https://www.coindesk.com/the-latest-bitcoin-bug-was-so-bad-developers-kept-its-full-details-a-secret/
What I can't understand is that why do they keep saying "the bug could have been exploited to print unlimited bitcoin" while in fact, even if that happened all those "fake Bitcoins" would be destroyed and thus no harm would be done? What am I missing here?
don't think you are missing anything, the fake bitcoins would have never been accepted by the chain
coindol resorts to digging up some minor things that happened in 2016 and were fixed promptly and making a mountain out of a molehill
they sound bitcoin.comish in this article, maybe there was a "paid request" for the article to be published?