IMHO. It's actually a good policy if they want to let all of their people trade only with the exchange that's registered under their government.
No. It is up to the user to decide whether they want to trade in an exchange that is located within Uzbekistan, or a centralized exchange that is based outside (or to use a P2P platform). Anyway, it is good to see the Uzbek regime not going too hostile on the cryptocurrency trade, similar to the case with China. Also, the warning from the National Agency of Project Management sounds OK to me. Unlike the case with Bangladesh and some of the other countries, they are not threatening the cryptocurrency users with jail term and fines.
Yeah it is understandable that it's still up to the user to decide but it's the Uzbekistan's government that's also encouraging these businesses to be registered under them. Since most exchanges these days, the trusted ones are centralized, they will have no problem if they aim to target citizens there.
IMHO. It's actually a good policy if they want to let all of their people trade only with the exchange that's registered under their government.
Using "agreed" exchanges means that they paid the correct taxes and the government may receive KYC info from those for example. It doesn't necessarily mean they are unsafe.
But we are used with governments' warnings, don't we? Aren't so many governments and central banks telling that Bitcoin is risky and should not be bought/used?
That's true, they've been giving warnings and it's just a matter of the process from this country and as usual, their citizens, their rule.
They just want to have these exchanges register under their government so they have the advantage of taxing these possible exchanges that might start their office in their country.
But we actually don't know intention behind the warning, especially if we consider internet censorship on Uzbekistan.
I'm not aware of the policy there but there's always the gray area for this matter.