Hello guys, this campaign doesn't belong to 1xBit and just partly copied-pasted from our original thread.
Topic: 1xBit campaign is starting again. (Read 1366 times)
In case someone did not realize yet, today the official 1xbit account reported that the second thread opened with the signature campaign in "Service" section has nothing to do with the project. This two threads it's just a fake and silly joke from some bored user/s:
And, RajaDen is a known bounty cheater with multiple alt accounts. It is possible that he will fill the whole campaign only with his alts.
very likely an alt account from @RajaDen that will fulfill the campaign.an astonishing statement that @RajaDen has a bad reputation for having too many alt accounts.
I still have 210 brand new, 163 newbie, 63 Jr.member, 50 Member, 30 Full.member, 53 SR.member, 25 Hero, 13 Legendary.
but with 1xbit getting more aggressive in creating this campaign, it will be bad for the forum. many scammers will make shitposts.
actually what motives run by 1xbit? because I'm sure the site will not get victims to play on their site from the forum members. why are they running so many campaigns on the forums?
Bumps
1xbit bounty thread new are here Bounties (Altcoins)
1. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/1xbitcom-signature-campaignup-to-120users-can-wd-no-kyc-5398609
Thanks for bringing to our attention1xbit bounty thread new are here Bounties (Altcoins)
1. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/1xbitcom-signature-campaignup-to-120users-can-wd-no-kyc-5398609
Every member who participates in promoting the scam and the starter of the post will receive red trust. Most accounts have red tags already, but I will add them just to reaffirm that I have zero tolerance towards the 1xbit scam,
Bumps
1xbit bounty thread new are here Bounties (Altcoins)
1. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/1xbitcom-signature-campaignup-to-120users-can-wd-no-kyc-5398609
2. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/1xbitcom-bounty-campaign-1-btc-and-bonus-reward-1k-usdt-duration-4-weeks-5398685
1xbit bounty thread new are here Bounties (Altcoins)
1. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/1xbitcom-signature-campaignup-to-120users-can-wd-no-kyc-5398609
2. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/1xbitcom-bounty-campaign-1-btc-and-bonus-reward-1k-usdt-duration-4-weeks-5398685
Oh great. Just what we needed. Here comes more spam from 1xBit army of sock-puppets.
It looks like the newbie 1xbitpatnar started the same campaign in the Services section as well: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/1xbitcom-signature-campaignup-to-120users-can-wd-no-kyc-5398617
And, RajaDen is a known bounty cheater with multiple alt accounts. It is possible that he will fill the whole campaign only with his alts.
Bumps
1xbit bounty thread new are here Bounties (Altcoins)
1. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/1xbitcom-signature-campaignup-to-120users-can-wd-no-kyc-5398609
2. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/1xbitcom-bounty-campaign-1-btc-and-bonus-reward-1k-usdt-duration-4-weeks-5398685
1xbit bounty thread new are here Bounties (Altcoins)
1. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/1xbitcom-signature-campaignup-to-120users-can-wd-no-kyc-5398609
1xbit.com is looking to advertise their new promotion BIG 5 - Five Championship-Five Bitcoins. To help spread the word we would like to hire users from Member to legendary rank (Mostly Hero/Legendary) to help us out. If you post frequently in Gambling boards, we want to hire you.
1xbit.com
Signature Campaign
Rewards:
5x member. 40$ week
10x member. 60$ week
15x Sr Member: 80$ week
20x Hero Member: 100$ week
25x Legendary Member: 120$ week
1xbit.com
Signature Campaign
Rewards:
5x member. 40$ week
10x member. 60$ week
15x Sr Member: 80$ week
20x Hero Member: 100$ week
25x Legendary Member: 120$ week
1xbit.com is looking to advertise their new promotion BIG 5 - Five Championship-Five Bitcoins. To help spread the word we would like to hire users from Member to legendary rank (Mostly Hero/Legendary) to help us out. If you post frequently in Gambling boards, we want to hire you.
1xbit.com
Signature Campaign
Rewards:
5 jr.member. 30$ week
10x member. 40$ week
15x member. 60$ week
20x Sr Member: 80$ week
25x Hero Member: 100$ week
25x Legendary Member: 120$ week
1xbit.com
Signature Campaign
Rewards:
5 jr.member. 30$ week
10x member. 40$ week
15x member. 60$ week
20x Sr Member: 80$ week
25x Hero Member: 100$ week
25x Legendary Member: 120$ week
Oh please, this is getting boring.
After all, you know very well that such rules must be made in the event that the casino is controlled by the police or other government services. This is a standard rule in the ToS of (probably all) casinos and bookmakers regarding money laundering (AML).
As you suffering from Dementia?After all, you know very well that such rules must be made in the event that the casino is controlled by the police or other government services. This is a standard rule in the ToS of (probably all) casinos and bookmakers regarding money laundering (AML).
You said the scam casino you advertise is fully anonymous
I saw that someone already asked 1xbit support about the name of the company and the exact address.
From what I can remember, the answer was that the cryptocurrency market is based on anonymity. They value users anonymity as much as their own. Therefore, they do not reveal the data of either users or theirs. Everyone has a choice whether they want to use a fully anonymous casino, or prefer one that requires KYC verification.
From what I can remember, the answer was that the cryptocurrency market is based on anonymity. They value users anonymity as much as their own. Therefore, they do not reveal the data of either users or theirs. Everyone has a choice whether they want to use a fully anonymous casino, or prefer one that requires KYC verification.
And I pointed out how they will ask for your documents at any time they want. What are you prattling about?
Do you even know what "fully anonymous" means?
I saw that someone already asked 1xbit support about the name of the company and the exact address.
From what I can remember, the answer was that the cryptocurrency market is based on anonymity. They value users anonymity as much as their own. Therefore, they do not reveal the data of either users or theirs. Everyone has a choice whether they want to use a fully anonymous casino, or prefer one that requires KYC verification.
They don't want to say it because they know how bad everything behind them is. Just do a little digging. You will get to know about the real owners.From what I can remember, the answer was that the cryptocurrency market is based on anonymity. They value users anonymity as much as their own. Therefore, they do not reveal the data of either users or theirs. Everyone has a choice whether they want to use a fully anonymous casino, or prefer one that requires KYC verification.
Fully anonymous casino?
Read their Privacy policy - https://1xbit.com/information/rules/
Quote
The company collects and keeps the passport or other ID of the User, and reports on all changes made in the account;
The company monitors any suspicious activity on the User's account, as well as operations carried out under special conditions;
The company has the right to ban the User at any time, if the Company has grounds for supposing that this operation has any relation to money laundering and criminal activity. In accordance with international law the Company is not obliged to inform the User about his suspicious activity and let him know that it has been passed to relevant authorities.
In accordance with the internal AML procedures the Company performs initial and ongoing personal identity verification procedures as provided by the level of risk of each User.
The company will ask you to provide the minimal information to confirm your identity.
The company will record and preserve all data and ID, as well as which methods of confirmation have been used and the results of verification procedures.
The company will check your personal data to match the list of persons suspected of terrorism, which is formed by the authorized state and independent authorities. A minimum set of identification data includes: the User's full name; date of birth (for individuals); residential address or registered address of the User;
sources of funds that you plan to Deposit into the account.
To verify and confirm the authenticity of the above-mentioned data, the Company may require the following documents:
passport or identification card, or other document equivalent that meets the following requirements:
passport or identification card, or other document equivalent that meets the following requirements: contains the name, date of birth and a photograph of the document holder;
issued by the national public authorities, a recently obtained receipt for the payment of utility bills (not older than 3 months) or other documents confirming the address of the User.
The company may also require other additional information, confirmed by relevant documents. In certain cases, the Company may also require not arised copies of documents from the User.
The company monitors any suspicious activity on the User's account, as well as operations carried out under special conditions;
The company has the right to ban the User at any time, if the Company has grounds for supposing that this operation has any relation to money laundering and criminal activity. In accordance with international law the Company is not obliged to inform the User about his suspicious activity and let him know that it has been passed to relevant authorities.
In accordance with the internal AML procedures the Company performs initial and ongoing personal identity verification procedures as provided by the level of risk of each User.
The company will ask you to provide the minimal information to confirm your identity.
The company will record and preserve all data and ID, as well as which methods of confirmation have been used and the results of verification procedures.
The company will check your personal data to match the list of persons suspected of terrorism, which is formed by the authorized state and independent authorities. A minimum set of identification data includes: the User's full name; date of birth (for individuals); residential address or registered address of the User;
sources of funds that you plan to Deposit into the account.
To verify and confirm the authenticity of the above-mentioned data, the Company may require the following documents:
passport or identification card, or other document equivalent that meets the following requirements:
passport or identification card, or other document equivalent that meets the following requirements: contains the name, date of birth and a photograph of the document holder;
issued by the national public authorities, a recently obtained receipt for the payment of utility bills (not older than 3 months) or other documents confirming the address of the User.
The company may also require other additional information, confirmed by relevant documents. In certain cases, the Company may also require not arised copies of documents from the User.
Oh please, this is getting boring.
After all, you know very well that such rules must be made in the event that the casino is controlled by the police or other government services. This is a standard rule in the ToS of (probably all) casinos and bookmakers regarding money laundering (AML).
I don't know why you spend your time and energy writing about 1xBet.
1xBit has officially stated that it has nothing to do with 1xBet.
I think that before someone starts writing nonsense, they should check whether the source of their information is trustworthy and what it is based on.
Well, I just mentioned 1xbet being a scam casino too and as usual, a 1xbit ass licking dog came out backing senselessly. I didn't even talk about 1xbit 1xBit has officially stated that it has nothing to do with 1xBet.
I think that before someone starts writing nonsense, they should check whether the source of their information is trustworthy and what it is based on.
But since you think you are smart, you should have used Google before I told you to do so.
Go ask your scam bosses which company owns 1xbit, and then we shall proceed from there.
"Ass licking dog"? What a subtlety
I saw that someone already asked 1xbit support about the name of the company and the exact address.
From what I can remember, the answer was that the cryptocurrency market is based on anonymity. They value users anonymity as much as their own. Therefore, they do not reveal the data of either users or theirs. Everyone has a choice whether they want to use a fully anonymous casino, or prefer one that requires KYC verification.
this has been another excuse that this site gives, man I wonder who is the genius behind this site that thought of all these excuses to steal. if a customer asks for their information to be disclosed so that their problem will be resolved then why the hell would the site refuse? whether this can solve the whole problem? then you realize that the site wants to continue robbing people and will use the refund of deposit arguments and that they also don't divulge customer and self information
I saw that someone already asked 1xbit support about the name of the company and the exact address.
From what I can remember, the answer was that the cryptocurrency market is based on anonymity. They value users anonymity as much as their own. Therefore, they do not reveal the data of either users or theirs. Everyone has a choice whether they want to use a fully anonymous casino, or prefer one that requires KYC verification.
They don't want to say it because they know how bad everything behind them is. Just do a little digging. You will get to know about the real owners.From what I can remember, the answer was that the cryptocurrency market is based on anonymity. They value users anonymity as much as their own. Therefore, they do not reveal the data of either users or theirs. Everyone has a choice whether they want to use a fully anonymous casino, or prefer one that requires KYC verification.
Fully anonymous casino?
Read their Privacy policy - https://1xbit.com/information/rules/
Quote
The company collects and keeps the passport or other ID of the User, and reports on all changes made in the account;
The company monitors any suspicious activity on the User's account, as well as operations carried out under special conditions;
The company has the right to ban the User at any time, if the Company has grounds for supposing that this operation has any relation to money laundering and criminal activity. In accordance with international law the Company is not obliged to inform the User about his suspicious activity and let him know that it has been passed to relevant authorities.
In accordance with the internal AML procedures the Company performs initial and ongoing personal identity verification procedures as provided by the level of risk of each User.
The company will ask you to provide the minimal information to confirm your identity.
The company will record and preserve all data and ID, as well as which methods of confirmation have been used and the results of verification procedures.
The company will check your personal data to match the list of persons suspected of terrorism, which is formed by the authorized state and independent authorities. A minimum set of identification data includes: the User's full name; date of birth (for individuals); residential address or registered address of the User;
sources of funds that you plan to Deposit into the account.
To verify and confirm the authenticity of the above-mentioned data, the Company may require the following documents:
passport or identification card, or other document equivalent that meets the following requirements:
passport or identification card, or other document equivalent that meets the following requirements: contains the name, date of birth and a photograph of the document holder;
issued by the national public authorities, a recently obtained receipt for the payment of utility bills (not older than 3 months) or other documents confirming the address of the User.
The company may also require other additional information, confirmed by relevant documents. In certain cases, the Company may also require not arised copies of documents from the User.
The company monitors any suspicious activity on the User's account, as well as operations carried out under special conditions;
The company has the right to ban the User at any time, if the Company has grounds for supposing that this operation has any relation to money laundering and criminal activity. In accordance with international law the Company is not obliged to inform the User about his suspicious activity and let him know that it has been passed to relevant authorities.
In accordance with the internal AML procedures the Company performs initial and ongoing personal identity verification procedures as provided by the level of risk of each User.
The company will ask you to provide the minimal information to confirm your identity.
The company will record and preserve all data and ID, as well as which methods of confirmation have been used and the results of verification procedures.
The company will check your personal data to match the list of persons suspected of terrorism, which is formed by the authorized state and independent authorities. A minimum set of identification data includes: the User's full name; date of birth (for individuals); residential address or registered address of the User;
sources of funds that you plan to Deposit into the account.
To verify and confirm the authenticity of the above-mentioned data, the Company may require the following documents:
passport or identification card, or other document equivalent that meets the following requirements:
passport or identification card, or other document equivalent that meets the following requirements: contains the name, date of birth and a photograph of the document holder;
issued by the national public authorities, a recently obtained receipt for the payment of utility bills (not older than 3 months) or other documents confirming the address of the User.
The company may also require other additional information, confirmed by relevant documents. In certain cases, the Company may also require not arised copies of documents from the User.
---
I sort of prefer one that will pay my winnings and selectively scam me, but I may just be some weird dude I don't know why you spend your time and energy writing about 1xBet.
1xBit has officially stated that it has nothing to do with 1xBet.
I think that before someone starts writing nonsense, they should check whether the source of their information is trustworthy and what it is based on.
Well, I just mentioned 1xbet being a scam casino too and as usual, a 1xbit ass licking dog came out backing senselessly. I didn't even talk about 1xbit 1xBit has officially stated that it has nothing to do with 1xBet.
I think that before someone starts writing nonsense, they should check whether the source of their information is trustworthy and what it is based on.
But since you think you are smart, you should have used Google before I told you to do so.
Go ask your scam bosses which company owns 1xbit, and then we shall proceed from there.
"Ass licking dog"? What a subtlety
I saw that someone already asked 1xbit support about the name of the company and the exact address.
From what I can remember, the answer was that the cryptocurrency market is based on anonymity. They value users anonymity as much as their own. Therefore, they do not reveal the data of either users or theirs. Everyone has a choice whether they want to use a fully anonymous casino, or prefer one that requires KYC verification.
I don't know why you spend your time and energy writing about 1xBet.
1xBit has officially stated that it has nothing to do with 1xBet.
I think that before someone starts writing nonsense, they should check whether the source of their information is trustworthy and what it is based on.
Well, I just mentioned 1xbet being a scam casino too and as usual, a 1xbit ass licking dog came out backing senselessly. I didn't even talk about 1xbit 1xBit has officially stated that it has nothing to do with 1xBet.
I think that before someone starts writing nonsense, they should check whether the source of their information is trustworthy and what it is based on.
But since you think you are smart, you should have used Google before I told you to do so.
Go ask your scam bosses which company owns 1xbit, and then we shall proceed from there.
Just because 1xbit said something, does it automatically means that's true? Yes, maybe on paper it's different companies registered in offshore, but there is more than enough proofs about connection between 1xbit and 1xbet.
And even if they're not connected, it doesn't makes 1xbit legit website.
And even if they're not connected, it doesn't makes 1xbit legit website.
In fact, there is no evidence to indicate there is a different company at all. Neither on paper nor elsewhere.
I don't know why you spend your time and energy writing about 1xBet.
1xBit has officially stated that it has nothing to do with 1xBet.
I think that before someone starts writing nonsense, they should check whether the source of their information is trustworthy and what it is based on.
And I can oficially say that if you send me 1BTC I'll send you 2BTC back; but we all know what would happen 1xBit has officially stated that it has nothing to do with 1xBet.
I think that before someone starts writing nonsense, they should check whether the source of their information is trustworthy and what it is based on.
I dont get your point
Besides, there are many open scam accussations against both 1xbet and 1xbit, so maybe it's you who hasn't done their due diligence before promoting a service, pal
Check this list and provide the ones that stay unanswered:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.56150537
I don't know why you spend your time and energy writing about 1xBet.
1xBit has officially stated that it has nothing to do with 1xBet.
I think that before someone starts writing nonsense, they should check whether the source of their information is trustworthy and what it is based on.
Just because 1xbit said something, does it automatically means that's true? Yes, maybe on paper it's different companies registered in offshore, but there is more than enough proofs about connection between 1xbit and 1xbet.1xBit has officially stated that it has nothing to do with 1xBet.
I think that before someone starts writing nonsense, they should check whether the source of their information is trustworthy and what it is based on.
Of course, one word is not a fact. If you have or can find any evidence that 1xBit and 1xBet are connected in some way, please provide it.
And even if they're not connected, it doesn't makes 1xbit legit website.
I didn't write anything like that. I just don't understand why you are comparing two different companies in this thread.
I don't know why you spend your time and energy writing about 1xBet.
1xBit has officially stated that it has nothing to do with 1xBet.
I think that before someone starts writing nonsense, they should check whether the source of their information is trustworthy and what it is based on.
Just because 1xbit said something, does it automatically means that's true? Yes, maybe on paper it's different companies registered in offshore, but there is more than enough proofs about connection between 1xbit and 1xbet.1xBit has officially stated that it has nothing to do with 1xBet.
I think that before someone starts writing nonsense, they should check whether the source of their information is trustworthy and what it is based on.
And even if they're not connected, it doesn't makes 1xbit legit website.
I don't know why you spend your time and energy writing about 1xBet.
1xBit has officially stated that it has nothing to do with 1xBet.
I think that before someone starts writing nonsense, they should check whether the source of their information is trustworthy and what it is based on.
And I can oficially say that if you send me 1BTC I'll send you 2BTC back; but we all know what would happen 1xBit has officially stated that it has nothing to do with 1xBet.
I think that before someone starts writing nonsense, they should check whether the source of their information is trustworthy and what it is based on.
Besides, there are many open scam accussations against both 1xbet and 1xbit, so maybe it's you who hasn't done their due diligence before promoting a service, pal
Not sure whether participants are still getting red-painted, but there's 3 accepted members in the latest campaign that are still untagged (not anymore after this is posted tho).
Tagged.If you come across anytime. Just keep bringing them up here.
I'm not sure about this but 1xbet is a reputable fiat gambling site in my country and I've used it more times than I can remember because of their fast payouts and betting options. I never had any problem with them they are also top sponsors of some European clubs so I doubt they are running Illegal business.
1xbet is scam too. Just because they sponsor top clubs doesn't make them angels. Some clubs even pulled out.From Wiki
Quote
As of May 2021, 1xBet has amassed over 1,290,0000 search results on Google for the term "1xBet Scam"; retaining its reputation as one of the world's most controversial betting firms and featuring on Russia's payment processor blacklist.[23] It provides an affiliate system to delegate its advertising onto unwitting clients.
I don't know why you spend your time and energy writing about 1xBet.
1xBit has officially stated that it has nothing to do with 1xBet.
I think that before someone starts writing nonsense, they should check whether the source of their information is trustworthy and what it is based on.
Not sure whether participants are still getting red-painted, but there's 3 accepted members in the latest campaign that are still untagged (not anymore after this is posted tho).
Tagged.If you come across anytime. Just keep bringing them up here.
I'm not sure about this but 1xbet is a reputable fiat gambling site in my country and I've used it more times than I can remember because of their fast payouts and betting options. I never had any problem with them they are also top sponsors of some European clubs so I doubt they are running Illegal business.
1xbet is scam too. Just because they sponsor top clubs doesn't make them angels. Some clubs even pulled out.From Wiki
Quote
As of May 2021, 1xBet has amassed over 1,290,0000 search results on Google for the term "1xBet Scam"; retaining its reputation as one of the world's most controversial betting firms and featuring on Russia's payment processor blacklist.[23] It provides an affiliate system to delegate its advertising onto unwitting clients.
BTW, some clubs ended their partnership with 1xbet after some allegations:
https://www.sportspromedia.com/news/chelsea-and-liverpool-join-spurs-in-dumping-1xbet-sponsorship/
Meanwhile, CZ/Binance is among those that don't have issues taking money from scammers, which is no surprise considering the kind of crap that gets listed there on the regular basis.
It's very funny to see such statements from their manager.
I do check the participants but if someone Finds any of these Participants [Cheating / Multi Accounting] in the campaign then reporting them before Week's payment will get you a percentage of user's weekly payment if they met their quota.
Has anyone seen that previously discovered alternate accounts have been removed from their company?
There was a lot of evidence that cheaters were involved in this signature, but they still advertise this shit to this day.
Lies from start to finish, from managers to participants.
By the way, their fee is getting smaller and smaller.
I do check the participants but if someone Finds any of these Participants [Cheating / Multi Accounting] in the campaign then reporting them before Week's payment will get you a percentage of user's weekly payment if they met their quota.
Has anyone seen that previously discovered alternate accounts have been removed from their company?
There was a lot of evidence that cheaters were involved in this signature, but they still advertise this shit to this day.
Lies from start to finish, from managers to participants.
By the way, their fee is getting smaller and smaller.
Yes ,sorry a little late to update ,Now the Thread has been updated and of the 3 accounts have been marked respectively by you -1
Not sure whether participants are still getting red-painted, but there's 3 accepted members in the latest campaign that are still untagged (not anymore after this is posted tho).
Fritwakky --- Full Member
TheEconomists --- Member
Trojane--- Member
Most likely throwaway accounts, but it's interesting to note that both member accounts have earnt all their merits, so there may be some sort of funny connection there I wouldn't really know how to explore
Fritwakky --- Full Member
TheEconomists --- Member
Trojane--- Member
Most likely throwaway accounts, but it's interesting to note that both member accounts have earnt all their merits, so there may be some sort of funny connection there I wouldn't really know how to explore
they seem to be tireless with opening new accounts and starting with a new signature campaign.
I don't think they get tired. The fact that they will open new, short-term signature campaigns has been announced long time ago:
We just launched a 1-week signature campaign - this will be one of many others upcoming soon.
As for the new account, it's probably the result of this recruitation:
also we are open for campaign manager applications for further campaigns in pm.
I've tagged the user and create a flag type 3 here, need more DT members to make the flag shown https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2863
For the record: that's a type 1 Flag. 
Another 1xbit signature campaign [1xBit] - CSGO: PGL MAJOR 2021 - Signature Campaign managed by brand new user instead of using his old main accounts.
I've tagged the user and create a flag type 3 here, need more DT members to make the flag shown https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2863
I've tagged the user and create a flag type 3 here, need more DT members to make the flag shown https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2863
I don't know where are you from, but 1xbet have probably worst reputation around the world from all big bookmakers. Maybe you didn't have any issue with them, but you're lucky because it's difficult to find positive reviews about 1xbet.
Nope, I've saw many positive reviews about 1xbet in youtube which mostly paid shills and some article do write good reviews about 1xbet. But if you check on trustpilot and read the comment section of 1xbet social media, you'll see many people complaining about pending withdrawal.Supported this flag.
they seem to be tireless with opening new accounts and starting with a new signature campaign. I'm not sure what they expect from this strategy.
although it seems that he will be left without participants in the campaign, and they stopped paying them. I can't say I'm sorry or have any empathy for their problem.
First, answer why you scammed participants of the other signature campaign and did not pay for the last week:
My honest review:
1xBit run signature campaign: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/1xbitcom-signature-campaign-over-5339884
1xBit closed signature campaign October 26, but they scammed their participants by not paying for last week (October 19 - October 25):
Edited: Screenshot shows that at the time of publishing the post with the information about closing signature campaign, in the topic of the thread was "(full)" - means is open but no more spots. Bitcointalk saves topic, and if the topic changes, it show up in next post. Topic of the thread was changed to "(over)" after publishing that post. It perfectly shows when exactly campaign was closed (after publishing that post, so October 26) and the manager and the support team were fully aware of this.
It means that they must pay for week 22 from October 19 to October 25 but they didn't
In my opinion, this casino is not trustworthy because they did not keep their word.
My address: bc1qyjk5xcrvkc4t9x452wdxdu3t2ps7rmu3c60wz7
1xBit run signature campaign: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/1xbitcom-signature-campaign-over-5339884
1xBit closed signature campaign October 26, but they scammed their participants by not paying for last week (October 19 - October 25):
Edited: Screenshot shows that at the time of publishing the post with the information about closing signature campaign, in the topic of the thread was "(full)" - means is open but no more spots. Bitcointalk saves topic, and if the topic changes, it show up in next post. Topic of the thread was changed to "(over)" after publishing that post. It perfectly shows when exactly campaign was closed (after publishing that post, so October 26) and the manager and the support team were fully aware of this.
It means that they must pay for week 22 from October 19 to October 25 but they didn't
In my opinion, this casino is not trustworthy because they did not keep their word.
My address: bc1qyjk5xcrvkc4t9x452wdxdu3t2ps7rmu3c60wz7
Another 1xbit signature campaign [1xBit] - CSGO: PGL MAJOR 2021 - Signature Campaign managed by brand new user instead of using his old main accounts.
I've tagged the user and create a flag type31 here, need more DT members to make the flag shown https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2863
I've tagged the user and create a flag type
I don't know where are you from, but 1xbet have probably worst reputation around the world from all big bookmakers. Maybe you didn't have any issue with them, but you're lucky because it's difficult to find positive reviews about 1xbet.
Nope, I've saw many positive reviews about 1xbet in youtube which mostly paid shills and some article do write good reviews about 1xbet. But if you check on trustpilot and read the comment section of 1xbet social media, you'll see many people complaining about pending withdrawal. I'm not sure about this but 1xbet is a reputable fiat gambling site in my country and I've used it more times than I can remember because of their fast payouts and betting options. I never had any problem with them they are also top sponsors of some European clubs so I doubt they are running Illegal business.
I don't know where are you from, but 1xbet have probably worst reputation around the world from all big bookmakers. Maybe you didn't have any issue with them, but you're lucky because it's difficult to find positive reviews about 1xbet.And fact that they're sponsors of some football clubs and leagues doesn't makes them legit. They spend huge money for marketing to make better image about themselves. Some people will think that sponsor of Barcelona can't be scam.
BTW, some clubs ended their partnership with 1xbet after some allegations:
https://www.sportspromedia.com/news/chelsea-and-liverpool-join-spurs-in-dumping-1xbet-sponsorship/
considering their affiliation with the 1XBET casino
Note that 1xBET is not the same as 1xBit! The former is (as far as I know) legit, the latter is a scam.As far as I know, 1XBit is an unlicensed affiliate of 1XBET. Whether they are the same owners or not, I am not sure. But I know all the important stuff is controlled by 1XBET.
From what I have seen, 1XBET is blocked in many countries, so it makes sense that 1xbit would deny any association with them. But the evidence is overwhelming.
considering their affiliation with the 1XBET casino
Note that 1xBET is not the same as 1xBit! The former is (as far as I know) legit, the latter is a scam.As far as I know, 1XBit is an unlicensed affiliate of 1XBET. Whether they are the same owners or not, I am not sure. But I know all the important stuff is controlled by 1XBET.
#1xBet
https://imgur.com/a/u6geWCf
https://imgur.com/a/Oi4OUgf
#1xBit
https://imgur.com/a/49iUH2O
https://imgur.com/a/P9I8HBv
My assumption is that both gambling sites are probably scams.
This is just a personal opinion, although there is no guarantee the pilot's trust rating with random comments is genuine.
Quite interesting! Outside the bitcointalk forums, 1xBit gets more green gems than 1xBet. while the real evidence on the bitcointalk forum very clearly shows that 1xBit is the worst gambling site compared to other gambling sites.
considering their affiliation with the 1XBET casino
Note that 1xBET is not the same as 1xBit! The former is (as far as I know) legit, the latter is a scam.As far as I know, 1XBit is an unlicensed affiliate of 1XBET. Whether they are the same owners or not, I am not sure. But I know all the important stuff is controlled by 1XBET.
From what I have seen, 1XBET is blocked in many countries, so it makes sense that 1xbit would deny any association with them. But the evidence is overwhelming.
I was also closing checking the spreadsheet once the first week of the new campaign was over. I had seen that many new members applied in the campaign but they did not accepted them in this week, means they have not added any new member in the campaign. First they reduced the pay and now they not accepting more participants suggest they are running out of funds and soon may disappear from this forum.
The campaign is not helping the reputation of the 1XBIT, bad for those who sacrificed their trust rating two or three months of pay, they will have to wait for a new casino or any other projects with a bad reputation to accept them, they might turn the campaign to monthly payment then they will eventually scam participants, this is possible.
considering their affiliation with the 1XBET casino
Note that 1xBET is not the same as 1xBit! The former is (as far as I know) legit, the latter is a scam. Done. Just keep telling us. I don't follow the thread, but I will leave negative trust to all those who wear the signature, although as I said before, if someone changes their mind quickly and removes the signature, I am willing to change the tag.
I have referenced an archive link. I'm going to get into the habit of doing it this way from now on. That way, even if they delete the original post, you can see what they wrote.
The last few days I deliberately didn't update this thread And I waiting for the list of accepted participants in week #1. I will always update this thread when I find a new entrant list.I have referenced an archive link. I'm going to get into the habit of doing it this way from now on. That way, even if they delete the original post, you can see what they wrote.
I was also closing checking the spreadsheet once the first week of the new campaign was over. I had seen that many new members applied in the campaign but they did not accepted them in this week, means they have not added any new member in the campaign. First they reduced the pay and now they not accepting more participants suggest they are running out of funds and soon may disappear from this forum.
I'm not sure if they're actually running out of funds or not, considering their affiliation with the 1XBET casino they probably have a substantial budget, I'm guessing their gimmicks here aren't delivering the results they expected. Anyway, whatever the case, I will be happy when they finally disappear from the scene.
Done. Just keep telling us. I don't follow the thread, but I will leave negative trust to all those who wear the signature, although as I said before, if someone changes their mind quickly and removes the signature, I am willing to change the tag.
I have referenced an archive link. I'm going to get into the habit of doing it this way from now on. That way, even if they delete the original post, you can see what they wrote.
The last few days I deliberately didn't update this thread And I waiting for the list of accepted participants in week #1. I will always update this thread when I find a new entrant list.I have referenced an archive link. I'm going to get into the habit of doing it this way from now on. That way, even if they delete the original post, you can see what they wrote.
I was also closing checking the spreadsheet once the first week of the new campaign was over. I had seen that many new members applied in the campaign but they did not accepted them in this week, means they have not added any new member in the campaign. First they reduced the pay and now they not accepting more participants suggest they are running out of funds and soon may disappear from this forum.
Done. Just keep telling us. I don't follow the thread, but I will leave negative trust to all those who wear the signature, although as I said before, if someone changes their mind quickly and removes the signature, I am willing to change the tag.
I have referenced an archive link. I'm going to get into the habit of doing it this way from now on. That way, even if they delete the original post, you can see what they wrote.
The last few days I deliberately didn't update this thread And I waiting for the list of accepted participants in week #1. I will always update this thread when I find a new entrant list. I have referenced an archive link. I'm going to get into the habit of doing it this way from now on. That way, even if they delete the original post, you can see what they wrote.
Missed 1
Bitcointalk username: Goldade
Bitcointalk profile url: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/goldade-942753
Rank: Full Member
Current Post Count (including this one): 1142
Btc address: bc1qywv7c8m3pn7kq7f4dvgsc264z8q0mtc63mw422
Bitcointalk profile url: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/goldade-942753
Rank: Full Member
Current Post Count (including this one): 1142
Btc address: bc1qywv7c8m3pn7kq7f4dvgsc264z8q0mtc63mw422
Done. Just keep telling us. I don't follow the thread, but I will leave negative trust to all those who wear the signature, although as I said before, if someone changes their mind quickly and removes the signature, I am willing to change the tag.
I have referenced an archive link. I'm going to get into the habit of doing it this way from now on. That way, even if they delete the original post, you can see what they wrote.
Missed 1
Bitcointalk username: Goldade
Bitcointalk profile url: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/goldade-942753
Rank: Full Member
Current Post Count (including this one): 1142
Btc address: bc1qywv7c8m3pn7kq7f4dvgsc264z8q0mtc63mw422
Bitcointalk profile url: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/goldade-942753
Rank: Full Member
Current Post Count (including this one): 1142
Btc address: bc1qywv7c8m3pn7kq7f4dvgsc264z8q0mtc63mw422
Smokerface: @Community please take it lightly
_BlackStar: I've tagged the participants.
borovichok: That's cool
_BlackStar: But i'm no DT so it's useless
borovichok: Don't stop, You'll be DT one day.
_BlackStar: Sugar, Tea, Rum
you keep doing the same thing again. After your thread Apology to Nutildah (whether or not you have convinced us of sincerity), you try to belittle others again.
why are you doing that?
whether it is a condition for participation in 1xbit sig. campaign? (somehow your negativity coincides with wearing their signature)
you will add that to your sense of humour, but you didn't create a reputation as a fun person. Especially not after everything you've written against other users.
I don't know how you linked that apology thread here,
But in short, I'd say - That apology letter to Nutildah was for my behavior towards him/her.
I clearly said I won't do that to him/her again but never mentioned I won't be sacrificing lambs for my own amusement if they come for it themselves.
It had nothing to do with 1xbit participating, I'm just doing it for my own amusement, I'll drop out of here in case other members find it annoying,
3 DT members say and I won't be part of this thread! (excluding U)
Edit: Oh BlackStar did tag me, but sad he's invisible in my trust list, Maybe it's time i add him to my trust list,
@BlackStar i got you man
Smokerface: @Community please take it lightly
_BlackStar: I've tagged the participants.
borovichok: That's cool
_BlackStar: But i'm no DT so it's useless
borovichok: Don't stop, You'll be DT one day.
_BlackStar: Sugar, Tea, Rum
you keep doing the same thing again. After your thread Apology to Nutildah (whether or not you have convinced us of sincerity), you try to belittle others again.
why are you doing that?
whether it is a condition for participation in 1xbit sig. campaign? (somehow your negativity coincides with wearing their signature)
you will add that to your sense of humour, but you didn't create a reputation as a fun person. Especially not after everything you've written against other users.
I know those tags won't show up because I'm not a DT, but this will give me a bit of information that all of them can't be trusted.
One day you will become DT, this shouldn't stop you from tagging what you feel is wrong that's my advice to you.
Smokerface: @Community please take it lightly
_BlackStar: I've tagged the participants.
borovichok: That's cool
_BlackStar: But i'm no DT so it's useless
borovichok: Don't stop, You'll be DT one day.
_BlackStar: Sugar, Tea, Rum
Turn on the flag for each participant of the 1xbit campaign, is that allowed? If possible, I would really like to support it.
Supporting flag is not allowed although the red tagging is too much but it just okay too, it send a loud message to any manager who may want to work with them in the future to know that the user behind the account is ready to do anything for few cents. I have previously tagged all participants who signed up for the 1xbit campaign. I know those tags won't show up because I'm not a DT, but this will give me a bit of information that all of them can't be trusted.
One day you will become DT, this shouldn't stop you from tagging what you feel is wrong that's my advice to you. 
If there are any scam signature advertisers who were not tagged by any DT member. Just let me know. I will do the honors.
Thanks for your offer, I'll let you know when I find it. I'm not too worried about my tags for those [1xbit participants] which currently don't show up because some DTs have tagged them before. About the flag I'm asking about, it doesn't matter if it's not needed at the moment. Turn on the flag for each participant of the 1xbit campaign, is that allowed? If possible, I would really like to support it.
The negative feedback is enough.Flags are only effective if someone created a topic or an ANN advertising a scam service.
As of now, the scam signature participants are just making posts and not creating ANNs advertising the service. So no need to worry. If any of them created a topic shilling 1xbit. Then a flag would also be appropriate.
I have previously tagged all participants who signed up for the 1xbit campaign. I know those tags won't show up because I'm not a DT, but this will give me a bit of information that all of them can't be trusted.
If there are any scam signature advertisers who were not tagged by any DT member. Just let me know. I will do the honors. Turn on the flag for each participant of the 1xbit campaign, is that allowed? If possible, I would really like to support it.
I have previously tagged all participants who signed up for the 1xbit campaign. I know those tags won't show up because I'm not a DT, but this will give me a bit of information that all of them can't be trusted.
I have previously tagged all participants who signed up for the 1xbit campaign. I know those tags won't show up because I'm not a DT, but this will give me a bit of information that all of them can't be trusted.
Do not worry about it. Members who are not on DT can also give a red tag, it will not show up under "trusted feedback" but one day, when someone includes you in the DT network, your tags will have full effect. As for creating flags, I do not think that is appropriate in this case.
Turn on the flag for each participant of the 1xbit campaign, is that allowed? If possible, I would really like to support it.
I have previously tagged all participants who signed up for the 1xbit campaign. I know those tags won't show up because I'm not a DT, but this will give me a bit of information that all of them can't be trusted.
I have previously tagged all participants who signed up for the 1xbit campaign. I know those tags won't show up because I'm not a DT, but this will give me a bit of information that all of them can't be trusted.
I agree that's not perfect use of trust system. We simply don't have alternative effective ways how to deal with users who promote scams.
Scams are not moderated by the forum and unfortunately even if it's clear scams like Yobit and 1xBit. It's sad that our hands are not free.On the other hand I do not think they care about the tag so sending out red tags do not do any change. Perhaps other campaign could count it but we always have choice of leaving what type of feedback we want to send.
I'm not even sure if their "honest" review campaign is still running.
It was a good joke after all. Many times they has launched their signature campaign. Many people are tagged due to promoting the signature. But they are not stopping yet. So what is the end ? How they could be stopped.
The fact that they are relaunching the campaign and changing terms over and over again means that it's not pulling the results they expected. They will eventually give up after wasting some money. The reputation is still as bad as before.Yobit and cryptotalk also tried so hard but in the end, they just realized it was a waste of time
Well, as they say, better late than never.
They've already stopped holding competitions in games and rounds, and I'm not even sure if their "honest" review campaign is still running. So, I hope you're right and that the scammer will run out of money very soon.
Many times they has launched their signature campaign. Many people are tagged due to promoting the signature. But they are not stopping yet. So what is the end ? How they could be stopped.
The fact that they are relaunching the campaign and changing terms over and over again means that it's not pulling the results they expected. They will eventually give up after wasting some money. The reputation is still as bad as before.Yobit and cryptotalk also tried so hard but in the end, they just realized it was a waste of time
The topic has shifted to the other side.
I'm not sure that we can expose all purchased accounts, although even a blind person can guess that a long sleep and sudden awakening is not a coincidence when there is an opportunity to participate in some interesting, according to cheaters, "project"
For example, bounty. Rangers Protocol Check how many high ranked accounts with a long break in a publication from Indonesia are participating there
I'm not sure that we can expose all purchased accounts, although even a blind person can guess that a long sleep and sudden awakening is not a coincidence when there is an opportunity to participate in some interesting, according to cheaters, "project"
For example, bounty. Rangers Protocol Check how many high ranked accounts with a long break in a publication from Indonesia are participating there
BITCOINTALK ACCOUNTS FOR SALE. VERY CLEAN ACCOUNTS. ESCROW. (https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bitcointalk-accounts-for-sale-very-clean-accounts-escrow-5335715)
Account sales also occur at the thread Indonesian local.junior member, member, full and senior (red trust).
Harga Junior: 1.5 jt
Member: 6.5 juta
Full -- NEGO
telegram: https://t.me/Rudy1993
Harga Junior: 1.5 jt
Member: 6.5 juta
Full -- NEGO
telegram: https://t.me/Rudy1993
HARGA RED TRUST
1. Full Member: 4 jt
2. Senior: 6 jt
konfirm silakan ke telegram: @rudy1993
1. Full Member: 4 jt
2. Senior: 6 jt
konfirm silakan ke telegram: @rudy1993
If calculated in the form of US Dollar. estimated selling price account
1. Jr. Member : $106
2. Member : $462
3. Full Member: $284
4. Senior Member: $426
For the reason that I don't want newbie or other low rank user will have the idea to buy there just like what lovesmayfamilis point out. I will give you just a hint, You can easily see it when you search Bitcointalk Account for Sale.
That's enough. I've seen the website. But I still don't see the point of trying to "hide" something that is easily found by googling "bitcointalk accounts for sale".
Also, the second result that comes up is this one from bitcointalk:
BITCOINTALK ACCOUNTS FOR SALE. VERY CLEAN ACCOUNTS. ESCROW.
We do not make it easier or more difficult for those who want to buy an account by putting the link here. And both the one selling here and the one on the other site have a bad reputation.
Feedback positive and negative are only good use case when you are doing a trade with other party. It used to be leaving feedback for anything even for a statement you do not like but since theymos added flag system and updated the concept of new feedback system back two years ago (more or less) the perception has changed.
I agree that's not perfect use of trust system. We simply don't have alternative effective ways how to deal with users who promote scams.I can only think of one effective method to stop them:
https://talkimg.com/images/2023/09/10/mqU3T.png
If most members followed my example, the effects of their campaigns would be almost nonexistent.
Such thing is impossible. Ok, most of us already know that 1xbit is scam. But big part of forum members have no idea about it and there is no chance that they will put on ignore 1xbit promoters.https://talkimg.com/images/2023/09/10/mqU3T.png
If most members followed my example, the effects of their campaigns would be almost nonexistent.
I will be leaving neutral to all these accounts above.
Following up this. I have received PMs from users and for your information, I left a neutral tag only so please do not get much pressure from it. The neutral helps me to keep a track of those who have joined this campaign. Please do not give me excuse that you joined the campaign and you did not know 1XBit are scammers. This sounds really funny.If most members followed my example, the effects of their campaigns would be almost nonexistent.
Those who will ignore these users already know that 1xBit are scammers and they are not going to be this scam company's customer. Many times they has launched their signature campaign. Many people are tagged due to promoting the signature. But they are not stopping yet. So what is the end ? How they could be stopped.
I can only think of one effective method to stop them:
If most members followed my example, the effects of their campaigns would be almost nonexistent.
hero member
Activity: 2590
Merit: 650
Want top-notch marketing for your project, Hire me
I don't think this will be the right step. Although, if you are good enough at using Internet search, finding similar sites selling accounts is not a problem.
What's the point in starting to list the resources on which accounts are sold? Does this mean that whoever has not bought the current will be able to buy it? After all, we will not be able to prevent them from doing this.
The sellers have become cunning. I remember how one person who had a purchased account and was caught admitted that when selling an account, they have a rule not to change passwords, so as not to attract the attention of DT
What's the point in starting to list the resources on which accounts are sold? Does this mean that whoever has not bought the current will be able to buy it?
After all, we will not be able to prevent them from doing this. The sellers have become cunning. I remember how one person who had a purchased account and was caught admitted that when selling an account, they have a rule not to change passwords, so as not to attract the attention of DT
I believe you are reading beyond what I have said.
I am simply saying that if someone knows about such a website, why keep it a secret?
Account sales are not prohibited but they are somewhat descouraged.
As I have never thought of either buying an account or selling mine, I have not looked for such sites, but I remember seeing someone on the forum selling accounts.
My point is that if you can sell accounts on the forum, why keep the sites that do so secret?
I'm not going to start tagging indiscriminately, I've been on DT for a short time and I want to be sure of what I'm doing before I take action.
1) If the site is publicly announced more opportunists will make use of it for their greed benefit.
2) Is like saying you want to eradicate all the world's corrupt political leaders, cause account sales have been part of this forum right from the beginning before I join when there was a site called Bitcointalk Account price estimator.
Trying to stop it overnight is just a waste of effort.
legendary
Activity: 2436
Merit: 1189
Need Campaign Manager?PM on telegram @sujonali1819
1xBit signature campaign not only promoting their scam service but also they are helping the forum cheaters and account farmers. I guess most of the applicant there are applying more than one account. and since they are accepting the red tagged people , now the old cheater are alive again and entering his/her alts in this campaign.
Many times they has launched their signature campaign. Many people are tagged due to promoting the signature. But they are not stopping yet. So what is the end ? How they could be stopped.
Many times they has launched their signature campaign. Many people are tagged due to promoting the signature. But they are not stopping yet. So what is the end ? How they could be stopped.
I know a website that selling Bitcointalk account in bulk including higher rank member with positive trust.
Maybe we can tag high rank user that recently just active for the purpose of participating on this campaign.
Maybe we can tag high rank user that recently just active for the purpose of participating on this campaign.
I also think that you should expose that website.
For the reason that I don't want newbie or other low rank user will have the idea to buy there just like what lovesmayfamilis point out. I will give you just a hint, You can easily see it when you search Bitcointalk Account for Sale. The website that offering it was a trusted site because they have built-in escrow system so everyone can easily trade without the risk of scamming other party. Most of the account for sale there is a gaming account.
It's up to you if you will exposed it here since those crazy account seller can't be stop no matter what we do here.
I don't think this will be the right step. Although, if you are good enough at using Internet search, finding similar sites selling accounts is not a problem.
What's the point in starting to list the resources on which accounts are sold? Does this mean that whoever has not bought the current will be able to buy it? After all, we will not be able to prevent them from doing this.
The sellers have become cunning. I remember how one person who had a purchased account and was caught admitted that when selling an account, they have a rule not to change passwords, so as not to attract the attention of DT
What's the point in starting to list the resources on which accounts are sold? Does this mean that whoever has not bought the current will be able to buy it?
After all, we will not be able to prevent them from doing this. The sellers have become cunning. I remember how one person who had a purchased account and was caught admitted that when selling an account, they have a rule not to change passwords, so as not to attract the attention of DT
I believe you are reading beyond what I have said.
I am simply saying that if someone knows about such a website, why keep it a secret?
Account sales are not prohibited but they are somewhat descouraged.
As I have never thought of either buying an account or selling mine, I have not looked for such sites, but I remember seeing someone on the forum selling accounts.
My point is that if you can sell accounts on the forum, why keep the sites that do so secret?
I'm not going to start tagging indiscriminately, I've been on DT for a short time and I want to be sure of what I'm doing before I take action.
I know a website that selling Bitcointalk account in bulk including higher rank member with positive trust.
Maybe we can tag high rank user that recently just active for the purpose of participating on this campaign.
Maybe we can tag high rank user that recently just active for the purpose of participating on this campaign.
I also think that you should expose that website.
I don't think this will be the right step. Although, if you are good enough at using Internet search, finding similar sites selling accounts is not a problem.
What's the point in starting to list the resources on which accounts are sold? Does this mean that whoever has not bought the current will be able to buy it?
After all, we will not be able to prevent them from doing this. The sellers have become cunning. I remember how one person who had a purchased account and was caught admitted that when selling an account, they have a rule not to change passwords, so as not to attract the attention of DT
I know a website that selling Bitcointalk account in bulk including higher rank member with positive trust.
Maybe we can tag high rank user that recently just active for the purpose of participating on this campaign.
Maybe we can tag high rank user that recently just active for the purpose of participating on this campaign.
I also think that you should expose that website.
Yeah, many of the applicants are bought account and probably has one owner. By the nature of this campaign, You can have ROI on purchasing account when you join on 1xbit and earn a 2 weeks of salary there. I know a website that selling Bitcointalk account in bulk including higher rank member with positive trust.
Maybe we can tag high rank user that recently just active for the purpose of participating on this campaign.
Maybe we can tag high rank user that recently just active for the purpose of participating on this campaign.
Link to the website please, This is purely for peaceful purposes, I mean no harm.
Look at this, lol:
I have already exposed multiple cases of alt accounts participating in 1xbit campaigns [1, 2, 3], so this is not surprising. Moreover, I wouldn't be surprised to find out that these accounts are all controlled by only a few people, possibly even 1xbit himself.
One of the things that is interesting about 1xbit campaigns is that they are all funded from Binance addresses and most of the money ends up at coins.ph addresses.
Yeah, many of the applicants are bought account and probably has one owner. By the nature of this campaign, You can have ROI on purchasing account when you join on 1xbit and earn a 2 weeks of salary there. I know a website that selling Bitcointalk account in bulk including higher rank member with positive trust.
Maybe we can tag high rank user that recently just active for the purpose of participating on this campaign.
Look at this, lol:
I have already exposed multiple cases of alt accounts participating in 1xbit campaigns [1, 2, 3], so this is not surprising. Moreover, I wouldn't be surprised to find out that these accounts are all controlled by only a few people, possibly even 1xbit himself.
One of the things that is interesting about 1xbit campaigns is that they are all funded from Binance addresses and most of the money ends up at coins.ph addresses.
Look at this, lol:
1XBIT should be good if instead of paying these bounty hunters they should just fix or solve their issues regarding nonpayment and banning accounts with winnings their reputation grade will go up but instead, they included their participants to get tagged, after this campaign these participants should not beg those who tagged them for participating.
Do we really need to have one more topic about 1xBit campaign?
There is already one or more created by JollyGood so in this way it looks to me that we are only giving them more free advertisement.
As the saying goes - there is no such thing as bad publicity.
There is already one or more created by JollyGood so in this way it looks to me that we are only giving them more free advertisement.
As the saying goes - there is no such thing as bad publicity.
I agree. 1xbit is given unnecessary attention every time a member tries to talk about them. There is no bad publicity, but an open proclamation will help the bad guys to gain exposure. But this proclamation is also giving newbies and investors, various insights of how this site had been the reason why major accounts also got tagged as 1xbit's reputation helped ruin those accounts that participated in their campaign due to the dirt that has mudded them.
Listed accounts wearing the scam casino's signatures tagged. If there's any that hasn't received a tag, Just alert us in this thread.
Weekly payouts increased from before, of course allowing many new apps or participants register on the 1xBit campaign!
Weekly payouts are decreased and not increased.
So those who will join 1xbit's signature campaign need to be tagged until they resolve all the complaints.
This is not going to happen. 1xbit claims that they are back in bitcointalk after they have cleared all the issues or are looking to be not-a-scam-campaign but fact is otherwise. Every now and then i see un-resolved accusations against them and they don't show any concern to resolve them.
You forget that several accounts can belong to one person. See how many sleeping accounts wake up at the same time when any interesting company appears in their opinion. How do they know about the appearance of the announcement? Surely here on the forum, some people have several alternative accounts that can resent with us about the unfairness of participating in a fraudulent project, and at the same time, in parallel with another account, participate in this signature.
Well, with the participation of several accounts, a not so deplorable amount will come out, especially when we talk about countries with low earnings.
Well, with the participation of several accounts, a not so deplorable amount will come out, especially when we talk about countries with low earnings.
It's always nice to put this into perspective: there are many countries in which the average income is (much) less than $100 per week.
Per week? Try per month. That source you linked to shows the average income per month. The people living in the bottom ten African countries on the list earn from $38 - $92/month. Getting into a campaign like this crappy one is like winning the lottery for them.Unfortunately nothing can be done besides tagging the participants. And they don't care. I doubt theymos will interfere unless the campaign goes on a spamming spree. By the looks ok if, that won't be the case.
Those who have effed accounts should pile in here. Free money.
Actually that's not possible, unless the red is strictly because of their campaign. I guess that you've missed this post.
$100/week is pretty good money if you already have a fucked up account. Otherwise it is not worth getting your account ruined because you won't be able to join other "legit" campaigns in the future.
Those who have effed accounts should pile in here. Free money.
This campaign is just like real life. You can make good money by providing CP or selling drugs but if you get caught, you'll rot in a jail cell while most legit common jobs won't make shit.
Those who have effed accounts should pile in here. Free money.
This campaign is just like real life. You can make good money by providing CP or selling drugs but if you get caught, you'll rot in a jail cell while most legit common jobs won't make shit.
Do we really need to have one more topic about 1xBit campaign?
There is already one or more created by JollyGood so in this way it looks to me that we are only giving them more free advertisement.
As the saying goes - there is no such thing as bad publicity.
There is already one or more created by JollyGood so in this way it looks to me that we are only giving them more free advertisement.
As the saying goes - there is no such thing as bad publicity.
$100/week is pretty damn low if you ask me.
If you compare with the current "market" for signature campaigns, you'll see that many offer less than that, fixed, per week: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/overview-of-bitcointalk-signature-ad-campaigns-last-update-01-jan-23-615953
Then, as said, "low" depends (too) much on the user's home country.
But I do agree, however: it is "damn low"
if you take into account that you'll ruin a not-bad-at-all account's future for 100$/week in a campaign that surely won't be here for ever (i.e. long enough).And I'll come back to my original "hunch": it also depends on how much these accounts costed, since I am not convinced that it's the original owners who apply there.
$100/week is pretty damn low if you ask me.
It's always nice to put this into perspective: there are many countries in which the average income is (much) less than $100 per week. $100/week is pretty damn low if you ask me.
Make it 4 weeks and it becomes $400 a week. Spam the forum with shitpost, and $400 is easy. It seems low to you since you are in a campaign which is paying up to $300 a week but when the forum average signature campaigns are paying even $50 a week, $100 a week seems very decent to me.Why it's not good practice? Red tag will stop them from joining other campaigns in future and maybe they will think twice before starting to promote 1xbit.
Feedback positive and negative are only good use case when you are doing a trade with other party. It used to be leaving feedback for anything even for a statement you do not like but since theymos added flag system and updated the concept of new feedback system back two years ago (more or less) the perception has changed. It's now like a game. 1xBit will come around, offer the shit posters a good amount of money, they will wear their signature and start trolling around. In the current Feedback system I don't think giving red tag is a good practice, but surely we all can leave neutral and alert good projects not to hire them.
Why it's not good practice? Red tag will stop them from joining other campaigns in future and maybe they will think twice before starting to promote 1xbit.If given a negative feedback to them, sure it will stop them from participating in future signature campaigns (some campaigns allow negative feedback users so far) but how and why will the need for them thinking twice will arise when they will not be left capable of promoting any projects later? I agree with Bitcoingirl on a very slight part of giving neutral because there are 'or may be' some good users who will be left a red tag and will have their account's future opportunities seized from them. I would give a negative to the members who took part again in their new campaign but not the newer ones, I will give them one last chance with a neutral. Though, if 1xbit's signature is not needed on the forum, I think admins should step in like they did in yobit's matter and banned them from advertising here.
One other thing that's striking is how low the rates are for sig campaigns these days (at least if 1xbit's campaign is typical). I guess the days of being able to earn 0.XXXXBTC/post are over, and payment is pegged to USD--and it's a small amount of $ even for Legendary members. $100/week is pretty damn low if you ask me.
For Chipmixer member, I agree, it's low rates 
. But in general, $100 for Legendary isn't bad. In average, most campaigns paying somewhere between $50-$80 for Legendary. Yeah, there is one campaign offering $130, while another giving just $20/week for Legendary.On the other hand, $100 for 1xbit participants isn't something special, considering ruining their reputation and that they won't be able to join other campaigns in future.
But agree, it was good times for participants when payment rates where fixed in BTC without converting it to USD value.
It's now like a game. 1xBit will come around, offer the shit posters a good amount of money, they will wear their signature and start trolling around. In the current Feedback system I don't think giving red tag is a good practice, but surely we all can leave neutral and alert good projects not to hire them.
Why it's not good practice? Red tag will stop them from joining other campaigns in future and maybe they will think twice before starting to promote 1xbit. Pretty sad. I see very old accounts too. Hacked/sold? Possibly.
Maybe, but I didn't see many Legendary accounts applying. I did see that SmokerFace applied, even though he has negative trust that has nothing to do with being associated with the 1xbit campaign (one of the campaign's exceptions to the no-negative trust rule). Ugh.Hands changed of that account pretty much before it applied for betking? So when already given a negative, who cares! He deletes and reposts to save his time, man! He is a billionaire and can't just go on posting like that here forever! (sarcasm)
It's unbelievable to see so many members applying, even though they've got to know that they're going to get negged all to hell because of it. They might get accepted to the 1xbit campaign, but good luck to them trying to join another one once it ends.
Money can buy happiness, here it can buy 1xbit some users who don't care about their profiles but those rates. Points out that many of them being cheaters and if they manage to enroll more than 3 or 5 accounts in that campaign, even those low rates will get them their yearly expenditure worth money (depens on their belonging country).
$100/week is pretty damn low if you ask me.
Uhmm, those were the days when BTC0.00075 were being paid per post, missing them? kidding
Pretty sad. I see very old accounts too. Hacked/sold? Possibly.
Maybe, but I didn't see many Legendary accounts applying. I did see that SmokerFace applied, even though he has negative trust that has nothing to do with being associated with the 1xbit campaign (one of the campaign's exceptions to the no-negative trust rule). Ugh.It's unbelievable to see so many members applying, even though they've got to know that they're going to get negged all to hell because of it. They might get accepted to the 1xbit campaign, but good luck to them trying to join another one once it ends.
One other thing that's striking is how low the rates are for sig campaigns these days (at least if 1xbit's campaign is typical). I guess the days of being able to earn 0.XXXXBTC/post are over, and payment is pegged to USD--and it's a small amount of $ even for Legendary members. $100/week is pretty damn low if you ask me.
Weekly payouts increased from before, of course allowing many new apps or participants register on the 1xBit campaign!
1xbit is bringing signature campaign and some members are ready to join their signature campaign. Because 1xbit's budget is a good amount, which leads to many participants who are interested in wearing 1xbit signature. 1xbit does not take any steps to resolve the allegations against 1xibt, and on the other hand they run a signature campaign in this forum! So those who will join 1xbit's signature campaign need to be tagged until they resolve all the complaints.
Interesting Rules:
I'm doing my part: I removed one of their posts from my self-moderated topic (only because of their signature).
Quote
Negative trust is not allowed*
*users with negative trust for promoting 1xBit can apply
*users with negative trust for promoting 1xBit can apply
I'm doing my part: I removed one of their posts from my self-moderated topic (only because of their signature).
It's now like a game. 1xBit will come around, offer the shit posters a good amount of money, they will wear their signature and start trolling around. In the current Feedback system I don't think giving red tag is a good practice, but surely we all can leave neutral and alert good projects not to hire them.
If anyone else deletes the signature in a short period of time I will change the feedback from negative to neutral. I don't think it is necessary to be angry with someone who makes a mistake, realizes it and corrects the action quickly.
I will be leaving neutral to all these accounts above. 
Edit
BOUNTY : https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/open-restart-of-1xbit-signature-campaign-new-signatures-and-more-spots-5367666
Weekly payouts increased from before, of course allowing many new apps or participants register on the 1xBit campaign!
There are several lists of participants that have not been marked
Good job mate.. I have tag them. I am not a DT member. that's why my tag will work as a negative feedback. my tag will not displayed. BOUNTY : https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/open-restart-of-1xbit-signature-campaign-new-signatures-and-more-spots-5367666
Weekly payouts increased from before, of course allowing many new apps or participants register on the 1xBit campaign!
There are several lists of participants that have not been marked
Which account do you mean, if you are aiming for an account named: @kingangel, created in 2013, @kingangel, not on terrace/for sale, but he is included in the most Alt list on this forum, all classified as the oldest accounts.
I was referring to mm2543363580 (2013), kingangel (2013), StLucifer (2012), Shagnasty (2012). All are very old and have small number of posts. Quite a.. pattern.
I didn't know about kingangel, but I'm not surprised at all.
I think they know about the situation of 1xBit gambling sites and the ugliness in this forum, but they knowingly, continue to apply in the 1xBit campaign, well-deserved warnings (red).
Yeah, that was my hunch too.
Pretty sad. I see very old accounts too. Hacked/sold? Possibly.
Else I'd expect that an user - especially if created in 2013 - would check campaign manager's trust feedback before joining.
Which account do you mean, if you are aiming for an account named: @kingangel, created in 2013, @kingangel, not on terrace/for sale, but he is included in the most Alt list on this forum, all classified as the oldest accounts.Else I'd expect that an user - especially if created in 2013 - would check campaign manager's trust feedback before joining.
I give examples and proof of addresses used by:@kingangel, linked to the account below.
1. Ridi
2. juliepower
Proof:
Hello I want to apply for the article writing job.....
Bitcointalk profile link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/kingangel-162172
Payment method: BTC
Payment Address: bc1qszptzdkpj6z28y7j6fl0rh5llupqalcq40es4q
[ Archive ]Bitcointalk profile link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/kingangel-162172
Payment method: BTC
Payment Address: bc1qszptzdkpj6z28y7j6fl0rh5llupqalcq40es4q
User: Ridi
Position to Apply: Member
Posts Start: 199 (including this post)
Address: bc1qszptzdkpj6z28y7j6fl0rh5llupqalcq40es4q
[ Archive ]Position to Apply: Member
Posts Start: 199 (including this post)
Address: bc1qszptzdkpj6z28y7j6fl0rh5llupqalcq40es4q
User: juliepower
Position to Apply: Member
Posts Start: 167
Address: bc1qszptzdkpj6z28y7j6fl0rh5llupqalcq40es4q
[ Archive ]Position to Apply: Member
Posts Start: 167
Address: bc1qszptzdkpj6z28y7j6fl0rh5llupqalcq40es4q
When viewed from the ETH address used by: @Ridi and @juliepower, also linked to an account named:@goku19
Proof:
Forum Username: juliepower
Rank : Member
Participated Campaigns: Signature Campaign
Bep20 address: 0x70AFB7E6e6552d92871dc1A11Cf25Fe8C614097E
[ Archive ]Rank : Member
Participated Campaigns: Signature Campaign
Bep20 address: 0x70AFB7E6e6552d92871dc1A11Cf25Fe8C614097E
Post by: Ridi
Forum Username: goku19
Telegram Username: @Lordshiva
Participated Campaigns: Signature Campaign
BEP20 Wallet Address: 0x70AFB7E6e6552d92871dc1A11Cf25Fe8C614097E
[ Archive ]Telegram Username: @Lordshiva
Participated Campaigns: Signature Campaign
BEP20 Wallet Address: 0x70AFB7E6e6552d92871dc1A11Cf25Fe8C614097E
From the proof above the actual parent account: @kingangel, it's below.
5 Accounts Connected:
mishra1994
hakanbalta577
subham1
Lordshiva
goku19
Possible Connected Account:
mishra1994u
mishra1994
hakanbalta577
subham1
Lordshiva
goku19
Possible Connected Account:
mishra1994u
I think they know about the situation of 1xBit gambling sites and the ugliness in this forum, but they knowingly, continue to apply in the 1xBit campaign, well-deserved warnings (red).
I've tagged atm only those who are wearing the signature. Will tag the missing ones if they wear it in the future.
Number 4 is missing the profile number:
Thanks for your quick action, newlifebtc profile number has been updated. but sadly he already deleted signatures on his profile including Japones and D-lowNumber 4 is missing the profile number:
If anyone else deletes the signature in a short period of time I will change the feedback from negative to neutral. I don't think it is necessary to be angry with someone who makes a mistake, realizes it and corrects the action quickly.
I've tagged atm only those who are wearing the signature. Will tag the missing ones if they wear it in the future.
Number 4 is missing the profile number:
Thanks for your quick action, newlifebtc profile number has been updated. but sadly he already deleted signatures on his profile including Japones and D-lowNumber 4 is missing the profile number:
Pretty sad. I see very old accounts too. Hacked/sold? Possibly.
Else I'd expect that an user - especially if created in 2013 - would check campaign manager's trust feedback before joining.
There is a possibility between being sold/hacked/accidentally/or maybe there are other reasons. But after I wrote this thread several participants deleted signatures, including Westinhome have realized the error. Else I'd expect that an user - especially if created in 2013 - would check campaign manager's trust feedback before joining.
Pretty sad. I see very old accounts too. Hacked/sold? Possibly.
Else I'd expect that an user - especially if created in 2013 - would check campaign manager's trust feedback before joining.
At least this user doesn't have the signature; I guess that he may stay "under observation" until he does.
Great job! As DT2 your tag already makes the things visible.
Else I'd expect that an user - especially if created in 2013 - would check campaign manager's trust feedback before joining.
1. Bitcointalk name: D-law
At least this user doesn't have the signature; I guess that he may stay "under observation" until he does.
I've tagged atm only those who are wearing the signature. Will tag the missing ones if they wear it in the future.
Great job! As DT2 your tag already makes the things visible.
I've tagged atm only those who are wearing the signature. Will tag the missing ones if they wear it in the future.
Number 4 is missing the profile number:
Anyway, I suppose more people will tag them.
Number 4 is missing the profile number:
4. Bitcointalk name: Newlifebtc
Bitcointalk URl: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile
Rank: member
Bitcointalk URl: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile
Rank: member
Anyway, I suppose more people will tag them.
October 27, 2021
Bounty Manager : Manager1xBit -9
BOUNTY : [open] Restart of 1xBit signature campaign - new signatures and more spots!
Weekly payouts increased from before, of course allowing many new apps or participants register on the 1xBit campaign!
There are several lists of participants that have not been marked
November 04, 2021
Spreadsheet Bounty 1xBit has updated.
D-LAW and Newslifebtc are still promoting the 1xbit.
new participant list : Goldade
1. Bitcointalk name: D-law -1
Bitcointalk profile URL : https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/d-law-3358680
Rank: member
2. Btctalk name: mm2543363580 -2
Btctalk URL: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/mm2543363580-155420
Rank: Full Member
3. Btctalk name: Gosgosking -2
Btctalk URL: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/gosgosking-3348633
Rank : member
4. Bitcointalk name: Newlifebtc -1
Bitcointalk URl: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/newlifebtc-3300239
Rank: member
5. Btctalk name: japones
Btctalk URL: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/japones-2840840
Rank: Member
6. Bitcointalk Username: kingangel -2
Bitcointalk Profile Link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/kingangel-162172
Rank: Member
7. Bitcointalk Username: HUSTLER -3
Bitcointalk Profile Link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/hustler-94488
Rank: Member
8. Bitcointalk Username: Shagnasty -2
Bitcointalk Profile Link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/shagnasty-64822
Rank: Member
9. Bitcointalk Username: StLucifer -2
Bitcointalk Profile Link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/stlucifer-65672
Rank: Member
10. Bitcointalk username: Goldade -1
Bitcointalk profile url: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/goldade-942753
Rank: Full Member
November 08, 2021
Bounty Manager : CryptoGoonie -2
BOUNTY : [1xBit.com] - CSGO: PGL MAJOR 2021 - Signature Campaign [OPEN]
1. Bitcointalk Username: Fritwakky -1
Bitcointalk profile url: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/fritwakky-460553
Rank: Full Member
2. Bitcointalk Username: TheEconomists -1
Bitcointalk profile url: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/theeconomists-1949818
Rank: Member
3. Bitcointalk Username: Trojane -1
Bitcointalk profile url: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/trojane-3360818
Rank: Member
Bounty Manager : Manager1xBit -9
BOUNTY : [open] Restart of 1xBit signature campaign - new signatures and more spots!
Weekly payouts increased from before, of course allowing many new apps or participants register on the 1xBit campaign!
There are several lists of participants that have not been marked
November 04, 2021
Spreadsheet Bounty 1xBit has updated.
D-LAW and Newslifebtc are still promoting the 1xbit.
new participant list : Goldade
1. Bitcointalk name: D-law -1
Bitcointalk profile URL : https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/d-law-3358680
Rank: member
2. Btctalk name: mm2543363580 -2
Btctalk URL: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/mm2543363580-155420
Rank: Full Member
3. Btctalk name: Gosgosking -2
Btctalk URL: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/gosgosking-3348633
Rank : member
4. Bitcointalk name: Newlifebtc -1
Bitcointalk URl: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/newlifebtc-3300239
Rank: member
Btctalk URL: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/japones-2840840
Rank: Member
6. Bitcointalk Username: kingangel -2
Bitcointalk Profile Link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/kingangel-162172
Rank: Member
7. Bitcointalk Username: HUSTLER -3
Bitcointalk Profile Link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/hustler-94488
Rank: Member
8. Bitcointalk Username: Shagnasty -2
Bitcointalk Profile Link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/shagnasty-64822
Rank: Member
9. Bitcointalk Username: StLucifer -2
Bitcointalk Profile Link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/stlucifer-65672
Rank: Member
10. Bitcointalk username: Goldade -1
Bitcointalk profile url: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/goldade-942753
Rank: Full Member
November 08, 2021
Bounty Manager : CryptoGoonie -2
BOUNTY : [1xBit.com] - CSGO: PGL MAJOR 2021 - Signature Campaign [OPEN]
1. Bitcointalk Username: Fritwakky -1
Bitcointalk profile url: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/fritwakky-460553
Rank: Full Member
2. Bitcointalk Username: TheEconomists -1
Bitcointalk profile url: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/theeconomists-1949818
Rank: Member
3. Bitcointalk Username: Trojane -1
Bitcointalk profile url: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/trojane-3360818
Rank: Member
Jump to: