Many journalists apparently believe that sending bitcoins to an address is the same as buying them. In fact all of the articles written about this are based solely on a single tweet by someone with the same misconception.
Sorry, might be naive to ask this, but could you explain me how, as a journalist, you can “verify” this?
I mean, that this was just a transfer of bitcoins from one wallet to another, rather then a purchase from fiat to bitcoin. I’d love to know how to check these things, so to have much more clarity.
The Bitcoin block chain records only transfers. To verify that there was a transfer, one only has to look at the block chain. The block chain does not record any information about purchases, other than recording a transfer when there is one.
Verifying that it was a purchase of some sort, a journalist would need to:
1. Ask the source to show that it is a purchase, or
2. Find out who controls the address and ask them.
In this case, the original tweets reported some transfers and claimed that it was a purchase without giving any supporting information or even claiming that they had any information. This implies to me that the originator is simply mistaken (or misleading). Then, so-called journalists repeated and embellished the story without doing even a minimum of verification.