Topic: ~ (Read 382 times)

Thanks for the concern. You are right I shouldn't believe anyone just like that. I will be more careful from now on. Thanks for saving me from a possible loss. 

Oh yeah, have a look at our blog here:
https://medium.com/concordium and especially at our Science section: https://medium.com/concordium/tagged/science

This announcement is not a call for investment, as the project is not even doing an ICO.
The announcement's main purpose is to distribute awareness of a new blockchain, which targets a new breed of BaaS solutions.

Absolutely!
Everyone is encouraged to take a deeper dive into the project to get a grasp of its application of ZK, new layer-1 applications, and presentations of early usage.

Concordium will be open for usage rather than investment, so any qualms on investment value are not applicable. 
The project has delivered a technological leap for enterprise solutions and tests with major early partners is underway. However, as it is a blockchain, it will also cater to wider global usage for not just large corps, but small businesses and even entrepreneurial devs.

Reserved for thread updates.

What a start!
My name is Beni and I'm from Team Concordium so no ambiguity here.
And our dear friend who called me shitcoiner since I was Beam CMO, well...
Anyway, my first post here.
And i just wanted to provide some precisions:
1. Concordium will not conduct any public funding. No ICO, no IEO. Period. We have secured several rounds of funding and we will open a new one in a couple of weeks but only for accredited investors, VCs and Family offices.
2. Concordium is novel Tier 1 Blockchain based on a 2-layer consensus and with an ID Layer at the protocol level. Public, permissionless, Concordium is the ultimate alternative to Hyperledger and Corda.
3. Concordium is based on a PoS mechanism, currently pPoS but we will deploy a smart and dedicated Delegation mechanism.
4. Concordium will deploy a Private Sharding architecture for better security and scalability when our finality will be "used" as a service between all the shards.
5. Concordium has a clear business orientation with already in development use cases in the automobile, Identity and Voting industries.
6. No decentralization for Concordium for now, but when the market conditions and the technology landscape will allow it, we will move from a semi centralized governance to a fully decentralized one.
7. Concordium is based in Switzerland but has offices in London, Copenhagen, not far from Marbella and in Tel Aviv.
8. The Tech team is led by Dr. Torben Perdersen, the father of the Pedersen Commitment and is driven by COBRA, a dedicated Research Center at Arrhus University and led by Prof. Jesper Nielsen and Prof. Claudio Orlandi.
That's it for now.
If you feel like having some debates when it comes to our approach on privacy, auditability and other subjects like Crypto Kitties (just kidding), feel free to find us on Discord and on Twitter.

i don't think concordium is open for public funding, so no possible losses.
Now it's clearly looks like a project that doesn't have its place here.
I mean, ID Layer? Meaning compliant?
And the team looks very far from the blockchain world (beside the science team of course and somebody from the shitcoin Beam).
Anybody had a look on their white paper?
What kind of PoS mechanism do they use?

I seriously doubt this is Hhampuz project, maybe he will handle the promotional campaign for this project. Anyway, I don't think he will be liable for possible losses of an investor on this project if he is not in anyway part of the team. It is always the user's responsibility to do his own due diligence when it comes to investing in crypto project. He can't do the work for you.

But I suggest if the team can also create their own official account here so they can respond to questions from the community, in which, Hhampuz can't answer on some of them.

You shouldn't stop here to do your own research. Anyone and even a member with a good reputation can be fooled one day. You also need to learn how future project prospects are, even if you believe the project is safe from potential scams.
So far, Hhampuz hasn't stated that this is his project. I don't think Hhampuz will be fully responsible for your losses.

many altcoin right now running this method(*running node get paid without torture the CPU), would be great if testnet balance carried till mainnet 

You shouldn't stop here to do your own research. Anyone and even a member with a good reputation can be fooled one day. You also need to learn how future project prospects are, even if you believe the project is safe from potential scams.
So far, Hhampuz hasn't stated that this is his project. I don't think Hhampuz will be fully responsible for your losses.

If Hhampuz posted a project here, it means he accepted the job of posting the project on behalf of the team because he believes that this is a legit project.
Reputable BMs usually don't accept the job of representing a project unless he is truly convinced with the intentions of the project.
So let's see if this will really be indeed a good project to watch out for or not...

good catch )

An ANN from a legendary account? Well, my doubts are gone that's for sure. 

Oh btw, please fix the typo (Concodium instead of Concordium  ) in this image :

 

Reserved

~~