Topic: . (Read 443 times)

I hope you are not feeling overconfident about it. In a lot of occasions, you did not able to back yourself up enough that you are clean. The way your plagiarism case developed, it surely divided users into two or more groups. I guess you are still around because the mods and admin are with the group who think the act is not a black and white plagiarism case.

I have seen users to go completely mad at some point and turn themselves into a troll. Let's hope in your case it will be different. Your motive should not be something to humiliate whoever find something against you.

This shows your weakness.

A way of covering up something one does not like?

Ratimov I think you should just give up and stop adding more oil and gasoline to the fire  
Meanwhile...in his bunker airfinex is diligently working scanning every word Ratimov wrote in forum to find if any of his other topics are just translations, so he can win promised reward of $5000.
Sounds like a good business arrangement to me... for services section.

I got the same impression. The feedback you left airfinex doesn't help either: this looks more like a personal attack than anything based on facts:

When I read feedback like this, it makes whoever wrote it look bad, not whoever received it.


That would be very obvious Trust abuse.

Wait 8 months

To me it seems like a weakness to try to defame the person who made some valid arguments. I still think the plagiarism rules should be adjusted, this shouldn't be allowed (see my reasons why).
Big surprise: the guy who first posted about Ratimov's plagiarism received negative feedback the next day:

I can't help but think Ratimov was angry when he tagged those users. Here's another "brain-dead fucker". I don't know why Ratimov left them negative feedback in English, because I can't read the Russian Reference links. I see one very strong connection though: they've criticized Ratimov, so he tags them.
And then you wonder why people use alt accounts?
Allow me to quote myself:

I wonder why you're attacking DireWolfM14's character, instead of responding to what he says.

You can't have freedom of speech without DireWolfM14 having it too.

---

---

They may be alts, but does it really matter? I've long given up on trying to find "cheaters" amongst bounty spammers, it's pretty obvious many of them must use dozens of accounts. Let them spam Twitter and Facebook as much as they want, let Jack and Mark deal with it.
He could indeed just as well have added theymos' Bitcoin address. I don't think he's expecting any donations, so the address in his profile has no value.

I'm not going to get into the Ratimov-airfinex argument, as I'm only recently learning what happened, but I agree with you that airfinex is anything but dumb. He's quite clever, and while we won't be able to know for sure, it seems quite plausible to me that he added the address to mislead. He doesn't seem at all like the typical bounty-hunter shitposter who usually gets caught by lovesmayfamilis for ban evasion for having used the same or a clearly connected address.

I think I can answer this for everyone in 2 words WHO CARES. Great job exposing the big farm but without more on this case, quit wasting our time with your agenda.

Good grief, you've gone full timelord. Two shit-stirring sockpuppets woke up on the same day because there was some drama going on at the time. That doesn't mean they're alts.


You're proving that DireWolfM14 was right.

It's not delusional at all; I had the same thought, and I seriously doubt this is a case of contagious delusion.  The timing says it all, IMO, and I'm talking about the timing between airfinex's post here and the creation of this thread.  But all of that aside, there does seem to be a connection between those accounts that's supported by blockchain evidence.

If you left him a negative for accusing you of plagiarism, you'd most likely end up being ~'ed from some members' trust lists, including mine, since that would be a bogus reason for a red trust.  And speaking of that, if you're convinced that airfinex is an alt account of a bounty cheater, why haven't you tagged him accordingly?  Don't know if you're on DT or not, but since you're the one who presented the evidence it seems like yours should be the first negative trust on his profile.

Oooh!
I've wanted to know who ScumBuster is!
He surprises me both ways..

   

You're claim that this is an old dispute between you and airfinex that has run it's course is disingenuous.  No, actually it's a lie.  He just called you out two or three days ago.   I also find it interesting that you (of all people) keep attempting to insult my intelligence.  You are incapable of defending yourself, which is why you attack those who accuse you of plagiarism.

Stop deflecting, address your problems head on.  It's the only way to resolve them.  That's nothing more than friendly advice, and now I'm done here.

I think your investigation does not make any sense, and I will explain why ... Looking through the history of airfinex messages, I noticed a few phrases in French, but obviously he speaks Russian and with all this he says goodbye in Swedish or Swiss (although I'm not sure what it is Swedish phrase).

In addition, his frequent quotes with reference to Theymos' words about confidentiality as an argument make me think that this guy is not an idiot and added this ETH address just for a diversion. If so, then you wasted your time on this investigation.

The connection between airfinex and smoolae seems solid but I don't see how that's relevant. It was obvious that the airfinex account is someone's sockuppet and sockpuppeting is allowed here.

bangkecol has a completely different posting style and is very unlikely to be related to airfinex/smoolae.

Advantage?  What possible advantage am I offering anyone by talking about your head-hunts that result in nothing?  I don't know that user, and I'm not offering him any support.  I'm talking about you and your tendencies.  Stop deflecting.

Ah, now I'm delusional and lacking "thought process" in my head.

Sorry I'm not a Ratimov fanboy.  I guess you'll just have to spend the next week going through my blockchain history.  Carry on.

May I make a suggestion?  How about adding a summary of what you're trying to prove at the top of the post, so I don't have to try to follow tenuous blockchain transactions?

One more?  Stop trying to discredit those who allege that you're a plagiarist.  Maybe the best way to deal with those people is to admit that your text-spinning, google-translating, article-highjacking tendencies were wrong, and issue an apology.  Once you own it, it stops being a tool people can use against you.

To me this looks like a blatant attempt to attack some one who called you out.  I know you've developed a few supporters here, but I suspect that they too will cease their support if you keep making these obvious retaliatory attacks.  Deflection and "What-About-ism" doesn't absolve you of your sins.

Since both of them using the same address, I believe they are alt account; the only fact to reconsider is airfinex is trying to defame smoolae which I really doubt as the account doesn’t seem to be a good one to target.
Other connections which you shared may be true but they are not enough proof as people may exchange, sell or use such wallets which eventually link up the connection of one address with others. May be that's what happened. I'm just trying to share the possible outcome.

: