No one is perfect, I prefer to give people the benefit of the doubt, did they made a mistake by including casinos that have a negative reputation in the forum and which have so much evidence brought against them? I think the answer is yes, especially since this is a website fully dedicated to give insightful reviews.
However, they have corrected their mistake and removed them, so as long as they check the rest of their reviews to see if there are not other casinos like this then I think the issue should be settled.
No one is really perfect but you will be blinded if you are a profit-driven review site where the first thing that you will look at is the percentage of your earnings as an affiliate, I'm ok with review sites including their referral link but they should call a spade a spade, it's a very bad alibi because you are forced taking down the review because you are listening to forum users and not investigating the fact.
OP is also spamming this forum for creating three threads to promote your review site, you are not playing fair and breaking the rules.
And when that happens the whole purpose of the review site is forfeited, which is why I prefer to read reviews of real users in the forum as the majority of them are just sharing their experiences playing at a casino without any hidden motive.
