  .0004        thank you

no worry tee, I'm fine with it, but thanks anyway  

edit: 48 it have been, will serve as small xmas treasures   - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.53114797

Did the guy that bought 60+ of these know there was going to be another 100 released? Seems kind of dirty if it wasn't mentioned before and he/she thought they were cornering the market.

#66 @ 0.0002BTC
#99 @ 0.0002BTC
#100 @ 0.0002BTC

# 008   .0003

#’s 13, 39, 40, 41, 42 @ 0.0002BTC

#21    0.0002

Viz

coin number 4, 0.0004 btc Ill donate the btc to the fourm since this is my auction.


I meant coin number 14.

1 KY Jelly Sail the Seas 2019 @ .0002BTC

 

so.. is it still a "LIFO bidding style" or is it changed to specific # bidding style? i.e. 100 different bids (Any bid made in last 10 minutes will extend the SPECIFIC BID # auction 10 minutes beyond the ending time.)... chaos... LOL

(didn't want to edit my above bidding post, hence I am posting a sequential post, apologies about that)

10 @0.0002BTC

(10 coins not #10)

Lot #1  .0004 BTC

Coins 86 and 87 - .0002BTC

Lot 69 (Coin #69) @ .0002

Lot #1 0.0002BTC
Lot #2 0.0002BTC
Lot #3 0.0002BTC

I would like to make a matching set (killyou you sly dog you) with my other 2019 Sail the Seas 2019 specimen.  Can we bid on specific serial numbers?

If so, #004 @ 0.0002

.