Uh, it is?
You do realise that Segwit2x activating is meaningless if users don't switch to the forked Bitcoin software that can use it?
Again, you do realise that a switch in development teams is by no means inevitable?
When you look at Garzik's track record, and the people he's often taken sides with (Mike Hearn, Gavin Andresen etc), he represents the class of people that wnat Bitcoin to be owned and run by the establishment financial system, centrally.
So you're presenting a picture that implies we can't do anything about something that's potentially very bad for Bitcoin: we hand control of the software development to people who want to turn it into PayPal 2.0, probably as slowly as possible to keep as many lemmings on board as possible.
It's simple: don't follow any of these hard forks, they're all demonstrably bad ideas, and all demonstrably dangerous to the stability both of the Bitcoin network and it's market price.
Why are you encouraging (false) belief in a voluntary change that seriously threatens Bitcoin, bbc.reporter? Bit irresponsible of you.