Author

Topic: [10/10/2018] Blockstream Liquid Sidechain Solution for Bitcoin Network Goes Live (Read 192 times)

brand new
Activity: 0
Merit: 0
Hashcash with the implementation of proof-of-work was the model to follow for a cryptocurrency like Bitcoin.
 
 Thanks my friend.
 


In bitcoin we trust
 
Author
Satoshi Nakamoto https://github.com/SatoshiNT0
Owner
[email protected](Whitepaper)
Key PGP F42A D5FF 0661 6569 96AD A1BB E2FE 2010 EE1D 1815

I am
Satoshi Nakamoto
Owner
Whitepaper Bitcoin
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]

🗝 Key PGP ---> F42A D5FF 0661 6569 96AD A1BB E2FE 2010 EE1D 1815
sr. member
Activity: 404
Merit: 362
in bitcoin we trust
Can someone put the address of deeper articles on this project? So far the biggest criticisms I've read have been about centralization. But honestly, I do not understand why this would be bad. The idea of the project is simply to provide liquidity to large players and thereby help make the price the right one. This could even decrease the volatility that occurs in some exchanges with lower volume. The most interesting thing is that by charging a Fee, the project will have to prove much better than the current arbitrage solutions.

this podcast has more detail https://letstalkbitcoin.com/blog/post/the-bitcoin-game-60-dr-adam-back-part-2-liquid
member
Activity: 194
Merit: 29
I'm in love with this project. Much needed solution for the Bitcoin ecosystem.

The article seems to incorrectly  describe how Liquid differs from Lightning -- is it really only channel capacity limitations?
legendary
Activity: 3430
Merit: 3080
So far the biggest criticisms I've read have been about centralization. But honestly, I do not understand why this would be bad. The idea of the project is simply to provide liquidity to large players

There's a certain legitimacy to that argument, but you could equally argue that Liquid is only making an oligopoly (the exchanges) more centralised, which could in the long term break any illusions that the exchanges are as independent as they would like clients to believe.


and thereby help make the price the right one.

If there's a real marketplace for BTC, there's no such thing as a "correct price". Only controlled (i.e. rigged) marketplaces can claim that prices are "correct".


This could even decrease the volatility that occurs in some exchanges with lower volume. The most interesting thing is that by charging a Fee, the project will have to prove much better than the current arbitrage solutions.

The other interesting idea is that you can issue tokens backed by something other than BTC. Exchanges could use that to manage fiat liquidity, and so create a stablecoin in the process. If all the exchanges depended on such a stablecoin for liquidity, the stablecoin itself would be less exposed to 1 exchange going bust (that would still rock the peg seriously, but it need not definitively kill the coin, as would happen to USDT if Bitfinex did actually go bankrupt).

Even better: if that hypothetical stablecoin could be used without using the exchanges themselves, decentralised platforms could use it too. The ultimate would be if atomic swaps between such a stable coin and BTC could happen, then individuals could trade the stablecoin with BTC freely and quickly, and the exchanges could provide the price stability for the stablecoin. In that scenario, you could actually see an improvement in the decentralisation of cryptocurrency exchange; why hold BTC with a 3rd party if you don't need to? The centralised exchanges would end up trading only the stablecoin as a result (probably why this won't happen, but things are heading in that direction one way or another anyway)
hero member
Activity: 672
Merit: 526
Can someone put the address of deeper articles on this project? So far the biggest criticisms I've read have been about centralization. But honestly, I do not understand why this would be bad. The idea of the project is simply to provide liquidity to large players and thereby help make the price the right one. This could even decrease the volatility that occurs in some exchanges with lower volume. The most interesting thing is that by charging a Fee, the project will have to prove much better than the current arbitrage solutions.
full member
Activity: 694
Merit: 108
santacoin.io
The Liquid Network sidechain for the Bitcoin (BTC) blockchain went live on Sept. 27, according to an Oct. 10 post from Blockstream.

Blockstream is a blockchain development company founded in 2014, with Samson Mow as its CSO. The Liquid Network project, first announced in 2015, was then launched by Mow and Joseph Weinberg of Paycase in 2017 in order to allow for better liquidity between Bitcoin exchanges and brokers.

According to Blockstream’s blog post, the Liquid blockchain generated its first block on Sept. 27, 2018 at 1:29 UTC with participation from 23 crypto industry members including Bitfinex, OKCoin, BitMEX, and the SIX Digital Exchange.

The blog post explains that Liquid aims to allow for faster transactions with Bitcoin between businesses and individuals with the use of its features. These include a native Liquid Bitcoin (L-BTC) asset backed by a “two-way peg” to Bitcoin, Issued Assets bringing “bitcoin-like features to traditional assets,” and its Confidential Transaction Technology.

Blockstream’s post also notes that more features will be added in the future, including the integration of the GreenAddress wallet and third-party hardware wallet support from Ledger and Trezor.

According to the FAQ page, the Liquid Network differs from the Lightning Network (LN) — a second-layer solution for Bitcoin — in that its transactions are not “limited in amount to channel capacity.” In July, payment service CoinGate launched an LN trial for 100 merchants, including esports betting websites, online stores with crypto merchandise, and adult entertainment websites.

reference: https://cointelegraph.com/news/blockstreams-liquid-sidechain-solution-for-bitcoin-network-goes-live
Jump to: