Tons of coins have faster and more scalable blockchains than Bitcoin, so presenting a new one is pretty boring. The question should be whether his network is as decentralized and secure as Bitcoin's network. If it's not, then what's the point? A centralized blockchain is just a payment processor like PayPal, and no matter how hard those middleman claim to be honest, it never ends well for the users.
Completely agree with this. More so because there already is a super fast centralized payment system, which is called XRP. It completes transactions in just seconds, so what's there to gain from this?
XRP is also centralized, and it can scale to become even faster. I'm not hyping up XRP, but just pointing out that you don't gain anything from having a faster alternative than Bitcoin.
Bitcoin only needs to be Bitcoin in order to be Bitcoin. Can anyone follow me? The tech is completely irrelevant in this case since there is nothing that can replicate what Bitcoin did and will be doing in the future.
Most people don't give a shizzle about using crypto as money, regardless of how fast the transactions are. The volatility is killing all the 'usefulness' for daily transactions. Crypto is bad money.