Developers with power to change the cryptocurrency’s software hold an unorthodox role
that's a weird way to put it.
their position can loose it's importance very very easily, it's not like being some chairman role in the financial system, i.e. it's meritocratic
, are elusive—and have been known to head off disaster for the coin[/b]
the elusive people.
WHO GRANTED YOU AN INTERVIEW?
these WSJ people are pure assholes for this game playing behavior.
what pos wrote this pos article? do we have a name?Does that make Bitcoin centralized in a way?*
*Sure anyone can make their own code
right, that's obvious
, but it requires a lot of knowledge
...yes....
and it must be in consensus.
....no
why would any devs need to follow any consensus? we've already had several breaks and changes in consensus, both in Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies. there is no mandate to follow anything or anyone.
people follow what makes sense to them, devs and users alike. there would be no forkcoins or altcoins if that were true, hence it's self-evidently false
