Author

Topic: [2023-07-05] Bloomberg: BlackRock Wants to Make It Cheaper to Trade Bitcoin... (Read 141 times)

legendary
Activity: 4018
Merit: 1299
I'd also add, not just easier and cheaper, but in theory safer. They'll be taking the risk of properly securing the bitcoin and having insurance if they screw up, presumably.  In some respects that's good because they should be following best practices in doing so, but they have to be sure they are really getting it perfect.

Good point, as it's a spot ETF not a futures ETF, it will require them to actually hold bitcoins. I believe they intend to use Coinbase as their custodian, so it's not like BlackRock would have to do any extra work themselves. Coinbase is already regulated and has been doing this for years, so all should work fine from the security side.
I've no idea whether such ETF would require BlackRock to purchase any extra insurance (as far as I know ETFs are not FDIC insured) but they surely have plenty of experience in managing/mitigating financial risks.

The problem with the futures ETF is that it really has essentially phantom bitcoins.  Like the gold futures ETF not having to hold physical gold.  It essentially is just a way to gamble on the direction of the price without having to "settle" them at the end which saps demand from "physical" bitcoin.

You get nearly none of the benefits of bitcoin, only the risk of a price drop.  Yes, you could get the benefit of a price increase, but that is all. 

Might as well gamble on the flip of a coin.
legendary
Activity: 2436
Merit: 1561
I'd also add, not just easier and cheaper, but in theory safer. They'll be taking the risk of properly securing the bitcoin and having insurance if they screw up, presumably.  In some respects that's good because they should be following best practices in doing so, but they have to be sure they are really getting it perfect.

Good point, as it's a spot ETF not a futures ETF, it will require them to actually hold bitcoins. I believe they intend to use Coinbase as their custodian, so it's not like BlackRock would have to do any extra work themselves. Coinbase is already regulated and has been doing this for years, so all should work fine from the security side.
I've no idea whether such ETF would require BlackRock to purchase any extra insurance (as far as I know ETFs are not FDIC insured) but they surely have plenty of experience in managing/mitigating financial risks.
legendary
Activity: 4018
Merit: 1299
BlackRock are also quite diversified with their investment, but it is heavily exposed to some large tech stocks. So it makes sense that they will invest in one of the best financial breakthroughs in the last 20 years.

Yes, Bitcoin investments are high risk, but if you have a diversified and balanced portfolio, then you can manage the risk. I think the SEC are stalling the decision to approve their application, because they want to see what happens in the next election.  Roll Eyes

In this case, is not as much about BlackRock investing in Bitcoin, but more about them making it easier for others (especially institutional investors) to invest in it. So they'd be making profits from managing the ETF rather than from Bitcoin appreciating in value. So pretty similar to centralised exchanges, it's the number of users and activity that matters, not the asset's price.

I'd also add, not just easier and cheaper, but in theory safer. They'll be taking the risk of properly securing the bitcoin and having insurance if they screw up, presumably.  In some respects that's good because they should be following best practices in doing so, but they have to be sure they are really getting it perfect.
legendary
Activity: 2436
Merit: 1561
BlackRock is one of the largest investment firms in the States and has their hands in EVERYTHING! If that kind of company could make trading cheaper and acquisition easier then they're big enough to bring in some very big investors (companies that spend massive amounts of money)..

BlackRock is not just "one of the largest", they're THE largest, and not only in the US, but in the world. Vanguard is the 2nd largest and is not very far behind.
Both are absolute giants and the amounts of assets they manage each exceed the GDP of the vast majority of the countries.

For that reason, many are concerned if it's indeed good news if they end up dominating Bitcoin market. But there's not much anyone can do about it anyway.
newbie
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
It's definitely good news when you see a company like BlackRock (or even say, Vanguard) wanting to make it cheaper/easier for people to get BTC. BlackRock is one of the largest investment firms in the States and has their hands in EVERYTHING! If that kind of company could make trading cheaper and acquisition easier then they're big enough to bring in some very big investors (companies that spend massive amounts of money)..
legendary
Activity: 2436
Merit: 1561
BlackRock are also quite diversified with their investment, but it is heavily exposed to some large tech stocks. So it makes sense that they will invest in one of the best financial breakthroughs in the last 20 years.

Yes, Bitcoin investments are high risk, but if you have a diversified and balanced portfolio, then you can manage the risk. I think the SEC are stalling the decision to approve their application, because they want to see what happens in the next election.  Roll Eyes

In this case, is not as much about BlackRock investing in Bitcoin, but more about them making it easier for others (especially institutional investors) to invest in it. So they'd be making profits from managing the ETF rather than from Bitcoin appreciating in value. So pretty similar to centralised exchanges, it's the number of users and activity that matters, not the asset's price.
legendary
Activity: 3430
Merit: 1957
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
BlackRock are also quite diversified with their investment, but it is heavily exposed to some large tech stocks. So it makes sense that they will invest in one of the best financial breakthroughs in the last 20 years.

Yes, Bitcoin investments are high risk, but if you have a diversified and balanced portfolio, then you can manage the risk. I think the SEC are stalling the decision to approve their application, because they want to see what happens in the next election.  Roll Eyes
legendary
Activity: 2436
Merit: 1561
Some bullish news, BlackRock's CEO, Larry Fink sees Bitcoin as a good opportunity and wants to "democratize crypto". After having their initial ETF application rejected (apparently for trivial reasons) they re-filed it recently.

BlackRock Wants to Make It Cheaper to Trade Bitcoin, Larry Fink Says

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-07-05/blackrock-wants-to-make-it-cheaper-to-trade-bitcoin-fink-says

Quote
BlackRock Inc. Chief Executive Officer Larry Fink called Bitcoin an “international asset” and said the money manager wants to use its heft to make it less expensive and easier to invest in the cryptocurrency.

“It costs a lot of money right now to transact Bitcoin,” Fink said Wednesday in an interview on Fox Business. “We hope our regulators look at these filings as a way to democratize crypto.”

The money management giant filed paperwork last month to set up an exchange-traded fund that invests directly in Bitcoin, which prompted a flurry of similar applications from rival issuers and a rally in Bitcoin’s price to more than $30,000. Bitcoin rose more than 12% in June alone and is up more than 80% year-to-date.
...

ps. they seemed to intend to subscribe-wall this article but I can read it fine, and hope you are too.
Jump to: