I'm trying decipher this.
In the end, those currencies that fail to adapt to upcoming regulation will be shuttered while those that remain may see the market as it now stands disappear.
Which I take means that if the only reason the currency was gaining traction was because it could be used anonymously, once KYC is required for businesses that accept it those merchants will no longer have the customers.
Fair argument. There's no doubt government could make the hassle of using bitcoin greater than its value to a merchant or to consumers.
In its place will be an opportunity to supplant conventional means of payment by offering convenience unlike anything currently offered by established financial players.
I'm drawing a blank here. If bitcoin can make it what offers "convenience unlike anything currently offered" wouldn't be hampered by the same KYC or other restrictions that impact Bitcoin?