Topic: [2016-09-21] Roger Ver on Bitcoin Scalability: Two Bitcoins Are Better Than One (Read 349 times)
September 21, 2016, 05:55:44 PM
I remember days where I was looking at Roger Ver as being a wise person with good arguments about how things can get better for Bitcoin. But nowadays I am more and more distancing myself from him and everything that he says. It's pure nonsense.
September 21, 2016, 05:07:13 PM
After months of heated debate over whether the Bitcoin network should scale or not, there seems to be no consensus in sight. The community is at a crossroads with two differing opinions on forking the network from 1MB to 20MB.
Yet, getting most of the validating nodes, miners and the rest of the bionetwork on board in an appropriate manner is a very significant issue. One camp thinks that the current network with its mere 7 transactions per second is debilitating and uncompetitive. However, the other camp believes that promoting a hard fork will revert transactions, which is the opposite of the basic principles of the Blockchain technology and its immutable ledger.
read the full interview here https://cointelegraph.com/news/roger-ver-on-bitcoin-scalability-two-bitcoins-are-better-than-one
Yet, getting most of the validating nodes, miners and the rest of the bionetwork on board in an appropriate manner is a very significant issue. One camp thinks that the current network with its mere 7 transactions per second is debilitating and uncompetitive. However, the other camp believes that promoting a hard fork will revert transactions, which is the opposite of the basic principles of the Blockchain technology and its immutable ledger.
read the full interview here https://cointelegraph.com/news/roger-ver-on-bitcoin-scalability-two-bitcoins-are-better-than-one
Jump to: