Quote from: https://news.bitcoin.com/study-provides-an-interesting-look-at-changing-bitcoin-narratives/
In the absence of a recognized sole leader, Bitcoiners refer to founding documents and first forum posts to attempt to decipher what Satoshi truly wanted for the currency.
I don't know how Satoshi's "As a leader" presence affects the currency?
If Satoshi returns and makes changes, there is nothing the community should accept.
- The idea of creating a Bitcoin is decentralized, so the absence of a leader is a factor of strength.
- The source of the conflict is due to the high price because many people have entered/used bitcoin as a way to make more money than those who joined it in its early days.
Quote from: https://news.bitcoin.com/study-provides-an-interesting-look-at-changing-bitcoin-narratives/
Isolated and Incompatible Visions
Carter and Hasufly’s research breaks Bitcoin narratives down into seven sections which include:
Carter and Hasufly’s research breaks Bitcoin narratives down into seven sections which include:
As I mentioned, the multiplicity of the definition is due to the change of those interested in bitcointalk "online users."
Most newbie accounts want a currency that is easy to exchange & cheap fees even if they abandon decentralization, unlike old members such as Amir Taaki.
