First time I heard Vitalik making some sense. LOL. Its not his usual self promotion of Ethereum. So an extent I believed that having a inexperienced company handle to much money to really put forward the projects their offered, may not be a good idea. That's why a lot of ICO never became successful or have scam its investors. So that's a clue for those who are willing to put their hard earn cash, check the team behind if they have the right tools to really bring the project to the next level. Younger people with less experience rise to positions of power. That combination will lead to the downfall of the company behind the ICO's.
Despite what you might think of the guy, he actually is a lot more sensible than most of the company he keeps... and good journalists/editors have a way of leading interviews into good reports, which is the treatment I believe the South Koreans gave here
While I can't wholeheartedly support the way Ethereum is managed, I suppose ongoing development is, after all, focused on mitigating the issues that Buterin can foresee with the network. All these apps jumping on, especially from states and corporations, it seems to unsettle him and the other developers he brought on board, in a good way that's forced them to rethink their direction over the years.
But he must be also thinking inwardly about how these centralized ICOs are a projection of projects like Ethereum. And no, I'm not the radical libertarian here to think everything must be decentralised.