7970's in the mail.....anyone used with GUIminer yet?

jjiimm_64

legendary

Activity: 1876

Merit: 1000

Quote from: despoiler on January 22, 2012, 04:56:07 PM

Quote from: jjiimm_64 on January 22, 2012, 12:09:06 AM

Quote from: despoiler on January 20, 2012, 12:47:23 AM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: despoiler on January 19, 2012, 11:07:34 PM

Weird I use those settings an am 100 MH/s off your numbers.

I'm somewhat under ArtForz's numbers, too. At 1075 core, 685 mem, using phoenix with suggested params, only getting ~633Mh/s.

Art, what memclock are you using?

NM figured it out in part for my comp. He has the newest version of Phoenix. I just dropped it into Guiminer. GM is a little slow to display the MH/s with it in like that. I'm still like 60 MH/s off his numbers.

finally got them running.

before dropping in the new phoenix, the hashrate showed right away at about 455. once I drop the new phoenix into GM, it will NOT show the hashrate. unless your on the mining tab and stop the miner, it then shows it. how did you get yours to show?

It just takes a really long time to show up.

I changed to diablo and am getting very good results... and it seams to use less watts then gui/phen

snip from other thread

Quote

I am getting ~670Mh 1125/1020 pulling about 240w/c all defaults on diablo

edit: i since changed to 925/1100 to compare. getting: ~550 diablo defaults

edit2: wow, only pulling about 175w/c 2 cards: 479w total

mobo: crosshair V
psu: seasonic 650
cpu: phenomII x4 830
HD: western dig green power 500g
mem: Kingston 4g 1600

nothing underclocked on mobo, all defaults pulls about 120w idle

despoiler

member

Activity: 94

Merit: 10

Quote from: jjiimm_64 on January 22, 2012, 12:09:06 AM

Quote from: despoiler on January 20, 2012, 12:47:23 AM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: despoiler on January 19, 2012, 11:07:34 PM

Weird I use those settings an am 100 MH/s off your numbers.

I'm somewhat under ArtForz's numbers, too. At 1075 core, 685 mem, using phoenix with suggested params, only getting ~633Mh/s.

Art, what memclock are you using?

NM figured it out in part for my comp. He has the newest version of Phoenix. I just dropped it into Guiminer. GM is a little slow to display the MH/s with it in like that. I'm still like 60 MH/s off his numbers.

finally got them running.

before dropping in the new phoenix, the hashrate showed right away at about 455. once I drop the new phoenix into GM, it will NOT show the hashrate. unless your on the mining tab and stop the miner, it then shows it. how did you get yours to show?

It just takes a really long time to show up.

jjiimm_64

legendary

Activity: 1876

Merit: 1000

Quote from: despoiler on January 20, 2012, 12:47:23 AM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: despoiler on January 19, 2012, 11:07:34 PM

Weird I use those settings an am 100 MH/s off your numbers.

I'm somewhat under ArtForz's numbers, too. At 1075 core, 685 mem, using phoenix with suggested params, only getting ~633Mh/s.

Art, what memclock are you using?

NM figured it out in part for my comp. He has the newest version of Phoenix. I just dropped it into Guiminer. GM is a little slow to display the MH/s with it in like that. I'm still like 60 MH/s off his numbers.

finally got them running.

before dropping in the new phoenix, the hashrate showed right away at about 455. once I drop the new phoenix into GM, it will NOT show the hashrate. unless your on the mining tab and stop the miner, it then shows it. how did you get yours to show?

jjiimm_64

legendary

Activity: 1876

Merit: 1000

Quote from: yochdog on January 20, 2012, 08:57:39 PM

false alarm.....the clocks reset.....I am getting the same hash rate. no improvement.

at least you can keep yours running......

mine keeps hard stopping the machine.. I even tried diablo. ran all 4 cards for about 30 sec then poof

maybe the silverstone 1200 not enough to push 4 of these cards at stock clocks? I have a seasonic 1250 in a diff machine. maybe I will try that.

meanwhile, i put the 5 5870's back in the rig and they run fine on the silverstone1200. so i dont think it is the power.. dunno

yochdog

legendary

Activity: 2044

Merit: 1000

false alarm.....the clocks reset.....I am getting the same hash rate. no improvement.

despoiler

member

Activity: 94

Merit: 10

Quote from: yochdog on January 20, 2012, 08:16:16 PM

Quote from: despoiler on January 20, 2012, 03:23:47 PM

New drivers just hit. Anyone care to test? I'll be doing so after work.

http://support.amd.com/us/kbarticles/Pages/RC11Driver.aspx

SUCKS FOR MINING!!! DO NOT INSTALL IT!

I lost 200 MH/s with the same settings. Thanks for nothing AMD. what dogshit.

Just got home. These are giving me the same MH/s as I was getting before.

yochdog

legendary

Activity: 2044

Merit: 1000

Quote from: despoiler on January 20, 2012, 03:23:47 PM

New drivers just hit. Anyone care to test? I'll be doing so after work.

http://support.amd.com/us/kbarticles/Pages/RC11Driver.aspx

same hash rate

despoiler

member

Activity: 94

Merit: 10

New drivers just hit. Anyone care to test? I'll be doing so after work.

http://support.amd.com/us/kbarticles/Pages/RC11Driver.aspx

ArtForz

sr. member

Activity: 406

Merit: 257

Can't set anything lower, when I try it *shows* lower but jumps back to 1375 (obvious in power consumption @ 925 core)

despoiler

member

Activity: 94

Merit: 10

Quote from: jjiimm_64 on January 20, 2012, 01:47:40 PM

Quote from: ArtForz on January 20, 2012, 04:46:13 AM

*shame* disregard those results, somehow managed to completely botch it.

I think I mixed up hashrates, clocks and power measurements from different sets of runs or skipped lines somehwere.
Great, have to throw all data out and start over :/

Phenom II 1100T @ 4.0GHz, cpu freq scaling disabled.
idle, display off 122W
idle @ desktop 139W
phoenix 1.7.3, -k poclbm AGGRESSION=10 WORKSIZE=256
stock V @ 50% fan
925 core/1375 mem, 554 Mh/s, 369W
925 core/1020 mem, 554 Mh/s, 360W
1070 core/1020 mem, 640 Mh/s, 386W
1170 core/1020 mem, 698 Mh/s, 407W
1.20 V @ 55% fan
1170 core/1020 mem, 698 Mh/s, 421W
1200 core/1020 mem, 714 Mh/s, 428W
1240 core/1020 mem, 736 Mh/s, 431W
1.25V @ 70% fan
1240 core/1020 mem, 736 Mh/s, 467W
1270 core/1020 mem, 753 Mh/s, 476W
1.30V @ 80% fan
1270 core/1020 mem, 753 Mh/s, 509W
1350 core/1020 mem, 799 Mh/s, 525W

not sure how I got 695/759/804, guess that was a run at 1375 mem

Art, why are we keeping the mem so high? is it needed to achieve the hashrate? or is 1020 all you can lower it?

I'm running mine @ 1125/685 @ 1100mv @ 666 MH/s. I can go lower on the voltage too. I haven't found the floor yet with that overclock. I have no hardware errors at those settings. My understanding is somewhere between 1050-1100 is possible.

jjiimm_64

legendary

Activity: 1876

Merit: 1000

Quote from: ArtForz on January 20, 2012, 04:46:13 AM

*shame* disregard those results, somehow managed to completely botch it.

I think I mixed up hashrates, clocks and power measurements from different sets of runs or skipped lines somehwere.
Great, have to throw all data out and start over :/

Phenom II 1100T @ 4.0GHz, cpu freq scaling disabled.
idle, display off 122W
idle @ desktop 139W
phoenix 1.7.3, -k poclbm AGGRESSION=10 WORKSIZE=256
stock V @ 50% fan
925 core/1375 mem, 554 Mh/s, 369W
925 core/1020 mem, 554 Mh/s, 360W
1070 core/1020 mem, 640 Mh/s, 386W
1170 core/1020 mem, 698 Mh/s, 407W
1.20 V @ 55% fan
1170 core/1020 mem, 698 Mh/s, 421W
1200 core/1020 mem, 714 Mh/s, 428W
1240 core/1020 mem, 736 Mh/s, 431W
1.25V @ 70% fan
1240 core/1020 mem, 736 Mh/s, 467W
1270 core/1020 mem, 753 Mh/s, 476W
1.30V @ 80% fan
1270 core/1020 mem, 753 Mh/s, 509W
1350 core/1020 mem, 799 Mh/s, 525W

not sure how I got 695/759/804, guess that was a run at 1375 mem

Art, why are we keeping the mem so high? is it needed to achieve the hashrate? or is 1020 all you can lower it?

ArtForz

sr. member

Activity: 406

Merit: 257

Quote from: yochdog on January 20, 2012, 10:46:02 AM

So we should subtract 139W from the total power number to figure what the card is using?

I'd subtract 108W or so, should get decent estimate of real card power at the wall with a 92% efficient PSU.

yochdog

legendary

Activity: 2044

Merit: 1000

Quote from: ArtForz on January 20, 2012, 04:46:13 AM

*shame* disregard those results, somehow managed to completely botch it.

I think I mixed up hashrates, clocks and power measurements from different sets of runs or skipped lines somehwere.
Great, have to throw all data out and start over :/

Phenom II 1100T @ 4.0GHz, cpu freq scaling disabled.
idle, display off 122W
idle @ desktop 139W
phoenix 1.7.3, -k poclbm AGGRESSION=10 WORKSIZE=256
stock V @ 50% fan
925 core/1375 mem, 554 Mh/s, 369W
925 core/1020 mem, 554 Mh/s, 360W
1070 core/1020 mem, 640 Mh/s, 386W
1170 core/1020 mem, 698 Mh/s, 407W
1.20 V @ 55% fan
1170 core/1020 mem, 698 Mh/s, 421W
1200 core/1020 mem, 714 Mh/s, 428W
1240 core/1020 mem, 736 Mh/s, 431W
1.25V @ 70% fan
1240 core/1020 mem, 736 Mh/s, 467W
1270 core/1020 mem, 753 Mh/s, 476W
1.30V @ 80% fan
1270 core/1020 mem, 753 Mh/s, 509W
1350 core/1020 mem, 799 Mh/s, 525W

not sure how I got 695/759/804, guess that was a run at 1375 mem

So we should subtract 139W from the total power number to figure what the card is using?

despoiler

member

Activity: 94

Merit: 10

Quote from: ArtForz on January 20, 2012, 04:46:13 AM

*shame* disregard those results, somehow managed to completely botch it.

I think I mixed up hashrates, clocks and power measurements from different sets of runs or skipped lines somehwere.
Great, have to throw all data out and start over :/

Phenom II 1100T @ 4.0GHz, cpu freq scaling disabled.
idle, display off 122W
idle @ desktop 139W
phoenix 1.7.3, -k poclbm AGGRESSION=10 WORKSIZE=256
stock V @ 50% fan
925 core/1375 mem, 554 Mh/s, 369W
925 core/1020 mem, 554 Mh/s, 360W
1070 core/1020 mem, 640 Mh/s, 386W
1170 core/1020 mem, 698 Mh/s, 407W
1.20 V @ 55% fan
1170 core/1020 mem, 698 Mh/s, 421W
1200 core/1020 mem, 714 Mh/s, 428W
1240 core/1020 mem, 736 Mh/s, 431W
1.25V @ 70% fan
1240 core/1020 mem, 736 Mh/s, 467W
1270 core/1020 mem, 753 Mh/s, 476W
1.30V @ 80% fan
1270 core/1020 mem, 753 Mh/s, 509W
1350 core/1020 mem, 799 Mh/s, 525W

not sure how I got 695/759/804, guess that was a run at 1375 mem

Whew...thought I was going to have to do more troubleshooting. Although I wish your old numbers were true. /sadface

ArtForz

sr. member

Activity: 406

Merit: 257

*shame* disregard those results, somehow managed to completely botch it.

I think I mixed up hashrates, clocks and power measurements from different sets of runs or skipped lines somehwere.
Great, have to throw all data out and start over :/

Phenom II 1100T @ 4.0GHz, cpu freq scaling disabled.
idle, display off 122W
idle @ desktop 139W
phoenix 1.7.3, -k poclbm AGGRESSION=10 WORKSIZE=256
stock V @ 50% fan
925 core/1375 mem, 554 Mh/s, 369W
925 core/1020 mem, 554 Mh/s, 360W
1070 core/1020 mem, 640 Mh/s, 386W
1170 core/1020 mem, 698 Mh/s, 407W
1.20 V @ 55% fan
1170 core/1020 mem, 698 Mh/s, 421W
1200 core/1020 mem, 714 Mh/s, 428W
1240 core/1020 mem, 736 Mh/s, 431W
1.25V @ 70% fan
1240 core/1020 mem, 736 Mh/s, 467W
1270 core/1020 mem, 753 Mh/s, 476W
1.30V @ 80% fan
1270 core/1020 mem, 753 Mh/s, 509W
1350 core/1020 mem, 799 Mh/s, 525W

not sure how I got 695/759/804, guess that was a run at 1375 mem

jjiimm_64

legendary

Activity: 1876

Merit: 1000

Nice. I had to punt. throwing in some 5870's and a linuxcoin for the rig to work until I can get to this tomorrow night

as I took the cards out... I think one of the plugs was not fully seated. could explain the crashes.

will get these running manana

despoiler

member

Activity: 94

Merit: 10

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: despoiler on January 19, 2012, 11:07:34 PM

Weird I use those settings an am 100 MH/s off your numbers.

I'm somewhat under ArtForz's numbers, too. At 1075 core, 685 mem, using phoenix with suggested params, only getting ~633Mh/s.

Art, what memclock are you using?

NM figured it out in part for my comp. He has the newest version of Phoenix. I just dropped it into Guiminer. GM is a little slow to display the MH/s with it in like that. I'm still like 60 MH/s off his numbers.

despoiler

member

Activity: 94

Merit: 10

Quote from: ArtForz on January 19, 2012, 11:40:12 AM

Quote from: bulanula on January 19, 2012, 11:21:20 AM

Can't remember who it was but some dude got them at around 720 or 700 mhash/s !

But then the power consumed makes your MH/W ratio suck !

1-upd!
max @ stock V: 1070 core, 695Mh/s
@ 1.20V: 1170, 759Mh/s
and for shits and giggles...
@ 1.25V: 1240 core, 805Mh/s

Tip: try phoenix with -k poclbm AGGRESSION=10 WORKSIZE=256

Weird I use those settings I am 100 MH/s off your numbers.

jjiimm_64

legendary

Activity: 1876

Merit: 1000

Just got my 4 cards.... cant wait to get them home.

edit: this is alot like work.. drivers.... msiafterburner display wrapper issues... etc etc

got them working at stock clocks.. but only getting 360. then when I put in art setting, they went to 450 for a minute then hard crash on win7...

Gabi

legendary

Activity: 1148

Merit: 1008

If you want to walk on water, get out of the boat

O.o

Impressive

ArtForz

sr. member

Activity: 406

Merit: 257

Quote from: yochdog on January 19, 2012, 12:07:28 PM

Quote from: ArtForz on January 19, 2012, 11:40:12 AM

Quote from: bulanula on January 19, 2012, 11:21:20 AM

Can't remember who it was but some dude got them at around 720 or 700 mhash/s !

But then the power consumed makes your MH/W ratio suck !

1-upd!
max @ stock V: 1070 core, 695Mh/s
@ 1.20V: 1170, 759Mh/s
and for shits and giggles...
@ 1.25V: 1240 core, 805Mh/s

Tip: try phoenix with -k poclbm AGGRESSION=10 WORKSIZE=256

Any advice on better setting with Diablo?

Nope, haven't found any better settings than what other people have been saying for Diablo, best I found was ~2.2% worse than phoenix.

portron

member

Activity: 106

Merit: 10

Quote from: yochdog on January 19, 2012, 12:05:21 PM

Quote from: portron on January 19, 2012, 11:34:43 AM

Yup, confirmed it doesn't work with GUIMiner...

I'm getting 640 m/hash on 1075mhz... at 60c w/ fans at 70%, on stock voltage (diablominer).

I was running 1125 but it was just slightly unstable and I didn't feel like bumping up the voltage.

good god....at 70% they must be screaming like banshees. I can hardly stand them at 50%!

It's in a room with 12 other cards, so, meh?

yochdog

legendary

Activity: 2044

Merit: 1000

Quote from: ArtForz on January 19, 2012, 11:40:12 AM

Quote from: bulanula on January 19, 2012, 11:21:20 AM

Can't remember who it was but some dude got them at around 720 or 700 mhash/s !

But then the power consumed makes your MH/W ratio suck !

1-upd!
max @ stock V: 1070 core, 695Mh/s
@ 1.20V: 1170, 759Mh/s
and for shits and giggles...
@ 1.25V: 1240 core, 805Mh/s

Tip: try phoenix with -k poclbm AGGRESSION=10 WORKSIZE=256

Any advice on better setting with Diablo?

yochdog

legendary

Activity: 2044

Merit: 1000

Quote from: ArtForz on January 19, 2012, 11:40:12 AM

Quote from: bulanula on January 19, 2012, 11:21:20 AM

Can't remember who it was but some dude got them at around 720 or 700 mhash/s !

But then the power consumed makes your MH/W ratio suck !

1-upd!
max @ stock V: 1070 core, 695Mh/s
@ 1.20V: 1170, 759Mh/s
and for shits and giggles...
@ 1.25V: 1240 core, 805Mh/s

Tip: try phoenix with -k poclbm AGGRESSION=10 WORKSIZE=256

Holy. Shit.

ArtForz

sr. member

Activity: 406

Merit: 257

Quote from: bulanula on January 19, 2012, 11:54:51 AM

Quote from: ArtForz on January 19, 2012, 11:40:12 AM

Quote from: bulanula on January 19, 2012, 11:21:20 AM

Can't remember who it was but some dude got them at around 720 or 700 mhash/s !

But then the power consumed makes your MH/W ratio suck !

1-upd!
max @ stock V: 1070 core, 695Mh/s
@ 1.20V: 1170, 759Mh/s
and for shits and giggles...
@ 1.25V: 1240 core, 805Mh/s

Tip: try phoenix with -k poclbm AGGRESSION=10 WORKSIZE=256

So what is the consensus ?

Are CGN shaders more or less or the same in terms of mining compared to VLIW4 or VLIW5 shaders from 6970 and 5870 ?

Quick calc says we're already a few % higher hashrate/shader/clock than VLIWx.
I'd have to take a closer look at how GCN shader ASM looks and what engine performance is like, but wouldn't expect any miracles, maybe another 2-3% increase.
So my opinion so far "pretty much a wash, a hair better than 5xxx per shader per clock, may get another few % when more time is spent tuning kernels for GCN".
Mining is really unique in how it manages to get well > 90% peak throughput even on VLIW5 Wink

yochdog

legendary

Activity: 2044

Merit: 1000

Quote from: portron on January 19, 2012, 11:34:43 AM

Yup, confirmed it doesn't work with GUIMiner...

I'm getting 640 m/hash on 1075mhz... at 60c w/ fans at 70%, on stock voltage (diablominer).

I was running 1125 but it was just slightly unstable and I didn't feel like bumping up the voltage.

good god....at 70% they must be screaming like banshees. I can hardly stand them at 50%!

bulanula

hero member

Activity: 518

Merit: 500

Quote from: ArtForz on January 19, 2012, 11:40:12 AM

Quote from: bulanula on January 19, 2012, 11:21:20 AM

Can't remember who it was but some dude got them at around 720 or 700 mhash/s !

But then the power consumed makes your MH/W ratio suck !

1-upd!
max @ stock V: 1070 core, 695Mh/s
@ 1.20V: 1170, 759Mh/s
and for shits and giggles...
@ 1.25V: 1240 core, 805Mh/s

Tip: try phoenix with -k poclbm AGGRESSION=10 WORKSIZE=256

So what is the consensus ?

Are CGN shaders more or less or the same in terms of mining compared to VLIW4 or VLIW5 shaders from 6970 and 5870 ?

jjiimm_64

legendary

Activity: 1876

Merit: 1000

Quote from: ArtForz on January 19, 2012, 11:40:12 AM

Quote from: bulanula on January 19, 2012, 11:21:20 AM

Can't remember who it was but some dude got them at around 720 or 700 mhash/s !

But then the power consumed makes your MH/W ratio suck !

1-upd!
max @ stock V: 1070 core, 695Mh/s
@ 1.20V: 1170, 759Mh/s
and for shits and giggles...
@ 1.25V: 1240 core, 805Mh/s

Tip: try phoenix with -k poclbm AGGRESSION=10 WORKSIZE=256

art, thank you.. if I remember correctly, i used phoenix with guiminer back in the day Wink

rjk

sr. member

Activity: 448

Merit: 250

1ngldh

Quote from: ArtForz on January 19, 2012, 11:40:12 AM

Quote from: bulanula on January 19, 2012, 11:21:20 AM

Can't remember who it was but some dude got them at around 720 or 700 mhash/s !

But then the power consumed makes your MH/W ratio suck !

1-upd!
max @ stock V: 1070 core, 695Mh/s
@ 1.20V: 1170, 759Mh/s
and for shits and giggles...
@ 1.25V: 1240 core, 805Mh/s

Tip: try phoenix with -k poclbm AGGRESSION=10 WORKSIZE=256

Wow!

ArtForz

sr. member

Activity: 406

Merit: 257

Quote from: bulanula on January 19, 2012, 11:21:20 AM

Can't remember who it was but some dude got them at around 720 or 700 mhash/s !

But then the power consumed makes your MH/W ratio suck !

1-upd!
max @ stock V: 1070 core, 695Mh/s
@ 1.20V: 1170, 759Mh/s
and for shits and giggles...
@ 1.25V: 1240 core, 805Mh/s

Tip: try phoenix with -k poclbm AGGRESSION=10 WORKSIZE=256

portron

member

Activity: 106

Merit: 10

Yup, confirmed it doesn't work with GUIMiner...

I'm getting 640 m/hash on 1075mhz... at 60c w/ fans at 70%, on stock voltage (diablominer).

I was running 1125 but it was just slightly unstable and I didn't feel like bumping up the voltage.

yochdog

legendary

Activity: 2044

Merit: 1000

Quote from: bulanula on January 19, 2012, 11:21:20 AM

Quote from: rjk on January 19, 2012, 11:14:05 AM

Quote from: yochdog on January 18, 2012, 11:52:34 PM

They wont work with GUIminer.....but they absolutely rage with Diablo.

I am at 1.2 GH/s with 2 of them.....1000 Mhz core

Someone got them to 666mhash each Grin

Can't remember who it was but some dude got them at around 720 or 700 mhash/s !

But then the power consumed makes your MH/W ratio suck !

Wow....I cannot wait to get some set-up at my "Free power" location. I will push them as far as I can.

bulanula

hero member

Activity: 518

Merit: 500

Quote from: rjk on January 19, 2012, 11:14:05 AM

Quote from: yochdog on January 18, 2012, 11:52:34 PM

They wont work with GUIminer.....but they absolutely rage with Diablo.

I am at 1.2 GH/s with 2 of them.....1000 Mhz core

Someone got them to 666mhash each Grin

Can't remember who it was but some dude got them at around 720 or 700 mhash/s !

But then the power consumed makes your MH/W ratio suck !

rjk

sr. member

Activity: 448

Merit: 250

1ngldh

Quote from: yochdog on January 18, 2012, 11:52:34 PM

They wont work with GUIminer.....but they absolutely rage with Diablo.

I am at 1.2 GH/s with 2 of them.....1000 Mhz core

Someone got them to 666mhash each Grin

yochdog

legendary

Activity: 2044

Merit: 1000

They wont work with GUIminer.....but they absolutely rage with Diablo.

I am at 1.2 GH/s with 2 of them.....1000 Mhz core

jjiimm_64

legendary

Activity: 1876

Merit: 1000

Quote from: yochdog on January 17, 2012, 10:04:00 PM

Quote from: rjk on January 17, 2012, 09:34:21 PM

Quote from: yochdog on January 17, 2012, 08:36:19 PM

I have 5 of the 7970's en route..... they should arrive tomorrow.

Has anyone tried these bad boys with GUIminer yet? Didn't even think of that before I bought them.....

Right now, DiabloMiner is the fastest on them. I don't know of anyone that has tried poclbm (guiminer).

well, I will give it a whirl tomorrow and report back!

I have 4 on the way, will report with cgminer.

yochdog

legendary

Activity: 2044

Merit: 1000

Quote from: rjk on January 17, 2012, 09:34:21 PM

Quote from: yochdog on January 17, 2012, 08:36:19 PM

I have 5 of the 7970's en route..... they should arrive tomorrow.

Has anyone tried these bad boys with GUIminer yet? Didn't even think of that before I bought them.....

Right now, DiabloMiner is the fastest on them. I don't know of anyone that has tried poclbm (guiminer).

well, I will give it a whirl tomorrow and report back!

rjk

sr. member

Activity: 448

Merit: 250

1ngldh

Quote from: yochdog on January 17, 2012, 08:36:19 PM

I have 5 of the 7970's en route..... they should arrive tomorrow.

Has anyone tried these bad boys with GUIminer yet? Didn't even think of that before I bought them.....

Right now, DiabloMiner is the fastest on them. I don't know of anyone that has tried poclbm (guiminer).

yochdog

legendary

Activity: 2044

Merit: 1000

I have 5 of the 7970's en route..... they should arrive tomorrow.

Has anyone tried these bad boys with GUIminer yet? Didn't even think of that before I bought them.....

Topic: 7970's in the mail.....anyone used with GUIminer yet? (Read 4831 times)