Author

Topic: 1xbit is at it again with bounty and a signature campaign (Read 860 times)

full member
Activity: 1540
Merit: 102
To be honest, most participants who applied (and subsequently got accepted) into the campaign are the ones who have a previously negative-tagged accounts due to their connection with alt account farming.
Shocker, there.  Any signature campaign that accepts red-tagged members is going to be swarmed with applicants of the lowest quality.  If 1xbit had any integrity, they would think twice about letting untrustworthy members advertise for them.

Since all of the accounts linked to Adkinsbet scam are most likely managed by the same person, there is no need to refer to them in the plural.
Even though there have been suspicions before, it is now quite clear. Compare their application time to the campaign (all within a few minutes of each other) and the time of their last activity on the forum to confirm that it is the same person.

I have no idea why 1xBit would hire those accounts. There is no way they can benefit from such promotion at all.
My opinion is that either they don't care about the campaign and who will promote them because they have no intention of paying anyone, or they have something to do with the Adkinsbet scam, so they control those accounts, and the whole campaign is just a cheap theatrical facade.


then why these known adkinsbet accounts are not banned people get banned from the forum for much less than that ?
legendary
Activity: 2912
Merit: 6403
Blackjack.fun
Maybe I'm just being paranoid, cynical, skeptical, or (most likely,) a combination of all three, but it's almost like they planned for red-tagged sockpuppets to make up the majority of applicants. Makes you wonder if there's any affiliation between the folks behind AdkinsBET and 1xbit.

Then I'm being paranoid to thinking they are allowing those accounts to participate in the campaign just as a cover-up as those accounts are actually used by the same people who run the website and there is no real payment going on there but once the week is over they can claim look, we have paid more than 3000$ or whatever in signature earnings, we're legit!!!!! And actually,  I don't see this as a possibility rather I wonder why would anyone think this is not what's happening!

As for the payments for the reviews, I was pretty sure they were going to pay, it was clearly a promo move to gain trust if possible or at least have some comeback on the people accusing them of being scammers, they spend what, like 300$ on all this for those and just one 0.1 BTC from a gullible user that sees them throwing money around would make up for all the costs.

copper member
Activity: 2338
Merit: 4543
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
Or they'll just "cancel" the campaign after the application thread is flooded with scam warning posts. They get a few days of free promotion and can blame the "trolls".

To my surprise they actually payed for the bounty reviews they requested.  I honestly didn't expect a payment, my review was primarily a scam warning, and I gave their newest account a red-tag.  But they honored their word, which is something.  So, maybe they will actually pay the sig campaign participants.

There's something else that strikes me as kind of weird about the sig campaign; the fact that they allow negative-trusted accounts didn't really settle on me at fist, but then when they accepted 5 members of the AtkinsBet Army of Alts that stuck me as weird.  They also left out any restrictions for having multiple accounts registered in the campaign, and more likely than not, those AdkinsBet shills are all sockpuppets of one person.  Maybe I'm just being paranoid, cynical, skeptical, or (most likely,) a combination of all three, but it's almost like they planned for red-tagged sockpuppets to make up the majority of applicants.  Makes you wonder if there's any affiliation between the folks behind AdkinsBET and 1xbit.
legendary
Activity: 3164
Merit: 1127
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
I am not sure they will be paid by the site because basically hiring them will not increase the site's reputation and revenue through new players.

I think they will be paid, this site has money and I don’t really believe that they are concerned with reputation, they can have a lot of new customers every day and they can pay for advertising elsewhere, so they must be angry because a small group of a forum anonymous that they are DT is pressuring them to do the right thing, it must be hurting their ego

People who know the reputation of the site will no longer use the site because of the risk, so what's the point of paying those who are clearly participant who have been negative trust.

honestly i still think that there are people here on the forum who even knowing the situation of this site will still continue using this site


legendary
Activity: 1974
Merit: 1150
To be honest, most participants who applied (and subsequently got accepted) into the campaign are the ones who have a previously negative-tagged accounts due to their connection with alt account farming. They saw an opportunity to apply in a campaign that the owner is previously negative-tagged also.
You are right, I have looked at them one by one and some of them are still untagged.

I find it really appalling to see that they got accepted and they're probably sharing spam or plagiarized messages across the forum.
I am not sure they will be paid by the site because basically hiring them will not increase the site's reputation and revenue through new players. People who know the reputation of the site will no longer use the site because of the risk, so what's the point of paying those who are clearly participant who have been negative trust.
member
Activity: 868
Merit: 63
~
you should visit their signature campaign thread. you'll see a lot of people posting warnings and their opinion about the signature and the website.
I did check the signature campaign thread yes, there is a lot of people warning them about the signature campaign and the website itself.

~
that's hard to tell, they might get paid they might not. besides. I think they are prepared to take a risk if they are still willing to join the campaign and ignoring the red flags presented by other members of the forum. so let them be and if they are not paid, those members who joined will most likely remove the signature themselves.
No, I disagree that it is hard to tell because you just need to know their reputation in this forum to not even consider joining the campaign, why would you risk joining when you know that there is a really big chance that you aren't going to get paid plus you are spreading a scam website if you join their campaign.
legendary
Activity: 1624
Merit: 2594
Top Crypto Casino
To be honest, most participants who applied (and subsequently got accepted) into the campaign are the ones who have a previously negative-tagged accounts due to their connection with alt account farming.
Shocker, there.  Any signature campaign that accepts red-tagged members is going to be swarmed with applicants of the lowest quality.  If 1xbit had any integrity, they would think twice about letting untrustworthy members advertise for them.

Since all of the accounts linked to Adkinsbet scam are most likely managed by the same person, there is no need to refer to them in the plural.
Even though there have been suspicions before, it is now quite clear. Compare their application time to the campaign (all within a few minutes of each other) and the time of their last activity on the forum to confirm that it is the same person.

I have no idea why 1xBit would hire those accounts. There is no way they can benefit from such promotion at all.
My opinion is that either they don't care about the campaign and who will promote them because they have no intention of paying anyone, or they have something to do with the Adkinsbet scam, so they control those accounts, and the whole campaign is just a cheap theatrical facade.
legendary
Activity: 3528
Merit: 7005
Top Crypto Casino
If nothing has changed since the last time the admin wrote that post, then his attitude towards advertising a service that has such reputation will be identical - meaning it will ban their signature, similar to what happened with YoBit in the past.
Yobit popped into my head too when I started reading this thread, though I think 1xbit has a much worse reputation than Yobit does. 

What I'm wondering is whether their campaign is going to continue or not--last time Yobit started a signature campaign it was shut down pretty quickly, although I think part of that was the number of participants they had (it was a lot, but I can't remember exactly how many).  This 1xbit campaign thread doesn't say how many members they'll accept, nor how long the campaign is supposed to run, but hopefully there won't be too many participants.  I hope that, but given that they're paying a pretty good rate for 15 posts a week, I'd imagine there are going to be a lot of applicants.

To be honest, most participants who applied (and subsequently got accepted) into the campaign are the ones who have a previously negative-tagged accounts due to their connection with alt account farming.
Shocker, there.  Any signature campaign that accepts red-tagged members is going to be swarmed with applicants of the lowest quality.  If 1xbit had any integrity, they would think twice about letting untrustworthy members advertise for them.
legendary
Activity: 2520
Merit: 1113
People should post in their signature campaign thread that they are a scam
you should visit their signature campaign thread. you'll see a lot of people posting warnings and their opinion about the signature and the website.

and that anyone who will join their campaign will probably never receive a payment for their efforts.
that's hard to tell, they might get paid they might not. besides. I think they are prepared to take a risk if they are still willing to join the campaign and ignoring the red flags presented by other members of the forum. so let them be and if they are not paid, those members who joined will most likely remove the signature themselves.
hero member
Activity: 2268
Merit: 789
Participants without a red tag will not risk applying their account, maybe some DT will not tag but there's a risk that their account will still be tagged. I guess all of the accepted applicants have a red tag already and I believe 1xbit already sees this coming since in their rules they allowed a red-tagged account to apply.

The reward is quite attractive, but if it would result in the account getting tag, I guess it's not worth to risk.

I don't know how DT would treat this, I saw yobit ran a signature campaign before, and non of the members were tagged IIRC.
Greedy, that is the reason why some people are so interested in risking the reputation of their account and advertising scam site.
If a site can resolve previous scam accusation well then it is unlikely that they will have forum users and contributors going against them. So far the DT have done well and have informed everyone here with active fact and accusation. I thought this would help the community to avoid scammed from the site.

To be honest, most participants who applied (and subsequently got accepted) into the campaign are the ones who have a previously negative-tagged accounts due to their connection with alt account farming. They saw an opportunity to apply in a campaign that the owner is previously negative-tagged also.

I find it really appalling to see that they got accepted and they're probably sharing spam or plagiarized messages across the forum.
legendary
Activity: 2436
Merit: 1189
Need Campaign Manager?PM on telegram @sujonali1819
I don't know how DT would treat this, I saw yobit ran a signature campaign before, and non of the members were tagged IIRC.
Yes, but what was the displayed ads there? It was cryptotalk.org that means they did not displayed directly yobit for why maybe the most reputed member considered it.

But 1xbit is now launching there own campaign by creating new fresh account couple of times. This also one type of cheating that they are fooling people by creating new account instead of using old one which has a lot of red & flag.
legendary
Activity: 1974
Merit: 1150
Participants without a red tag will not risk applying their account, maybe some DT will not tag but there's a risk that their account will still be tagged. I guess all of the accepted applicants have a red tag already and I believe 1xbit already sees this coming since in their rules they allowed a red-tagged account to apply.

The reward is quite attractive, but if it would result in the account getting tag, I guess it's not worth to risk.

I don't know how DT would treat this, I saw yobit ran a signature campaign before, and non of the members were tagged IIRC.
Greedy, that is the reason why some people are so interested in risking the reputation of their account and advertising scam site.
If a site can resolve previous scam accusation well then it is unlikely that they will have forum users and contributors going against them. So far the DT have done well and have informed everyone here with active fact and accusation. I thought this would help the community to avoid scammed from the site.
hero member
Activity: 2856
Merit: 667
Participants without a red tag will not risk applying their account, maybe some DT will not tag but there's a risk that their account will still be tagged. I guess all of the accepted applicants have a red tag already and I believe 1xbit already sees this coming since in their rules they allowed a red-tagged account to apply.

The reward is quite attractive, but if it would result in the account getting tag, I guess it's not worth to risk.

I don't know how DT would treat this, I saw yobit ran a signature campaign before, and non of the members were tagged IIRC.
copper member
Activity: 2170
Merit: 1827
Top Crypto Casino
Compiled a more structured list, where the default trust is marked, through the code ;dt. The overwhelming majority of the accepted participants are those who have previously been seen in the casino scam shilling. But there are also those who have a clean trust. I wonder if the community will give these users a note in the trust that they advertise the 1xbit scam, as was done with the Yobit campaign? And if so, what kind of tag will it be?
Hey Ratimov, thanks for the list. Looks like some of them are not wearing or removed the signatures, and I am also seeing new applicants who are already wearing 1xbit signatures. I will observe the accounts over the weekend.

I am going to tag and flag any account that wears 1xbit signature and actively posts (whether it already has red trust or not). The point is they are willing to advertise scam and this should not be accepted. Let them first pay up the people they have scammed.

I don't care how much they are putting in the campaign. It's blood money.... scammed money!
member
Activity: 868
Merit: 63
I wonder if 1xbit knows that 5 of the members they have accepted have been bought and most likely are controlled by a single person. and looking at the campaign thread again, more of the accounts adkinsbet bought are trying to join the campaign.
People should post in their signature campaign thread that they are a scam and that anyone who will join their campaign will probably never receive a payment for their efforts. I think they know that we know those accounts are controlled by them and that they are just ignoring it hoping that they can catch some victims out of it.
copper member
Activity: 1204
Merit: 737
✅ Need Campaign Manager? TG > @TalkStar675
_____________________________________________________
wildan88Adkinsbet scam shiller Trust: +0 / =2 / -6
sempakAdkinsbet scam shillerTrust: +0 / =1 / -4
BlackFor3stAdkinsbet scam shillerTrust: +0 / =0 / -5
ErdoganScammerTrust: +0 / =0 / -5
gadadoAdkinsbet scam shillerTrust: +0 / =1 / -3
yayayoAdkinsbet scam shillerTrust: +0 / =0 / -2
NaficopaMalubit scam shillerTrust: +0 / =2 / -1
Pealr12Bounty cheaterTrust: +0 / =0 / -1
TumanggorBounty cheaterTrust: +0 / =0 / -1
jinxingTrust: +0 / =0 / -0
Alisha-kTrust: +0 / =0 / -0
proTECH77Trust: +0 / =0 / -0
EbedeTrust: +0 / =0 / -0
targetTrust: +0 / =0 / -0
Oh yeah,,,List of accepted participants and their previous work history is not so amazing.

No doubt that their platform is popular among most of these red trusted scammers and they have chosen their side. Its looking so funny to see all these accepted participants and  am thinking what will they do after getting scammed by 1xbit. Actually we can't change people mind and its pretty much common that scammers will join anything without proper justification.

Scam casino + campaign cheaters = perfect  Grin
You got it exactly.
legendary
Activity: 2492
Merit: 1145
Enterapp Pre-Sale Live - bit.ly/3UrMCWI
Also, we have no connections with 1xBet, it is seen via Curacao license: web archive
Does 1xbit have any betting licenses at all, because I can't find any information on your website?

I registered on your website to test it and I talked with your terrible customer support who can't answer simple questions I asked them, so I wonder are they just stupid or you teach them to ignore some questions?

Another problem is that you hired and accepted all members with negative trust who promoted adkinsbet scam, and they are all controlled by one guy, or maybe you are part of the same crew as adkinsbet.
Their customer support is very bad since then, Too many complaints and some tickets were not resolved that leaves gamblers hanging. They declared that they have their Curacao license though I'm not sure myself if it is legit. 

I think they are desperate for campaign members to join so they accepted anyone regardless of their status and risk if it is multiple accounts.

Scam casino + campaign cheaters = perfect  Grin
hero member
Activity: 2660
Merit: 651
Want top-notch marketing for your project, Hire me
Or they'll just "cancel" the campaign after the application thread is flooded with scam warning posts. They get a few days of free promotion and can blame the "trolls".
We are not going to leave people without payment, just like we do with the complaints received - all of them refunded or spent by users: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.56150537

Also, we have no connections with 1xBet, it is seen via Curacao license: web archive

Sincerely,
1xBit team
Every gamblers know you guys and 1xbet share almost all the same features, UI, template etc back in the year 2018 or 2019 if I could remember correctly and it totally unusual for any site to do that if they belong to the same parent.
If you really don't want to leave people without payment, open a new thread saying you guys want to clear every accusation so the public can see it or update the old thread you created and also watch how you guys operate for a year or more before we can sure you're serious about this.


-snip
I wonder if 1xbit knows that 5 of the members they have accepted have been bought and most likely are controlled by a single person. and looking at the campaign thread again, more of the accounts adkinsbet bought are trying to join the campaign.
You are right but this is not our problem and I am sure the person in charge of the1xbit campaign and their teams fully aware no genuine user of this forum will join their campaign without settling the old issues but I am still surprised by the 1xbit habit though and how they always come back with another strategy.
legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 7064
Also, we have no connections with 1xBet, it is seen via Curacao license: web archive
Does 1xbit have any betting licenses at all, because I can't find any information on your website?

I registered on your website to test it and I talked with your terrible customer support who can't answer simple questions I asked them, so I wonder are they just stupid or you teach them to ignore some questions?

Another problem is that you hired and accepted all members with negative trust who promoted adkinsbet scam, and they are all controlled by one guy, or maybe you are part of the same crew as adkinsbet.
legendary
Activity: 2520
Merit: 1113
-snip
I wonder if 1xbit knows that 5 of the members they have accepted have been bought and most likely are controlled by a single person. and looking at the campaign thread again, more of the accounts adkinsbet bought are trying to join the campaign.
copper member
Activity: 744
Merit: 23
Or they'll just "cancel" the campaign after the application thread is flooded with scam warning posts. They get a few days of free promotion and can blame the "trolls".
We are not going to leave people without payment, just like we do with the complaints received - all of them refunded or spent by users: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.56150537

Also, we have no connections with 1xBet, it is seen via Curacao license: web archive

Sincerely,
1xBit team
legendary
Activity: 3500
Merit: 6320
Crypto Swap Exchange
accept:
Btctalk name: target
Btctalk name: mr_ROBOTT
Btctalk name: jinxing
Btctalk name: proTECH77
Btctalk name: Tumanggor
Btctalk name: Erdogan
Bitcointalk Username: Ebede
Bitcointalk Username: Alisha-k
Btctalk name: yayayo
Btctalk name: wildan88
Btctalk name: gadado
Btctalk name: BlackFor3st
Btctalk name: Naficopa
Btctalk name: sempak
Btctalk name: Pealr12

//////////////////////////////////

spreadsheet coming


Btctalk name: target     Trust: +0 / =0 / -0
Btctalk name: jinxing     Trust: +0 / =0 / -0
Btctalk name: proTECH77     Trust: +0 / =0 / -0
Btctalk name: Tumanggor      Trust: +0 / =0 / -1
Btctalk name: Erdogan           Trust: +0 / =0 / -6
Bitcointalk Username: Ebede    Trust: +0 / =0 / -0
Bitcointalk Username: Alisha-k   Trust: +0 / =0 / -0
Btctalk name: yayayo     Trust: +0 / =1 / -1
Btctalk name: wildan88      Trust: +0 / =2 / -6
Btctalk name: gadado     Trust: +0 / =1 / -3
Btctalk name: BlackFor3st    Trust: +0 / =0 / -6
Btctalk name: Naficopa      Trust: +0 / =2 / -2
Btctalk name: sempak     Trust: +0 / =1 / -4
Btctalk name: Pealr12   Trust: +0 / =0 / -1

So a total of -30 trust and no positive.
*This is using myy trust list no idea what default looks like.
Sorry about the crappy formatting, I am mobile and remoting into my desktop machine.

Going to be interesting to say the least.

If they were at least trying to look legitimate IMO they would be using more of the zero trust people.
-Dave
copper member
Activity: 1204
Merit: 737
✅ Need Campaign Manager? TG > @TalkStar675
I have created a thread about the 1xbit signature campaign when they launched it last year. Here is it, Eventually, 1xbit has launched its new Signature campaign. (Update: 26-05-2021). Last time they ran banner ads on the forum once they failed to run signature campaign. I was surprised once see their banner ads. But later the ads down by admin, here was the response from admin.
Yeah we all know that they are trying to run their campaign in forum at any cost but not getting the scope due to their undeniable past record. Every time they are using new plan to run signature campaign and its the only option left on their hand. Admin took the right decision by donating their funds to charity and they know well that chance of using this forum banner space is no more.

Just take a look on their recent signature announcement. No doubt that they are giving greedy offer to get some participants and already they got a good number of application. They are using every single options but forum DT members are playing key role by revealing their activity every time. 

I am not sure if we can prevent this campaign, but personally I don't like to see advertise in the forum.
I don't think theymos will give them another chance to run their banner ad again in forum but we will have to keep our eyes open for their signature participants.
copper member
Activity: 2338
Merit: 4543
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
Or, we all sign up and when they don't pay us we can all put a flag on all their accounts.
I know theymos thinks he is doing the correct thing in not moderating scams or nuking large parts of the forum that are a breeding ground for scammers, but sooner or later IMO having all this stuff festering here is going to hurt crypto.

-Dave

In my humble opinion, this forum doesn't have a lot of effect on the world of crypto anymore.  Crypto is bigger.  And it's still full of scams.  Nothing going on here will hurt crypto nearly as much as a pump-and-dump celebrity influencer.  

I'm not trying to speak for theymos, but I'm not sure he thinks he's "doing the correct thing," but rather allowing the community to choose what's right or wrong.  Having a hands-off approach doesn't mean he's impartial.  Quite recently he stepped in to take remedial action against scams.  But these are different situations, and can't really be compared.
legendary
Activity: 3500
Merit: 6320
Crypto Swap Exchange
Probably never going to happen, but would be an interesting supply & demand experiment.

Or they'll just "cancel" the campaign after the application thread is flooded with scam warning posts. They get a few days of free promotion and can blame the "trolls".

Or, we all sign up and when they don't pay us we can all put a flag on all their accounts.
I know theymos thinks he is doing the correct thing in not moderating scams or nuking large parts of the forum that are a breeding ground for scammers, but sooner or later IMO having all this stuff festering here is going to hurt crypto.

-Dave

legendary
Activity: 2394
Merit: 1049
Smart is not enough, there must be skills
I said in the thread of 1xbit's signature campaign that they should work more on the complaints than the signature campaign. But I did not get the expected answer from them.
I think they will not answer that because what they want is the mercy of a high paying signature campaign, of course many will correct them and say they are wrong because they are more concerned with the signature campaign than the many complaints that occur which continue to enter complaints in the Trustpilot in show by YOSHIE.
So it is useless to advertise their site for the campaign while the problem is not guaranteed until now so 1xbit has indeed had many accusations until now.

What I'm worried about is when people in this forum are interested in this site and they will get stuck there, prevention must be taken so that no one applies to the campaign.
hero member
Activity: 1876
Merit: 721
Top Crypto Casino
looks like there are people thought it's worth getting a negative tag for advertising a scam gambling site for $30-$140. also, I noticed that the shill army of adkinsbet is at it trying to join the campaign. I wouldn't be surprised if 1xbet decided to accept them.

Most of the accounts that have applied in the signature campaign are tagged accounts. You can't expect anything good from those users, they were already involved in a lot of bad things that got them tagged. So they can do everything for money.

I said in the thread of 1xbit's signature campaign that they should work more on the complaints than the signature campaign. But I did not get the expected answer from them.
legendary
Activity: 2408
Merit: 2226
Signature space for rent
Or they'll just "cancel" the campaign after the application thread is flooded with scam warning posts. They get a few days of free promotion and can blame the "trolls".
Sorry I'm curious, if everyone here already knows that 1xbit.com is a site with a bad reputation then why didn't anyone report that campaign thread to the moderator for action? I saw the thread was still open.

Please read forum rules,

19. Possible (or real) scams and Trust ratings are not moderated (to prevent moderation abuse).
This means reporting to the moderator wouldn't help to remove the campaign thread. As you see in the rules, the forum doesn't moderate possible or real scams.

Yea, the thread will exist open if OP is not locked by himself or not move to the archive unless he broke forum rules. Moderator only takes action upon breaking forum rules Hope you understand what I said.
legendary
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1228
Playgram - The Telegram Casino
Or they'll just "cancel" the campaign after the application thread is flooded with scam warning posts. They get a few days of free promotion and can blame the "trolls".
Sorry I'm curious, if everyone here already knows that 1xbit.com is a site with a bad reputation then why didn't anyone report that campaign thread to the moderator for action? I saw the thread was still open.
legendary
Activity: 2520
Merit: 1113
looks like there are people thought it's worth getting a negative tag for advertising a scam gambling site for $30-$140. also, I noticed that the shill army of adkinsbet is at it trying to join the campaign. I wouldn't be surprised if 1xbet decided to accept them.
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
Probably never going to happen, but would be an interesting supply & demand experiment.

Or they'll just "cancel" the campaign after the application thread is flooded with scam warning posts. They get a few days of free promotion and can blame the "trolls".
legendary
Activity: 3500
Merit: 6320
Crypto Swap Exchange
They seem to have a tradition now. try to launch your campaign about once a year. This time, they made a bid on post pay, raising it to a record $9 per post. Only what in this sense, at least $20 per post, but who will probably advertise this scam garbage. The 1xbit owner needs to resolve past reputation issues with scam accusations, but they don't think about it at all.

If they are stubborn to the end and will accept someone in their campaign, these participants will most likely be negatively marked in the trust.

Makes you wonder how other places will respond. Not to put too fine a point on it, if they actually do pay the $9 / post will the legitimate places feel any pressure to raise their rates.

Look at all the crap that the best change campaign got when they 1st opened, but over a year later they are still paying and going strong.

We all know 1x is crap, but if this week they get 19 bad alt accounts with their sig and 1 good one and they actually pay, then a few weeks later they have 18 bad alts and 2 good ones, etc.

Yeah, it requires that they pay but assuming that they have 20 legendary accounts only @ $140 a week that is still under $3000 a week. If they are really as big as they look and are not paying some players then it's pocket change.

All of a sudden, someone who is considered a "good bitcointalk user" needs some more money and figures screw it and sings up.

Probably never going to happen, but would be an interesting supply & demand experiment.

-Dave
legendary
Activity: 3234
Merit: 5637
Blackjack.fun-Free Raffle-Join&Win $50🎲
I am not sure if we can prevent this campaign, but personally I don't like to see advertise in the forum.

If nothing has changed since the last time the admin wrote that post, then his attitude towards advertising a service that has such reputation will be identical - meaning it will ban their signature, similar to what happened with YoBit in the past. One of you just needs to send a PM to theymos and link to this thread - he only has the ability to disable their advertising.



I'm not a fan of tagging accounts for wearing a signature, but I am hoping this will cause some to think about whether they want to support this outfit. 

129 users who were wearing a yobit signature and had at least 1 good report against them in the last 14 days are banned for 14 days. All yobit signatures are wiped. Signatures containing "yobit.net" are banned for 60 days.

Some people were talking about neg-trusting spammers for spamming. This is not appropriate; report the posts, and if that doesn't seem to be working well, come to Meta with specific examples and suggestions.
legendary
Activity: 2128
Merit: 1775
Really ironic bad behavior done by: team / management (1xBet) towards its users, not only on the Bitcointalk, they also launched their actions outside the forum, recently there have been accusations against them (1xBet).

Accusation:
19 minutes ago.

https://www.trustpilot.com/users/60ad34b74d27a40019562859



Accusation:
3 hours ago.

https://www.trustpilot.com/reviews/60adde38f9f4870b700e7c40



The accusations from year to year were never resolved until there was a freeze and closed access to the 1xBet site.

Tottenham Hotspur Cut Ties With 1xBet, Liverpool & Chelsea Also Receive Gambling Commission Warning

1XBET Does not work

Now they are at their wits' end to launch their new action and look for new victims.

Be careful playing on the 1xBet gambling site, if you insist on the risk of your money being lost.

It seems: they don't care about their reputation anymore, they are like spikopats looking for prey that can be used as a sacrifice for their greed.
legendary
Activity: 1568
Merit: 6660
bitcoincleanup.com / bitmixlist.org
They seem to have a tradition now. try to launch your campaign about once a year. This time, they made a bid on post pay, raising it to a record $9 per post. Only what in this sense, at least $20 per post, but who will probably advertise this scam garbage. The 1xbit owner needs to resolve past reputation issues with scam accusations, but they don't think about it at all.

If they are stubborn to the end and will accept someone in their campaign, these participants will most likely be negatively marked in the trust.

I mean, it's 1xbet's poster child, so what else do you expect?

Just look how bad the parent company's reputation is: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1xBet

And those creators are on wanted lists everywhere so I guess it's only a matter of time before these 1xbit guys go on the run too, being legally related to 1xbet.
legendary
Activity: 2408
Merit: 2226
Signature space for rent
I have created a thread about the 1xbit signature campaign when they launched it last year. Here is it, Eventually, 1xbit has launched its new Signature campaign. (Update: 26-05-2021). Last time they ran banner ads on the forum once they failed to run signature campaign. I was surprised once see their banner ads. But later the ads down by admin, here was the response from admin.


https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.55079759
 
Quote
Removed. A service with this reputation should not have been allowed to advertise, but because the bidder was fairly established and had no negative trust, I didn't do enough research, and I missed the scam accusations and the other account. Apologies.

It's best to PM me high-priority things like this, since I notice PMs more quickly than Meta posts with vague titles.

I will donate the 0.08 BTC from this to some charity or charity-like-thing which accepts BTC. Any suggestions for a particular charity? (If there's no consensus in about a week, then I'm just going to donate it to The Water Project.)

Update: 0.0679971 BTC donated to Royse777's Project Covid-19, and 0.0120029 BTC donated to The Water Project  

I am not sure if we can prevent this campaign, but personally I don't like to see advertise in the forum.
copper member
Activity: 2338
Merit: 4543
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
1xbit is at it again.  They showed up today with a new account and started a signature campaign, and of course, they have many applicants already.  Then they  started a bounty for reviews, in a self-moderated thread, lol.

I'm not a fan of tagging accounts for wearing a signature, but I am hoping this will cause some to think about whether they want to support this outfit.  

Here's a list of the 1xbit accounts, read the

Accounts:

Here's the thread 1xbit started to "fix" their reputation: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.54938685
Jump to: