Author

Topic: [2017-12-19] Bitcoin not a threat to financial stability, say European economist (Read 106 times)

sr. member
Activity: 1008
Merit: 355
Maybe these economist are currently correct. Bitcoin is not a threat to the traditional financial system that we have and hopefully even if Bitcoin can grow 10 times more it will actually be complimenting what we already have in the field...so there is no need to create a war between the two. This is just like the internet which give back the power to the people to determine which information they want and how they can access it...the role of the government is to make sure that the field is fair and not being used by people with evil intent. This message should be send to all government officials who fee threatened by Bitcoin and cryptocurrency in general as they might be barking on the wrong tree.
legendary
Activity: 2478
Merit: 1360
Don't let others control your BTC -> self custody
The link to the article is wrong. You have pointed to the bankrupt Korean exchange instead of the article that you have quoted.

It's interesting how opinions are divided. Some economists see it as a threat while others don't. I believe that after all it's just another form of money. If you use this or that to make purchases it really doesn't matter to a country and economy as long as it's possible to still charge taxes. Once BTC becomes regulated it will all be fine and our leaders will sleep well knowing their pockets are still being filled for doing nothing
newbie
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
The financial regulator has issued a stern warning against a speculative frenzy over initial coin offerings (ICOs) in cryptocurrencies such as bitcoin that have been promoted by celebrities including Paris Hilton.
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 16
Why should it be a threat? Although some "dreamers", if you will, among us believe that bitcoin will eventually overthrow the current economic system and replace fiat altogether, I just think of bitcoin as an alternative investment method which spices up the financial scene; which would not threaten financial stability, but rather make it more colorful.
hero member
Activity: 882
Merit: 506
I agree! But it has repercussions especially when the standing of banks are directly affected. Hence, governments worldwide should NEED to discuss and decide on these matters before everything concerning national economy goes out of hand. They really have to be proactive when it comes to this and cannot just let this off their chests. 
sr. member
Activity: 546
Merit: 252
Survey of 50 academics reveals majority are not worried about risks posed to mainstream markets

Bitcoin poses no threat to financial stability and is unlikely to rattle mainstream markets in the next couple of years, a group of leading European economists have said.

According to a survey of almost 50 academics from universities across Europe by the Centre for Macroeconomics and the Centre for Economic Policy Research, the majority are sanguine about the risks posed by the digital currency despite repeated warnings by senior financiers.

Bitcoin’s small size and detachment from the wider financial system was one of the key reasons for comfort among the economists, who said major investment groups did not hold significant amounts of the digital currency. While bitcoin has surged in value by more than 900% this year, its total value stands at about $300bn, paling in comparison to the total value of global shares at almost $80tn.

Senior financiers including the chief executives of JP Morgan and Goldman Sachs have warned against bitcoin in recent months, while the chairman of the Royal Bank of Scotland likened it to Dante’s Inferno, saying it was a speculative bubble in need of an apocalyptic health warning for investors from central banks.

There have been fears over the ability for banks to cover losses on bitcoin trading, with a group of major investment banks writing a letter to US regulators to say that the system of regulation was ill-prepared.

The cryptocurrency has become increasingly part of the wider financial system, after making its debut on the world’s largest futures exchange on Sunday evening, when the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME) became the second exchange to offer bitcoin derivatives trading.

The January 2018 contract traded on the CME initially spiked above $20,000 but later dropped, having been originally priced at $19,500.

A note of caution was sounded by Wouter den Haan of the London School of Economics, who responded to the survey by saying that past crises showed it could “take just one key financial institution taking on large risky positions to put the system at risk”.

Although the majority of economists believed there were limited risks to financial stability, they also said governments should introduce greater controls for cryptocurrencies as their anonymity and opacity could help enable tax evasion and other criminal activities.

Nicholas Oulton of the London School of Economics said: “One strand of current policy is to crack down on money laundering and tax evasion through tax havens. So it would seem odd to let cryptocurrencies get around these restrictions.”

The findings come after a South Korean cryptocurrency exchange appears set to file for bankruptcy after it was hacked for the second time this year, highlighting concerns about security amid booming trade in bitcoin and other virtual currencies.

The exchange, called Youbit, had been hacked once before in April when nearly 4,000 bitcoins were stolen in a cyber-attack that the country’s spy agency linked to North Korea, according to a recent South Korean newspaper report.

Youbit announced on its website on Tuesday that it had been hacked at 4.35am local time, causing a loss worth 17% of its total assets.

It did not elaborate on the amount, but said all customers’ cryptocurrency assets would be marked down to 75% of their value. It added that it had stopped trading and would work to minimise customer losses.

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/dec/19/korean-cryptocurrency-exchange-close-second-hacking-youbit
Jump to: