It's very clear from the article that the author is talking exclusively about price parity and how Bitcoin has achieved what no other currency throughout history has nor could. Your overt semantics over unit measurement are simply designed to muddy the water and downplay this achievement. For what agenda I know not. Every other reader of the article and respondee to this thread comprehends this.
What you're really saying is: "No-one is permitted to think about this in any way that differs from the way this article presents it"
Maybe if you were less interested in policing everyone's thoughts, and actually having a discussion, you and I could have done something constructive. For instance, you could have said: "1 BTC is determined by the denary number system, conferred by the number of fingers homo sapiens use to count with, therefore 1 BTC is also arbitrary". But you weren't really interested in exploring the boundaries of what makes any of this significant, bitchy comments and intellectual dogma apparently trump having a useful discussion. I'm noticing a few more heretics have since arrived, pointing out that the gold spot is not set in stone, or that the price has exceeded this level in the past. Have fun in your safe-space sandbox
