The whole "judge said it, therefore is true and significant" just reinforces the idea that state monopolies are the sole arbiters of what is true and what is significant. Kind of beginning to piss me off that people keep repeating this; who cares what one judge says or thinks? I knew it was money already without him/her to OK it for me.
The judge's decision has little to do with bitcoin's "truth" & everything to do with what what the US courts consider it to be. People faced with legal action tend to lose interest in philosophical abstracts like "truth," becoming interested, instead, in the grantedly arbitrary opinion of the judge.
That's who cares what judge thinks.
