Topic: 100% sure Lauda is a fraudster (Read 503 times)

This is another kind of extortion attempt. It is an indirect way of telling, "Stay away from speaking against me, or you will be negatively tagged". Lauda was an extortionist / a bully and will always remain one. The misuse of her power to hide her sins will only end once she is thrown out of Default Trust list. Then only people will be able to voice themselves against her without any fear of getting negatively tagged.

Said with your account information is your password and E-mail infoes has been change recently. There are some ways to remove the red trust with you is to tell lauda that you're the one who is handeling the account since it was made. Show evidence to lauda. Then she can remove your red tag.

Nah, no fraud involved.

''This user's password was reset recently.
This user's email address was changed recently. ''

Enough to get a neg rating.

It is, but not here and not in this case. My issues with Lauda also do not apply here, so asking for my assistence does not give you any bonus points just because they and I had a difficult history.

An account can be sold without leaving any publicly available data, thus proving an account has actually been sold is not possible. On the other hand it is easily possible to proof you are still the same person by proving a signed message. Either using your PGP key, should you have made one public, or using a bitcoin adress via which you have received funds in the past. Sometimes neither is possible, but this is only in the hands of the account owner. I tried my best in the past to make signing message as easily accessible to as many people as possible and other members have tried to make sure people "stake" an address for these cases.

With all said above, it is - of course - still possible to sell a private PGP or bitcoin key. Thus a signed message is no solid proof either. It is hover (or was, I am a bit out of touch) considered unlikely considering they keys are often used for other reasons as well.

tl;dr: I cant help you here, nor anyway else with similar issues. People will - out of spit or other reasons - dig into your history and try to find something they can use against you.

1) Lay down your claim with enough proof.

---

Stating the "fact" is what you admitted ,you fucking dumbass.
What in the frick's world? Do you even know what shit you're blabbering about? You negging him won't do anything. Moreover,if anyone has TheUltraElite in their trust,the neg rating would just increase when someone views your profile. You seriously have no clue on how the trust system works..
And you're actually yet another butt-hurt troll who doesn't know what exactly happened.Not guilty? Who told you so? Self-assumption? Boy,that's not good...
You haven't exposed jack-shit about lauda,rather your foolishness is exposing your own mistakes and stupidity.
Argh.. When will people get rid of their stupidity

I got a neg from OG " I run a scam club" Nasty...

that one doesn't count.. guess why? because that bloke doesn't believe in BTC... he quotes his seats and dividends in USD

he takes out BTC loans - cant fulfill them, so offers worthless seats and some USD as a compromise

oh and he is also a cunt... so what?

You and Lauda both actually have red tagged by other DT member. LOL

that is not confession for sure 100%. when a hero account is worth 0.01, then you lost 0.01 when got red tagged. I just stating the fact, there is no admission.

i have not promoted any hyip.

I left you a neg as well - this doesn't have a lot to do with me.. but negging pricks like you is rather therapeutic

a bit like when you stamp on a cockroach or similar

You are guilty of
1. Buying Selling accounts on this forum which leads to shitposting scamming and shady activity potentially criminal activity.
2. Retaliating on this. Promoting a ponzi/HYIP.
3. Calling DT members as "fraudstars" while you have zero idea how many "fraudstars" like you they have caught and busted.

The person lacking common sense it you. The proofs are in the of the feedback. Learn to read properly before you comment.

Do you have any proofs of that? Otherwise its a blatant lie.

If you are happy then why are you here? Go have a drink and party.

Self-confession I see about account sale I see.

---

Enjoy another negative tag from me.

nonsense. I just stated these account general value.

Rather it is you that admit you remember I said I would quite 7 months ago. I am 100% sure you are dishonest when putting negative trust.

Ergo, self admission of a purchased account.

I am not guilty of anything. The burden of proof is always on the party who made the accusation. It is also a common sense.

What is clear from the whole thing is Lauda’s dishonesty. That is the highlight.

Anyway I am extremely happy to have exposed Lauda’s dishonesty.

I have only lost 5mbtc for this account which is insignificant.

Its probably because you like to gobble used sausages on a friday night.

Lauda doesnt like you.. so what... Lauda is the great dictator overlord of the forum... deal with it - or dont, just spin up another alt... enjoy your used sausages tonight and come back tomorrow..

its not as if you have any trust on this forum anyway - come back as a 2.0! who cares.. you will only get negged again

You are the one with signs of a bought/hacked account. I'd say the responsibility of clearing your name is most definitely on you.


Of course you'd know the price range.


As of right now, the negative rating is most definitely valid. Sure, he likely wouldn't have noticed your account if you didn't post in that specific thread, but it's a good thing you did because the signs of your account being hacked/bought were spotted and identified. Unfortunately for you, it doesn't seem as if you can provide any evidence against this and so you'll just continue avoiding providing proof by being outraged and being apathetic towards your account - both of which don't help your case at all.


I'm assuming the proof will never come and you'll continue running your mouth and refusing to prove yourself innocent. Suit yourself.

7 months ago you said you were quitting the forum.[1]

Nope. It is exactly on you. If my account were to look suspicious, I'd get tagged and others would ask me to provide proof of ownership.

Maybe, when you are guilty, you should avoid drawing attention to yourself. A lot of people got caught this way.

---

[1] Quickseller story 2.0.

Surely Lauda is acting dishonestly, you can make a judgment by yourself. I am sure that in fact he knew the account has never been sold.

Complete nonsense. Don’t even have common sense. The burden of proof is not on me.

Plus I will not waste time on these. These account mostly worth 5mtc.

Also, if the system is like this, people like Lauda play the politics and give revenge rating like this, even the negative rating is void, there is no point to use these account.

But I am happy to gain these good experience.

Then refute his claim. Give evidence that you're the only person who has owned that account. Sign old bitcoin addresses, dig up social media accounts, etc etc. Don't just complain and try to make a connection of fraud with a negative rep (albeit somewhat preemptive).

Just minutes after I made a free comment on this post

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1764757.280

he gave me a negative trust.

It is lucky that I have not wasted much time on this site.