0.3.20 is cheaper to run than 0.3.21

gigabytecoin

sr. member

Activity: 280

Merit: 252

Quote from: Littleshop on May 22, 2011, 07:49:59 PM

I pay the fee .01 every time. I do not mind supporting the network. Currently it is six cents for most transactions. If I was sending under 1btc I would enjoy paying a smaller fee but that is not too important.

Fees should be calculated as a percentage if less than 100x the initial "minimum fee" is being sent imho.

benjamindees

legendary

Activity: 1330

Merit: 1000

Mine doesn't?

Quote

Pay transaction fee: 0.00

Littleshop

legendary

Activity: 1386

Merit: 1004

I pay the fee .01 every time. I do not mind supporting the network. Currently it is six cents for most transactions. If I was sending under 1btc I would enjoy paying a smaller fee but that is not too important.

theymos

administrator

Activity: 5222

Merit: 13032

Quote from: BitterTea on May 22, 2011, 07:28:52 PM

Do you pay a fee by default or no? What's keeping you on .15 instead of upgrading?

I don't pay a fee by default, though if there's any possibility that a send might create a large transaction, I'll add a fee manually.

I don't find the features of later versions to be necessary for my usage. Unnecessary changes = insecurity and instability. My 0.3.15 client does not have 8333 forwarded to it: I run 0.3.19 (with a few added changes from later versions) on my Internet-facing client.

I'm thinking that I might start publishing "stable" versions of 0.3.19 and 0.3.20 with bugfixes backported. Feature changes are happening way too fast.

BitterTea

sr. member

Activity: 294

Merit: 252

Quote from: theymos on May 22, 2011, 07:08:22 PM

I'm still using 0.3.15. I haven't had any fee problems so far.

Do you pay a fee by default or no? What's keeping you on .15 instead of upgrading?

Alex Beckenham

full member

Activity: 154

Merit: 100

Quote from: error on May 22, 2011, 07:05:49 PM

True. Though your free transactions also have to wait, and this could be several hours. In the past, the free transaction queue has stretched to days.

Yep I realise some can take foooreveeeerrrrr, but if I need 'em to go fast I just attach a fee manually, then go back to 0.00 after the important send is done.

Will try 22 once it's vetted and on bitcoin.org.

theymos

administrator

Activity: 5222

Merit: 13032

I'm still using 0.3.15. I haven't had any fee problems so far.

error

hero member

Activity: 588

Merit: 500

Quote from: Alex Beckenham on May 22, 2011, 07:00:49 PM

I'm sure this has been discussed elsewhere on the forum but I couldn't find it.

I've found that 0.3.21 forces me to pay a 0.01 transaction fee pretty much EVERY time.

But switching back to 0.3.20 still lets me do free transactions, so for now that's what I'll run whenever I need to send money.

True. Though your free transactions also have to wait, and this could be several hours. In the past, the free transaction queue has stretched to days.

This is supposedly fixed up on 0.3.22. Might want to try that out.

Alex Beckenham

full member

Activity: 154

Merit: 100

I'm sure this has been discussed elsewhere on the forum but I couldn't find it.

I've found that 0.3.21 forces me to pay a 0.01 transaction fee pretty much EVERY time.

But switching back to 0.3.20 still lets me do free transactions, so for now that's what I'll run whenever I need to send money.

Topic: 0.3.20 is cheaper to run than 0.3.21 (Read 1652 times)