Author

Topic: 2013-07-08 Announcing Jon Matonis as Executive Director of Bitcoin Foundation (Read 2459 times)

legendary
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1000
Don't directors usually elect the executive director? And the directors are elected by the membership?

Code:
(b) Vacancies of a Founding Director resulting from resignation of the director or removal of the director shall be filled by election of a majority of the Founding Members.

This is bitcoin foundation, they should be open about it, and allow members to vote on it. But they are flexing their egos and power trips to show everyone that they ultimately control the foundation.



If we want to get legal about it (while the BOD page is not up to date),

Peter Vessenes would have to resign or be removed from the board entirely to trigger an election. In his blog, he doesn't appear to have said so: https://bitcoinfoundation.org/blog/?p=214

If PV's still a member of the board of directors, then he did not leave a vacancy on the board. There was simply a title shift, him to non-exec board of directors member, Matonis to exec director. Additionally, the exec director position is typically paid in any organization; as PV referred to it as "this hire", I believe this is the case. The membership at large does not typically control hiring, only via ousting board members who make the hiring decisions.

That's how I saw it ... I suppose the Secretary position is now open, maybe gweedo wants to get elected for that?

I don't want to be elected to any thing.
legendary
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1000
Don't directors usually elect the executive director? And the directors are elected by the membership?

Code:
(b) Vacancies of a Founding Director resulting from resignation of the director or removal of the director shall be filled by election of a majority of the Founding Members.

This is bitcoin foundation, they should be open about it, and allow members to vote on it. But they are flexing their egos and power trips to show everyone that they ultimately control the foundation.

legendary
Activity: 3920
Merit: 2349
Eadem mutata resurgo
Quote
I don't want to be elected to any thing.

I think you're safe with that one.
donator
Activity: 980
Merit: 1004
felonious vagrancy, personified
The Foundation has never claimed to represent all of Bitcoin nor all of its users because that would be impossible for any organization.

Wow, it is great to hear that.  Until now the bitcoin foundation was implying otherwise, which won them more enemies than friends (or, in my case, won them the passive contempt of a bystander).  Either way, I'm glad to see Matonis out in front on this; he's the closest thing we have to a Linus figure right now.


Please join us.

I'd have bought a few lifetime memberships if it were called the "bitcoin-qt client development foundation".


the overwhelming out-pour of support for Matonis' appointment should be clear and resounding evidence to the likes of Luke Jr, Jeff Garzik, and Greg Maxwell that what they did to Jon in regards to the Bitcoin.org Press Center was absolutely against community wishes.

Yeah, that whole episode was pretty disgusting.  I lost a lot of respect for a lot of people after reading the github thread.
sr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
This bull will try to shake you off. Hold tight!
Great news indeed! This is the first time I feel positive about the Bitcoin Foundation.
legendary
Activity: 3920
Merit: 2349
Eadem mutata resurgo
Don't directors usually elect the executive director? And the directors are elected by the membership?

Code:
(b) Vacancies of a Founding Director resulting from resignation of the director or removal of the director shall be filled by election of a majority of the Founding Members.

This is bitcoin foundation, they should be open about it, and allow members to vote on it. But they are flexing their egos and power trips to show everyone that they ultimately control the foundation.



If we want to get legal about it (while the BOD page is not up to date),

Peter Vessenes would have to resign or be removed from the board entirely to trigger an election. In his blog, he doesn't appear to have said so: https://bitcoinfoundation.org/blog/?p=214

If PV's still a member of the board of directors, then he did not leave a vacancy on the board. There was simply a title shift, him to non-exec board of directors member, Matonis to exec director. Additionally, the exec director position is typically paid in any organization; as PV referred to it as "this hire", I believe this is the case. The membership at large does not typically control hiring, only via ousting board members who make the hiring decisions.

That's how I saw it ... I suppose the Secretary position is now open, maybe gweedo wants to get elected for that?
legendary
Activity: 3038
Merit: 1032
RIP Mommy
Don't directors usually elect the executive director? And the directors are elected by the membership?

Code:
(b) Vacancies of a Founding Director resulting from resignation of the director or removal of the director shall be filled by election of a majority of the Founding Members.

This is bitcoin foundation, they should be open about it, and allow members to vote on it. But they are flexing their egos and power trips to show everyone that they ultimately control the foundation.



If we want to get legal about it (while the BOD page is not up to date),

Peter Vessenes would have to resign or be removed from the board entirely to trigger an election. In his blog, he doesn't appear to have said so: https://bitcoinfoundation.org/blog/?p=214

If PV's still a member of the board of directors, then he did not leave a vacancy on the board. There was simply a title shift, him to non-exec board of directors member, Matonis to exec director. Additionally, the exec director position is typically paid in any organization; as PV referred to it as "this hire", I believe this is the case. The membership at large does not typically control hiring, only via ousting board members who make the hiring decisions.
legendary
Activity: 3038
Merit: 1032
RIP Mommy
Don't directors usually elect the executive director? And the directors are elected by the membership?
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1002
the overwhelming out-pour of support for Matonis' appointment should be clear and resounding evidence to the likes of Luke Jr, Jeff Garzik, and Greg Maxwell that what they did to Jon in regards to the Bitcoin.org Press Center was absolutely against community wishes.

the question is, will they ever try such a stunt again?
legendary
Activity: 3920
Merit: 2349
Eadem mutata resurgo
Quote
Yet they don't talk about why they skipped the voting process and gave him the job. If that is what you call perfect, then we are in trouble.

I was simply addressing Jon's words ... in our previous encounters you have come across as an ill-informed malcontent so any "trouble" you see is probably nothing to be too concerned with and absolutely do not see myself being any part of the "we" you've globbed onto us with ... i.e. you might be in trouble, leave me out of it.
donator
Activity: 213
Merit: 100
https://bitcoinfoundation.org/blog/?p=222

Quote
Why I Accepted Executive Director Position for Bitcoin Foundation
Jon Matonis   
Jul 09 2013 [...]

I will steadfastly oppose a crony capitalism direction for the Bitcoin Foundation. [...]

The bursting of Bitcoin technology on the scene at this time in history is not a mere coincidence. It is a reaction to three separate epochal developments largely emanating from the developed economies: (1) centralized and oppressive monetary authority (2) a dominant and complicit legacy banking system, and (3) the eradication of financial privacy.

Future generations will not be very forgiving if the Foundation fails in its mission to standardize and protect Bitcoin worldwide. The youth of today, including the youth of the legislative and ruling classes, certainly grasp this movement and the demographics clearly bear that out. Choice in currency is the free speech of commerce.

Just as those against file sharing and BitTorrent technology were on the wrong side of history, so too are the institutional forces opposed to unfettered bitcoin growth. The great challenge and mandate for our time is in encouraging them to see it that way. Please join us.

That's as clear and blunt a mission statement as could be wished for. Matonis truly is one of the good guys.
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 250
Hypercritical asshole that I've been about TBF, this is great news for the Bitcoin community.

If you see this post Jon, this old contrarian bastard wishes you all good things in your new position. Congratulations and mazel tov!

legendary
Activity: 1246
Merit: 1079
gweedo, I am just curious who you would rather see as the "face of bitcoin"

Disclaimer: I love Jon Matonis's writings. I believe he is the right man for the job.

However, if a vote is called for then a vote must be called. Even if most expect it to be unanimous. History has proven that democracy falls whenever elections are cancelled because of immense popularity. Benito Mussolini is a striking example. Even if it is merely a formality, it is an important formality.
legendary
Activity: 3920
Merit: 2349
Eadem mutata resurgo
https://bitcoinfoundation.org/blog/?p=222

Quote
Why I Accepted Executive Director Position for Bitcoin Foundation

Jon Matonis   
Jul 09 2013

I am proud to have been associated with the Bitcoin Foundation since its launch just nine short months ago. A nonprofit organization for Bitcoin can add greatly to the political and economic discourse for cryptographic money and monetary freedom. As Executive Director, I welcome the new challenge.

The Foundation has never claimed to represent all of Bitcoin nor all of its users because that would be impossible for any organization. Rather, the Foundation has consistently attempted to fill the gap where market-based incentives may not have produced the same outcome, such as in the areas of specialized grants and compensation transparency for volunteer developers as well as legal challenges to bitcoin usage and the sponsorship of aggressive legal defense.

For instance, we made our “cease and desist” correspondence with the State of California publicly available which can assist bitcoin exchanges and other bitcoin organizations in the future. Also, we intend to file amicus briefs in significant bitcoin-related legal cases and to offer pro bono legal defense where appropriate. In the next 30 days, we are scheduled to submit comments to FinCEN’s guidance and request for industry feedback on rulemaking. This will be made publicly available too.

The Foundation is not pro-regulation as some have claimed, but it is pro-education. I fully support across the board bitcoin education for legislative and regulatory entities. Proper education is not anti-market and I also agree with economist Peter Šurda who stated that lobbying on behalf of Bitcoin is not necessarily anti-market. However, constructing barriers to market entry and being complicit in certain crony capitalism regulatory outcomes is anti-market. I will steadfastly oppose a crony capitalism direction for the Bitcoin Foundation.

One of my primary near-term objectives for the Foundation is to become more inclusive of the various constituencies within the global bitcoin community. This will involve being more responsive to and communicative with member requests. It will also involve being more open to internationalization. Currently, 60% of the Foundation’s membership is non-US based and we need to do a better job behaving like a global organization. To this end, we will hold the next Bitcoin conference outside of the United States and we will sign on local Foundation chapters in several countries where interested parties have taken the lead on expanding the principles of Bitcoin in their region.

The bursting of Bitcoin technology on the scene at this time in history is not a mere coincidence. It is a reaction to three separate epochal developments largely emanating from the developed economies: (1) centralized and oppressive monetary authority (2) a dominant and complicit legacy banking system, and (3) the eradication of financial privacy.

Future generations will not be very forgiving if the Foundation fails in its mission to standardize and protect Bitcoin worldwide. The youth of today, including the youth of the legislative and ruling classes, certainly grasp this movement and the demographics clearly bear that out. Choice in currency is the free speech of commerce.

Just as those against file sharing and BitTorrent technology were on the wrong side of history, so too are the institutional forces opposed to unfettered bitcoin growth. The great challenge and mandate for our time is in encouraging them to see it that way. Please join us.

Perfect.
hero member
Activity: 588
Merit: 500
https://bitcoinfoundation.org/blog/?p=222

Quote
Why I Accepted Executive Director Position for Bitcoin Foundation

Jon Matonis   
Jul 09 2013

I am proud to have been associated with the Bitcoin Foundation since its launch just nine short months ago. A nonprofit organization for Bitcoin can add greatly to the political and economic discourse for cryptographic money and monetary freedom. As Executive Director, I welcome the new challenge.

The Foundation has never claimed to represent all of Bitcoin nor all of its users because that would be impossible for any organization. Rather, the Foundation has consistently attempted to fill the gap where market-based incentives may not have produced the same outcome, such as in the areas of specialized grants and compensation transparency for volunteer developers as well as legal challenges to bitcoin usage and the sponsorship of aggressive legal defense.

For instance, we made our “cease and desist” correspondence with the State of California publicly available which can assist bitcoin exchanges and other bitcoin organizations in the future. Also, we intend to file amicus briefs in significant bitcoin-related legal cases and to offer pro bono legal defense where appropriate. In the next 30 days, we are scheduled to submit comments to FinCEN’s guidance and request for industry feedback on rulemaking. This will be made publicly available too.

The Foundation is not pro-regulation as some have claimed, but it is pro-education. I fully support across the board bitcoin education for legislative and regulatory entities. Proper education is not anti-market and I also agree with economist Peter Šurda who stated that lobbying on behalf of Bitcoin is not necessarily anti-market. However, constructing barriers to market entry and being complicit in certain crony capitalism regulatory outcomes is anti-market. I will steadfastly oppose a crony capitalism direction for the Bitcoin Foundation.

One of my primary near-term objectives for the Foundation is to become more inclusive of the various constituencies within the global bitcoin community. This will involve being more responsive to and communicative with member requests. It will also involve being more open to internationalization. Currently, 60% of the Foundation’s membership is non-US based and we need to do a better job behaving like a global organization. To this end, we will hold the next Bitcoin conference outside of the United States and we will sign on local Foundation chapters in several countries where interested parties have taken the lead on expanding the principles of Bitcoin in their region.

The bursting of Bitcoin technology on the scene at this time in history is not a mere coincidence. It is a reaction to three separate epochal developments largely emanating from the developed economies: (1) centralized and oppressive monetary authority (2) a dominant and complicit legacy banking system, and (3) the eradication of financial privacy.

Future generations will not be very forgiving if the Foundation fails in its mission to standardize and protect Bitcoin worldwide. The youth of today, including the youth of the legislative and ruling classes, certainly grasp this movement and the demographics clearly bear that out. Choice in currency is the free speech of commerce.

Just as those against file sharing and BitTorrent technology were on the wrong side of history, so too are the institutional forces opposed to unfettered bitcoin growth. The great challenge and mandate for our time is in encouraging them to see it that way. Please join us.
sr. member
Activity: 358
Merit: 250
Excellent. I can't think of a better choice to take on the task of bitcoin advocacy.

Jon has done great work in raising bitcoin awareness and legitimacy within the mainstream business and investment communities and will no doubt continue to so at the helm of the Bitcoin Foundation.
legendary
Activity: 1708
Merit: 1020
full member
Activity: 364
Merit: 100
Anyone has a link to an article of him? I would enjoy to read.
legendary
Activity: 1002
Merit: 1000
Bitcoin
Matonis has shown vision. He is excellent for the job.

+1

Each time I saw that Jon wrote something about bitcoin I was exited to read it.

Matonis wrote the best articles I've read about bitcoin.  He know what he talk about, bring exact facts, visionary and also reasonable..  Passionate, savyy, very well articulated !   He's the man Smiley

+1

hero member
Activity: 588
Merit: 500
It gives me (and probably a lot of early adopters) a bit more confidence that the Foundation will be closer to the original Satoshi vision going forward, not as US-centric or regulation-loving as the direction in which Vessenes was trying to go.

Indeed. This is the best news in a long while, and bestows on the Bitcoin Foundation a good dose of much-needed legitimacy. Given the Foundation's direction during Vessenes's tenure, many folks had been becoming increasingly worried that the necessity of a fork (political or technical) was just a matter of time. Matonis taking over at the Foundation is a game-changer and should go a long way towards restoring optimism. A "coup" indeed Cool

Exactly.  Hopefully this acts to heal some of the divisions and trust and controversy in a community which already has plenty of external attacks and FUD to deal with.  I will give credit to Peter Vessenes for making a move which is wise on many levels.
hero member
Activity: 854
Merit: 1000
Bitcoin: The People's Bailout
Congratulations Jon!  This news and the BF's recent response to California's C&D letter are very encouraging!

...I think he likes bitcoins but kinda hurts our image, remember he is a radical. We really don't need those people in our corners, let alone be the face of bitcoin.

Actually, what we don't need are weak, timid souls that want to appease incompetent government bureaucrats and monopolistic bankers who are primarily interested in preserving the status quo.  Jon Matonis is a great choice and exactly the kind of person we need to have in our corner.

legendary
Activity: 3920
Merit: 2349
Eadem mutata resurgo
Good news. Go get 'em Jon Smiley


(NB: debating anything with gweedo is exercise in futility, the fact that he has problems with Jon matonis should tell you everything you need to know about him.)
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
♫ A wave came crashing like a fist to the jaw ♫
Anyone else but a radical. Ideal I would like to see a more of a business type take the helm. I really think the foundation was started way too young and is actually hurting the bitcoin theory of decentralization. I think once we had more decentralization, then we have a foundation to be a 3rd party to all them.

History isn't made by the meek and cowardly. It is written by those willing to take risks - including calling the current system on its bullshit and double-dealing. There's a new sheriff in town, and his name is Bitcoin. Currency bandits better clear out of town.

Reminds me of this:

Quote
Here's To The Crazy Ones. The misfits. The rebels. The trouble-makers. The round pegs in the
square holes. The ones who see things differently. They're not fond of rules, and they have
no respect for the status-quo. You can quote them, disagree with them, glorify, or vilify them.
About the only thing you can't do is ignore them. Because they change things. They push the
human race forward. And while some may see them as the crazy ones, we see genius.
Because the people who are crazy enough to think they can change the world - are the ones who do!

Congrats to Jon
donator
Activity: 213
Merit: 100
It gives me (and probably a lot of early adopters) a bit more confidence that the Foundation will be closer to the original Satoshi vision going forward, not as US-centric or regulation-loving as the direction in which Vessenes was trying to go.

Indeed. This is the best news in a long while, and bestows on the Bitcoin Foundation a good dose of much-needed legitimacy. Given the Foundation's direction during Vessenes's tenure, many folks had been becoming increasingly worried that the necessity of a fork (political or technical) was just a matter of time. Matonis taking over at the Foundation is a game-changer and should go a long way towards restoring optimism. A "coup" indeed Cool
legendary
Activity: 2408
Merit: 1121
Anyone else but a radical. Ideal I would like to see a more of a business type take the helm. I really think the foundation was started way too young and is actually hurting the bitcoin theory of decentralization. I think once we had more decentralization, then we have a foundation to be a 3rd party to all them.

History isn't made by the meek and cowardly. It is written by those willing to take risks - including calling the current system on its bullshit and double-dealing. There's a new sheriff in town, and his name is Bitcoin. Currency bandits better clear out of town.
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1002
hero member
Activity: 588
Merit: 500
Matonis has shown vision. He is excellent for the job.

The price rise of the past 12hs & end of the ongoing decline might be related to this switcheroo.  It gives me (and probably a lot of early adopters) a bit more confidence that the Foundation will be closer to the original Satoshi vision going forward, not as US-centric or regulation-loving as the direction in which Vessenes was trying to go.

legendary
Activity: 1031
Merit: 1000
Matonis has shown vision. He is excellent for the job.

And Satoshi himself sent Matonis an email inviting him to investigate Bitcoin which Matonis did and then began writing about it bringing tremendous amounts of attention and resulting in a significant amount of additional people joining the project.
legendary
Activity: 3122
Merit: 1538
yes
Matonis has shown vision. He is excellent for the job.
donator
Activity: 1736
Merit: 1014
Let's talk governance, lipstick, and pigs.
gweedo, I am just curious who you would rather see as the "face of bitcoin"
hero member
Activity: 715
Merit: 500
Voting to decide whether or not John Matonis should be the executive director of the bitcoin foundation would be a formality. That guy has done more to spread intelligible information about bitcoin than anyone else I can think of. But still, if the directive does indeed call for a vote, then the formality is important.
donator
Activity: 1736
Merit: 1014
Let's talk governance, lipstick, and pigs.
Excellent news. Jon is articulate, savvy, even tempered, and as nuts about Bitcoin as anyone can be.
legendary
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1000
https://bitcoinfoundation.org/blog/?p=214

Quote
I want to share some good news; we’re expanding.
As of today, Jon Matonis has accepted my offer to join us as Executive Director of the Bitcoin Foundation. He starts immediately, although he’ll take a few months to ramp up to full time.
This is a coup for the Foundation. I believe Jon’s work experience and passion for Bitcoin will combine into something awesome here. I’m excited!


I thought they were suppose to vote on those positions. I guess they forgot that part.
Jump to: