But it makes sense, if he stole 0.1 bitcoin, then he should give 0.1 bitcoin back, I'm not a lawyer, but I think that makes sense ... But it's up to the courts to decide that. it may be the case that he does not have enough money to compensate everyone and this is the only way he has to compensate everyone. the court will decide on the best way to proceed. I just worry that India has banned bitcoin so the court will base that fact and decide that everyone should be compensated for rupees
it makes sense if he still has the coins to pay
and I'm pretty amazed at how ...well,hopefull the indian "investors" are-should be happy to get their money back
they are lucky this dude hasn't gambled with the coins in any way,he could have bought some other coin with that and lose
and India didn't ban bitcoins,this Santa Barbara is going to be partially resolved on September 11th,when the final decision will be made over the RBI initiative
