It's whatever gets people to read these days. If, for example, they sift through the comments of their previous articles about crypto and see a noticeable deal of skepticism about it, their next article on the subject is more likely to pander to that demographic. They're no longer reporting the news, they're merely feeding back and reinforcing the ignorance of their readers.
Populism > Journalism.
It's shameful, but that's just how things are now. The stuff they write doesn't have to be accurate or true, it just has to resonate with the readership. So they just write any old shit and they can always print a retraction later if someone threatens legal action because of it. As absurd as it is, this is the new normal.
Populism > Journalism.
It's shameful, but that's just how things are now. The stuff they write doesn't have to be accurate or true, it just has to resonate with the readership. So they just write any old shit and they can always print a retraction later if someone threatens legal action because of it. As absurd as it is, this is the new normal.
This section is Independent 'voices' which means it's not the paper itself, but their own journos have never said one positive thing either. As it's presumably curated it'll still fit whatever narrative they're in the mood for pushing.
After all this time I find it strange there's still only a handful of well informed and rational voices making consistent appearances. In whatever form it eventually settles, crypto isn't going anywhere but deeper in everyday life.
