Remember that successful cryptography often comes out of intelligence agencies too. And that intelligence agencies have a very good incentive to fund a Bitcoin-like project: Satoshi levels of wealth.
Remember also that Putin's western focused television propaganda helped to popularise Bitcoin a great deal. Your interpretation would make alot more sense if Russian government propaganda had been villainising Bitcoin.
I agree though, that just because someone like GCHQ or the NSA could have created Bitcoin doesn't mean they did, only Satoshi knows the answer. It will be kind of irrelevant though, if Satoshi turned out to be some kind of bad actor, intending to use vast Bitcoin wealth as a domination end-game, there's nothing to stop the world from invalidating that wealth by starting again from block 1. Not such a great plan, in other words.
I know that Bitcoin is being promoted on Russia Today, but this doesn't mean that the Russian government endorses it. In fact, Russia is supporting pretty much anything in the West that can be destabilizing - most notable example is how they support both far left and far right movements. But domestically it's very different - for the past year or so we've been getting very mixed and mostly negative signals, that can be summarized as "Russia doesn't trust cryptocurrencies". This is why they are talking about CryptoRuble - they want a "cryptocurrency" that was made in Russia and is under total control of the government.
And as for Bitcoin, it's just like with cryptography - we believe that it wasn't backdoored because researches haven't found anything, so even if it was created by intelligence agencies, it doesn't really matter.
? How is this different from practically any other anti-bitcoin conspiracy theory though? She doesn't have any proof to back up her claims so why even bother taking this stuff seriously? 
