Topic: $1,000 bounty for Blockchain.COM (not .info) (Updated to $1,500) (Read 8327 times)
I can intro you to the owner...PM me if interested.
It looks like someone just registered it. It is hosted at namecheap. Hope you got it!
$1000? For real? 
$1000 is low price even for pointless random domains. This one is worth much, much, MUCH more.
$1000 is low price even for pointless random domains. This one is worth much, much, MUCH more.http://www.namecheap.com/
$4 to register a domain, I would say $1000 is a very fair price
Some domain names sell for 500k+ one that I was looking to bid on in auction went to 850k...
Worst casenario you can wait until next year when it expires and bid it out from under him.
Hard to outbid if they renew before expiry
True. True, True.
April 27, 2013, 03:40:54 AM
Fuck him
Spend the money on all other domains and short domains
Then leave a backorder, he'll quit someday
Spend the money on all other domains and short domains
Then leave a backorder, he'll quit someday
April 24, 2013, 06:13:05 AM
Worst casenario you can wait until next year when it expires and bid it out from under him.
Hard to outbid if they renew before expiry
April 23, 2013, 02:33:43 PM
Stop looking at the whois information like noobs. It is a private registration, and the information you see there is the privacy company.
Result: Domain - Blockchain.com IS currently subscribed to WhoisGuard.
If the person doesn't answer their emails, then the only way you might even find out the owner is by using law enforcement in Panama. Suing the domain registrar won't help you either. http://domainnamewire.com/2011/05/09/namecheap-sued-over-whoisguard/
Even if you were to trademark the domain name and pay the $5000+ to file with ICANN, you would likely get tossed under arbitration (possibly with the registrar representing); they only need evidence that you acted in bad faith to obtain the domain and you have no established business.
Result: Domain - Blockchain.com IS currently subscribed to WhoisGuard.
If the person doesn't answer their emails, then the only way you might even find out the owner is by using law enforcement in Panama. Suing the domain registrar won't help you either. http://domainnamewire.com/2011/05/09/namecheap-sued-over-whoisguard/
Even if you were to trademark the domain name and pay the $5000+ to file with ICANN, you would likely get tossed under arbitration (possibly with the registrar representing); they only need evidence that you acted in bad faith to obtain the domain and you have no established business.
Actually you should have read a bit more on the case you posted its not the first one(and they lost that one) and namecheap have given up the details of the registered person in multiple cases.
Also wrong on the UDRP, fee for single panelist is $1500 and the registar is not allowed to be involved in it
Quote
G. The Role of the Registrar
What is the registrar's role in the administrative proceeding?
Except as decribed below, the registrar does not and will not participate in the administration or conduct of the administrative proceeding. The WIPO Center has prepared a flowchart (word or pdf) illustrating the basic interactions between the WIPO Center and a registrar in the course of a case.
The registrar's role in the administrative proceeding is as follows:
(i) To provide requested information to the WIPO Center, including confirming that the disputed domain name is registered with it, that it is registered by the person or entity identified as the Respondent in the Complaint, providing the Respondent's contact details and, when necessary, the Registration Agreement and associated documents;
(ii) To prevent the transfer to a third party of a domain name registration after an Administrative Proceeding has commenced; and
(iii) To implement the Administrative Panel's decision.
What is the registrar's role in the administrative proceeding?
Except as decribed below, the registrar does not and will not participate in the administration or conduct of the administrative proceeding. The WIPO Center has prepared a flowchart (word or pdf) illustrating the basic interactions between the WIPO Center and a registrar in the course of a case.
The registrar's role in the administrative proceeding is as follows:
(i) To provide requested information to the WIPO Center, including confirming that the disputed domain name is registered with it, that it is registered by the person or entity identified as the Respondent in the Complaint, providing the Respondent's contact details and, when necessary, the Registration Agreement and associated documents;
(ii) To prevent the transfer to a third party of a domain name registration after an Administrative Proceeding has commenced; and
(iii) To implement the Administrative Panel's decision.
And I assume that the person who owns blockchain.info has enough proof that he has a established business and not acting in bad faith.
April 23, 2013, 10:19:45 AM
$1000? For real? $1000 is low price even for pointless random domains. This one is worth much, much, MUCH more.
$1000 is low price even for pointless random domains. This one is worth much, much, MUCH more.http://www.namecheap.com/
$4 to register a domain, I would say $1000 is a very fair price
April 23, 2013, 08:56:18 AM
$1000? For real? $1000 is low price even for pointless random domains. This one is worth much, much, MUCH more.
$1000 is low price even for pointless random domains. This one is worth much, much, MUCH more. 
April 23, 2013, 08:34:42 AM
Stop looking at the whois information like noobs. It is a private registration, and the information you see there is the privacy company.
Result: Domain - Blockchain.com IS currently subscribed to WhoisGuard.
If the person doesn't answer their emails, then the only way you might even find out the owner is by using law enforcement in Panama. Suing the domain registrar won't help you either. http://domainnamewire.com/2011/05/09/namecheap-sued-over-whoisguard/
Even if you were to trademark the domain name and pay the $5000+ to file with ICANN, you would likely get tossed under arbitration (possibly with the registrar representing); they only need evidence that you acted in bad faith to obtain the domain and you have no established business.
Result: Domain - Blockchain.com IS currently subscribed to WhoisGuard.
If the person doesn't answer their emails, then the only way you might even find out the owner is by using law enforcement in Panama. Suing the domain registrar won't help you either. http://domainnamewire.com/2011/05/09/namecheap-sued-over-whoisguard/
Even if you were to trademark the domain name and pay the $5000+ to file with ICANN, you would likely get tossed under arbitration (possibly with the registrar representing); they only need evidence that you acted in bad faith to obtain the domain and you have no established business.
April 23, 2013, 07:46:32 AM
Just a word of warning using the whois contact email first results is
http://www.scamwarners.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=24523
Basically saying the person(s) who lives at the address is a scammer who uses stolen credit cards, they also happen to use name cheap so if you do find them I'd be careful about the exchange
http://www.scamwarners.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=24523
Basically saying the person(s) who lives at the address is a scammer who uses stolen credit cards, they also happen to use name cheap so if you do find them I'd be careful about the exchange
April 23, 2013, 03:43:47 AM
I contacted him (not the whois protected stuff) and waiting for his response...
Oh, so you know him?
April 23, 2013, 03:32:50 AM
I contacted him (not the whois protected stuff) and waiting for his response...
April 20, 2013, 07:38:36 AM
Quote
Expiration date: 08 Mar 2013 05:04:00
They just renewed it. For me it looks like 2014 April 20, 2013, 07:33:55 AM
Here are the should results:
I reccomend finding the phone number and calling, or faxing. Worst casenario you can wait until next year when it expires and bid it out from under him.
Quote
Registration Service Provided By: Namecheap.com
Contact: [email protected]
Visit: http://namecheap.com
Domain name: BLOCKCHAIN.COM
Registrant Contact:
WhoisGuard
WhoisGuard Protected ()
Fax:
11400 W. Olympic Blvd. Suite 200
Los Angeles, CA 90064
US
Administrative Contact:
WhoisGuard
WhoisGuard Protected ([email protected])
+1.6613102107
Fax: +1.6613102107
11400 W. Olympic Blvd. Suite 200
Los Angeles, CA 90064
US
Technical Contact:
WhoisGuard
WhoisGuard Protected ([email protected])
+1.6613102107
Fax: +1.6613102107
11400 W. Olympic Blvd. Suite 200
Los Angeles, CA 90064
US
Status: Locked
Name Servers:
dns1.registrar-servers.com
dns2.registrar-servers.com
dns3.registrar-servers.com
dns4.registrar-servers.com
dns5.registrar-servers.com
Creation date: 08 Mar 2011 10:04:00
Expiration date: 08 Mar 2014 05:04:00
Contact: [email protected]
Visit: http://namecheap.com
Domain name: BLOCKCHAIN.COM
Registrant Contact:
WhoisGuard
WhoisGuard Protected ()
Fax:
11400 W. Olympic Blvd. Suite 200
Los Angeles, CA 90064
US
Administrative Contact:
WhoisGuard
WhoisGuard Protected ([email protected])
+1.6613102107
Fax: +1.6613102107
11400 W. Olympic Blvd. Suite 200
Los Angeles, CA 90064
US
Technical Contact:
WhoisGuard
WhoisGuard Protected ([email protected])
+1.6613102107
Fax: +1.6613102107
11400 W. Olympic Blvd. Suite 200
Los Angeles, CA 90064
US
Status: Locked
Name Servers:
dns1.registrar-servers.com
dns2.registrar-servers.com
dns3.registrar-servers.com
dns4.registrar-servers.com
dns5.registrar-servers.com
Creation date: 08 Mar 2011 10:04:00
Expiration date: 08 Mar 2014 05:04:00
I reccomend finding the phone number and calling, or faxing. Worst casenario you can wait until next year when it expires and bid it out from under him.
April 20, 2013, 04:59:09 AM
u can ask a sedo.com broker to buy it for you http://sedo.com/us/buy-domains/domain-brokerage/?language=us
April 19, 2013, 08:03:06 PM
Why doesnt he just dispute the registration of it with icann?
it currently has malware on it as well.
it currently has malware on it as well.
I don't see the malware, just usual parking page with ads. But you may be on to something.
Quote
Cancellation of Registrations in the Event of Material Breach by the Registrant
If the registrant fails to respond "for over fifteen calendar days to inquiries by Registrar concerning the accuracy of contact details", then pursuant to RAA Subsection 3.7.7.2 the registrant is in "material breach" of its registration agreement with the registrar. That subsection also provides that "willful provision of inaccurate or unreliable information" shall constitute a material beach of the registration agreement. Under either of these circumstances, the RAA provides that the material breach of the registration agreement shall be "a basis for cancellation of the Registered Name registration."
http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/advisory-10may02-en.htmIf the registrant fails to respond "for over fifteen calendar days to inquiries by Registrar concerning the accuracy of contact details", then pursuant to RAA Subsection 3.7.7.2 the registrant is in "material breach" of its registration agreement with the registrar. That subsection also provides that "willful provision of inaccurate or unreliable information" shall constitute a material beach of the registration agreement. Under either of these circumstances, the RAA provides that the material breach of the registration agreement shall be "a basis for cancellation of the Registered Name registration."
So, if some deadbeat squatter who can't be bothered to respond to emails from their Registrar owns it, it might be possible to revoke the registration. I would say contact the registrar saying you don't get a response and suspect the contact info is inaccurate. Whether blockchain.info can guarantee they're the ones to receive it in that case, may be a different issue.
Might also check with WhoisGuard to confirm they have been forwarding your attempts and haven't been getting bounced mails or something like that.
Like other suggested solutions in the past, if it were this easy it probably would have already been done, but may as well throw it out there. Shame to see this domain name languish without even hearing of ridiculous demands for a $1million sale or something.
April 19, 2013, 07:30:19 PM
Why doesnt he just dispute the registration of it with icann?
it currently has malware on it as well.
it currently has malware on it as well.
April 17, 2013, 05:38:16 AM
So, has anyone managed to contact the owner of this domain?
I've noticed its registration has been renewed very recently!!!
I've noticed its registration has been renewed very recently!!!
October 12, 2012, 09:13:18 AM
Well, I wasn't sure if it had been tried. Since it was not written explicitly. At least, I thought. "the owner of the contact address does not respond", almost explicit...
I've learned not to think too much for other people. Especially when free coins are involved.
I've learned not to think too much for other people. Especially when free coins are involved.
In translation,
Quote
Hi, here's something perfectly useless and banal I've spent fifty seconds on (only because I am retarded, normally it would take five). I refuse to put any thought into this (or anything else), but please consider me for a large windfall (at least comparatively to my meager means).
Fucking Obama voters, where do they keep coming from?
On topic: owner is Satoshi himself. You will never get this domain.
October 12, 2012, 07:53:51 AM
From the whois:
11400 W. Olympic Blvd. Suite 200
Los Angeles, CA 90064
US
Anyone ever try knocking?
This is exactly why people get scammed so often. This guy is screaming scammer, You should not even consider doing business with him. There is absolutely no legitimate reason he shouldn't prove he is the owner or use escrow and there are ways to do that without compromising his anonymity. Run the other way! Don't waste your Bitcoins because it'll be just throwing them down the drain.
+1
Exactly right. Instant scammer.
haha, good call.
Expiration date: 08 Mar 2013 05:04:00
We shall see. Hopefully it gets put to good use soon.
11400 W. Olympic Blvd. Suite 200
Los Angeles, CA 90064
US
Anyone ever try knocking?
This person claims to be the owner of blockchain.com:
http://www.facebook.com/fannnnnnnnneww
I contacted them, agreed on a price in Bitcoins, but they:
1. Insisted that I pay the bitcoins first.
2. Refused to use an escrow service.
3. Refused to provide any proof that they actually own the domain.
They also said many strange things during the Skype chat in regards to the domain.
Does anyone know if this person is the real owner or if they can be trusted?
http://www.facebook.com/fannnnnnnnneww
I contacted them, agreed on a price in Bitcoins, but they:
1. Insisted that I pay the bitcoins first.
2. Refused to use an escrow service.
3. Refused to provide any proof that they actually own the domain.
They also said many strange things during the Skype chat in regards to the domain.
Does anyone know if this person is the real owner or if they can be trusted?
This is exactly why people get scammed so often. This guy is screaming scammer, You should not even consider doing business with him. There is absolutely no legitimate reason he shouldn't prove he is the owner or use escrow and there are ways to do that without compromising his anonymity. Run the other way! Don't waste your Bitcoins because it'll be just throwing them down the drain.
+1
Exactly right. Instant scammer.
I'm starting to suspect the owner is satoshi himself...
And if there's any truth to the rumors that he's dead,
that would explain the lack of response...
And if there's any truth to the rumors that he's dead,
that would explain the lack of response...
haha, good call.
Expiration date: 08 Mar 2013 05:04:00
We shall see. Hopefully it gets put to good use soon.
October 12, 2012, 07:45:27 AM
My guess is that if they hadn't come forward by now then they probably will not. Which is sad as I love piuk's services. 😰
What's in a (domain) name? The service is just as good on the .info domain. I agree that they are solid.
October 11, 2012, 10:45:21 PM
My guess is that if they hadn't come forward by now then they probably will not. Which is sad as I love piuk's services. 😰
September 21, 2012, 01:39:02 PM
I'm starting to suspect the owner is satoshi himself...
And if there's any truth to the rumors that he's dead,
that would explain the lack of response...
And if there's any truth to the rumors that he's dead,
that would explain the lack of response...
September 21, 2012, 01:34:53 PM
Sorry, was tired when reading this. Somehow I thought the 1500 was the bounty for getting the information of the owner. =/
September 21, 2012, 02:06:36 AM
It looks to me like the first post is a firm offer of $1,000 for the domain name and $500 for a verifiable introduction to the domain owner.
$1,500 total
$1,500 total
September 21, 2012, 01:43:44 AM
What kind of offer are you prepared to make for the domain? I don't own it, but I feel there would be a better response from the owner if someone were able to get a message through to them with some hard numbers, not just "please contact me".
September 20, 2012, 06:09:12 PM
bump
September 12, 2012, 10:28:12 AM
Well, I wasn't sure if it had been tried. Since it was not written explicitly. At least, I thought. "the owner of the contact address does not respond", almost explicit...
I've learned not to think too much for other people. Especially when free coins are involved.
I've learned not to think too much for other people. Especially when free coins are involved.
Indeed it's not obvious for people who read just this thread, but there are a couple other threads regarding blockchain dot com, and it's been discussed on there. Perhaps an effort should be made to keep the discussion to a single thread, locking the others.
September 12, 2012, 10:04:15 AM
Well, I wasn't sure if it had been tried. Since it was not written explicitly. At least, I thought. "the owner of the contact address does not respond", almost explicit...
I've learned not to think too much for other people. Especially when free coins are involved.
I've learned not to think too much for other people. Especially when free coins are involved.
September 12, 2012, 09:50:00 AM
Update,
I will pay $500 for simply putting me in contact with the owner of Blockchain.COM
I will pay this even if the owner doesn't actually sell me the domain.
I will pay $500 for simply putting me in contact with the owner of Blockchain.COM
I will pay this even if the owner doesn't actually sell me the domain.
Hi Blockchain_Helper,
I'm in the race for the $500 (in BTC):
http://whois.domaintools.com/blockchain.com
The WhoisGuard email address will be forwarded to the real address:
"When some one sends an email to your uniquely generated [email protected] address, we will in-turn forward it your real email address which you specify. "
Here you go:
[email protected]
Good luck! Robert
That's been tried and even more than once I think. Do you think that if it were that easy, anyone would put up a $1000 bounty for it?
September 12, 2012, 09:45:23 AM
Update,
I will pay $500 for simply putting me in contact with the owner of Blockchain.COM
I will pay this even if the owner doesn't actually sell me the domain.
I will pay $500 for simply putting me in contact with the owner of Blockchain.COM
I will pay this even if the owner doesn't actually sell me the domain.
Hi Blockchain_Helper,
I'm in the race for the $500 (in BTC):
http://whois.domaintools.com/blockchain.com
The WhoisGuard email address will be forwarded to the real address:
"When some one sends an email to your uniquely generated [email protected] address, we will in-turn forward it your real email address which you specify. "
Here you go:
[email protected]
Good luck! Robert
September 11, 2012, 05:53:12 PM
September 11, 2012, 05:45:50 PM
This person claims to be the owner of blockchain.com:
http://www.facebook.com/fannnnnnnnneww
I contacted them, agreed on a price in Bitcoins, but they:
1. Insisted that I pay the bitcoins first.
2. Refused to use an escrow service.
3. Refused to provide any proof that they actually own the domain.
They also said many strange things during the Skype chat in regards to the domain.
Does anyone know if this person is the real owner or if they can be trusted?
http://www.facebook.com/fannnnnnnnneww
I contacted them, agreed on a price in Bitcoins, but they:
1. Insisted that I pay the bitcoins first.
2. Refused to use an escrow service.
3. Refused to provide any proof that they actually own the domain.
They also said many strange things during the Skype chat in regards to the domain.
Does anyone know if this person is the real owner or if they can be trusted?
This is exactly why people get scammed so often. This guy is screaming scammer, You should not even consider doing business with him. There is absolutely no legitimate reason he shouldn't prove he is the owner or use escrow and there are ways to do that without compromising his anonymity. Run the other way! Don't waste your Bitcoins because it'll be just throwing them down the drain.
September 11, 2012, 05:35:39 PM
It should be trivially easy to prove that you own a domain, so if someone refuses to do so I would consider them a scammer.
Also not wanting to use escrow... I can't think of a single (valid) reason to not use escrow. 
September 11, 2012, 04:57:44 PM
It should be trivially easy to prove that you own a domain, so if someone refuses to do so I would consider them a scammer.
September 11, 2012, 12:20:54 PM
If anyone needs someone to verify that an entity actually owns the domain or provide an escrow or do domain transfer verification I can help on the technical end. I'd do this for free, too, I just want to see the domain blockchain.com actually used. I can verify that WHOIS history going all the way back to when blockchain.com was registered has included the same [email protected] email. If they are not getting notified, they need to update their contact info with Whois Guard.
September 11, 2012, 11:34:33 AM
This person claims to be the owner of blockchain.com:
http://www.facebook.com/fannnnnnnnneww
I contacted them, agreed on a price in Bitcoins, but they:
1. Insisted that I pay the bitcoins first.
2. Refused to use an escrow service.
3. Refused to provide any proof that they actually own the domain.
They also said many strange things during the Skype chat in regards to the domain.
Does anyone know if this person is the real owner or if they can be trusted?
If they don't prove nothing, don't pay.http://www.facebook.com/fannnnnnnnneww
I contacted them, agreed on a price in Bitcoins, but they:
1. Insisted that I pay the bitcoins first.
2. Refused to use an escrow service.
3. Refused to provide any proof that they actually own the domain.
They also said many strange things during the Skype chat in regards to the domain.
Does anyone know if this person is the real owner or if they can be trusted?
hm 23 Years old Female
I think is a fake profile
September 11, 2012, 10:41:12 AM
Blockchain_Helper, since you are following this thread, I sent unrelated email to blockchain.info support and no answer in days, whats up with that?
I'm sure Piuk (Ben) is super busy adding all the new features to the site.
Feel free to email me at help at blockchain.info and I will do my best to help out.
Blockchain_Helper is here to help!
September 11, 2012, 10:39:21 AM
I sent unrelated email to blockchain.info support and no answer in days, whats up with that?
I get that a lot too :/
September 11, 2012, 10:22:01 AM
Blockchain_Helper, since you are following this thread, I sent unrelated email to blockchain.info support and no answer in days, whats up with that?
September 11, 2012, 08:53:09 AM
This person claims to be the owner of blockchain.com:
http://www.facebook.com/fannnnnnnnneww
I contacted them, agreed on a price in Bitcoins, but they:
1. Insisted that I pay the bitcoins first.
2. Refused to use an escrow service.
3. Refused to provide any proof that they actually own the domain.
They also said many strange things during the Skype chat in regards to the domain.
Does anyone know if this person is the real owner or if they can be trusted?
If they don't prove nothing, don't pay. http://www.facebook.com/fannnnnnnnneww
I contacted them, agreed on a price in Bitcoins, but they:
1. Insisted that I pay the bitcoins first.
2. Refused to use an escrow service.
3. Refused to provide any proof that they actually own the domain.
They also said many strange things during the Skype chat in regards to the domain.
Does anyone know if this person is the real owner or if they can be trusted?
September 11, 2012, 08:50:57 AM
This person claims to be the owner of blockchain.com:
http://www.facebook.com/fannnnnnnnneww
I contacted them, agreed on a price in Bitcoins, but they:
1. Insisted that I pay the bitcoins first.
2. Refused to use an escrow service.
3. Refused to provide any proof that they actually own the domain.
They also said many strange things during the Skype chat in regards to the domain.
Does anyone know if this person is the real owner or if they can be trusted?
http://www.facebook.com/fannnnnnnnneww
I contacted them, agreed on a price in Bitcoins, but they:
1. Insisted that I pay the bitcoins first.
2. Refused to use an escrow service.
3. Refused to provide any proof that they actually own the domain.
They also said many strange things during the Skype chat in regards to the domain.
Does anyone know if this person is the real owner or if they can be trusted?
September 07, 2012, 06:12:43 PM
refused to prove ownership of the domain.
That should be very easy and costs them nothing, even changing the whois email would do IMO. I'd say it's some scammer trying to get the bounty.
September 07, 2012, 12:18:46 PM
refused to prove ownership of the domain.
That should be very easy and costs them nothing, even changing the whois email would do IMO. I'd say it's some scammer trying to get the bounty.
September 07, 2012, 12:12:19 PM
I've been put in contact with someone who claims to be the owner of blockchain.com
We agreed on a price, but so far they have:
refused to prove ownership of the domain.
refused to transfer the domain first.
refused to use an escrow service.
refused to provide any trade references.
I don't know if this person is a scammer or not, so this bounty is still available to anyone who puts me in contact with someone who can be confirmed to be the owner of the domain.
We agreed on a price, but so far they have:
refused to prove ownership of the domain.
refused to transfer the domain first.
refused to use an escrow service.
refused to provide any trade references.
I don't know if this person is a scammer or not, so this bounty is still available to anyone who puts me in contact with someone who can be confirmed to be the owner of the domain.
September 07, 2012, 05:47:43 AM
Update,
I will pay $500 for simply putting me in contact with the owner of Blockchain.COM
I will pay this even if the owner doesn't actually sell me the domain.
I will pay $500 for simply putting me in contact with the owner of Blockchain.COM
I will pay this even if the owner doesn't actually sell me the domain.
September 06, 2012, 08:50:30 AM
You should grab blockchain.me
September 05, 2012, 05:40:02 PM
Why do two people want it? Did the .info owner put a bounty on it?
piuk has put a 5BTC bounty on another thread, and before him there was an user looking for it already.
Now this "Blockchain_Helper" wants to contact the owner too, and "World" has replied to every thread about the subject (including this one) with the same message:
Is there any information that can help them to find the owner.thx
September 05, 2012, 02:44:47 PM
Why do two people want it? Did the .info owner put a bounty on it?
piuk has put a 5BTC bounty on another thread, and before him there was an user looking for it already.
Now this "Blockchain_Helper" wants to contact the owner too, and "World" has replied to every thread about the subject (including this one) with the same message:
Is there any information that can help them to find the owner.thx
September 05, 2012, 02:32:34 PM
Why do two people want it? Did the .info owner put a bounty on it?
September 05, 2012, 02:28:27 PM
Is there any information that can help them to find the owner.thx
September 03, 2012, 10:55:01 AM
It's been registered "recently", whatever that means.
September 03, 2012, 06:06:44 AM
I will pay $1,000 USD worth of Bitcoins for the domain blockchain.com (not .info)
The domain registration is private and the owner of the contact email doesn't reply.
If you are the owner, or can contact the owner please PM me.
-----------------Sept-7-2012 Update-------------------------
I will pay $500 USD worth of bitcoin for a simple, verifiable, introduction to the owner of blockchain.com even if he doesn't sell me the domain name.
Phinnaeus Gage, start your detective work!
The domain registration is private and the owner of the contact email doesn't reply.
If you are the owner, or can contact the owner please PM me.
-----------------Sept-7-2012 Update-------------------------
I will pay $500 USD worth of bitcoin for a simple, verifiable, introduction to the owner of blockchain.com even if he doesn't sell me the domain name.
Phinnaeus Gage, start your detective work!
Jump to: