as tempting as that is, I dont think I would want to share any private keys to any coins I have peeled - not openly at least.
understandable, thats why I posted "members who feel comfortable." but also who's to say that you peeled them? no one really knows.
and just for educational purposes: Mopar, is there any added exposure between sharing a used private key from a coin compared to a used set of firstbits on a coin? ( I do not know the answer to this question, you would know better then me)
Mopar, by well known coins are you talking specifically Casascius and BTCC? I don’t think people are worried about those makers as much as the other guys. Also, I don’t think the full keys are necessary for this purpose. Mainly just to see sample font to determine if it is intelligible. Could potentially blotout the majority.
RS, great idea! Correct me if I’m wrong. I’ll add $40 to pot.
Edit: pot contributions dependent on more than 10 total submissions collectively
or any coin that was sold here on the forums where the buyer can be identified as buying "#10 of 21 with address: xxxxxxx"
then that private key shown here can be linked to that address and thus that buyer.
Either way, I am certain someone will do it for the bounty.
The only coins I have peeled, I did so openly anyways - 20 or so mrcryptohodl coins which had a 20% error/issue rate (all were remedied) and the yogg cards.
everything else that I have peeled has been to assist others.
