Author

Topic: 90% of bounty hunter never care about the quality of post (Read 304 times)

sr. member
Activity: 2604
Merit: 338
Vave.com - Crypto Casino
Most of bounty mananger who often do that is their official account of the project. You will find many bounty manager that is managered by their official account, I mean the account is copper newbie.
Yeah, you are right, bounty managers especially the official project basically chooses the first come first serve basis to choose bounty and signature participants, in this case there are plenty of people that's aren't good in posting quality posts, in this case, what's actually important is the advertisement of the worn signature and avatar of the campaign.

Also, not everyone here is promoting signature campaign for a project, some people are truly here for discussing about crypto related topics, some actually promoting own company by wearing own signature and avatar., so it depends on how you want to stay or how you want to communicate with fellow community members.
Not always the basis about first come first serve because most of the time managers would really be looking on the activeness of a certain user even though he's just an average quality poster then it wouldnt matter as long

the exposure would have been meet which would really considered to be chosen.Also, not all managers are the same when it comes to selection process or criteria.Its just part of the reality inside of this forum that only

a few does mind about quality post and the rest is just really trying to reach out their post campaign quota.If you do find out that a certain post is less on quality then its better to ignore it.
sr. member
Activity: 1218
Merit: 279
Most of bounty mananger who often do that is their official account of the project. You will find many bounty manager that is managered by their official account, I mean the account is copper newbie.
Yeah, you are right, bounty managers especially the official project basically chooses the first come first serve basis to choose bounty and signature participants, in this case there are plenty of people that's aren't good in posting quality posts, in this case, what's actually important is the advertisement of the worn signature and avatar of the campaign.

Also, not everyone here is promoting signature campaign for a project, some people are truly here for discussing about crypto related topics, some actually promoting own company by wearing own signature and avatar., so it depends on how you want to stay or how you want to communicate with fellow community members.
full member
Activity: 1004
Merit: 111
i think rule in every bounty campaign such as facebook campaign, siganture campaign, twitter campaign or youtube campaign that the team project want really high and tight that needed
if okey that bounty manager accept the newbie doesnt care about their post but if they dont reach the requirement they dont get the money
so we will get what we deserve, we will get what we do

But sometimes, even some of the participants comply the complete task every week, when the campaign will be done or finish all their
bounty hunters who partake to their campaign didn't get the rewards, delayed or it is always said to just wait for the team's announcement until they can no longer hint at where the campaign was just left and abandoned. So you can't blame other bounty hunters.
full member
Activity: 1330
Merit: 147
Most of bounty mananger who often do that is their official account of the project. You will find many bounty manager that is managered by their official account, I mean the account is copper newbie.

They only need a promotion, most people will just focus on what they wear on their signature, no matter how good their post most people will just focus on signature that they are wearing.

Sometimes, I often to see the bounty board to know more about the bounty campaign thst most people wear. At least it will be a plus value for the project. This is why, bounty manager (official account) will not see the history post of the participant.
legendary
Activity: 2478
Merit: 1492
You want to see the poorest quality versus pay? Go to check out influencer Twitter;) Some have good videos but if you dig in, no quality.

Yeap, video bounty campaign is on the second place of crap promotion (first is twitter/facebook). Video has either bought views or channel has bought subscribers; they are not genuine for 99.9%. And video content - often it just scrolling through page, click and reading its content. While hunters call it review, it is more like and transcribing of page content. Terrible microphone is a total must for such videos. Like the guy is reading from under toilet seat while flashing water.
hero member
Activity: 2744
Merit: 541
Campaign Management?"Hhampuz" is the Man
There are Bunch of Bounty manager that i Knew who's very particular in the quality of posts from their bounty participants and not even allot their specific payments once they are posting poor quality of posts.

and also it is indicated in OP about the rules only the implementation is important .

I can't claim about my quality but i am doing everything just to contribute in each discussion i enters.
This exercise is been here for a long time and it will still remain in the years to come but bounty managers can make rules for making a quality post so that the hunters can follow standard quality posts.
yeah Just like what you are posting now , Some generic posts that has been mentioned already above you.
hero member
Activity: 2338
Merit: 953
Temporary forum vacation
I'm afraid you are confusing a bounty campaign with a signature campaign. Signature Campaign Manager carries out a selection and picks only the users who write the best posts as it has a limited number of places in the campaign. The Bounty Campaign Manager does not have to do this, because the participants by registering for the campaign agree to an equal distribution (according to the number of stakes) of the bounty pool.
This is a very big difference, and in the previous post I described the situation regarding a bounty campaign, not a signature campaign.

It shouldn't be a big difference, but you are right,,, bounties tend to be a lot lower in quality than in signature campaign although if we recall,,, signatures used to be part of a big bounty campaign and a lot of bounty spammers used to join them. Good thing that this forum changed to be more strict on quality.

You want to see the poorest quality versus pay? Go to check out influencer Twitter;) Some have good videos but if you dig in, no quality.

IMO the biggest problem is? 99% of people who shill never even use the product.
legendary
Activity: 2478
Merit: 1492
~
I'm afraid you are confusing a bounty campaign with a signature campaign.

But bounty campaign has signature section also. Ok, never mind.
How are you going to check if bounty hunter creates quality posts/tweets/ or simply copy/paste something from the news feed? Do you really think bounty managers are going to check social media post history before accepting? I think the only criteria they care about is the number of followers/friends/readers/subscribers. And when they check weekly tasks, they simply open all the link (for example 5 retweet and 2 tweet links), make a short look it posts have tags and words (and not just random letters) and give a stake.
sr. member
Activity: 1112
Merit: 256
In fact, it is enough for the bounty manager to create a rule that accepts only users who write quality posts. That would be enough to eliminate spammers. The truth is, the campaign owners want the project to be promoted as much as possible, so almost everyone is accepted in bounty campaigns.

Who is going to decide which post is quality and which one was written just to fill weekly quota? Bounty manager must be an expert in everything then. Bounty managers already introduced such rule btw - bounty hunter must get X merit during last 120 days. On one hand this helps to discard low quality poster, on the other merit is not moderated. Users can get merit just for posting a meme. To improve quality, managers must increase merit amount gained to be accepted, and make hunters write at least few posts in projects topic or forum section.

I'm afraid you are confusing a bounty campaign with a signature campaign. Signature Campaign Manager carries out a selection and picks only the users who write the best posts as it has a limited number of places in the campaign. The Bounty Campaign Manager does not have to do this, because the participants by registering for the campaign agree to an equal distribution (according to the number of stakes) of the bounty pool.
This is a very big difference, and in the previous post I described the situation regarding a bounty campaign, not a signature campaign.
legendary
Activity: 2478
Merit: 1492
In fact, it is enough for the bounty manager to create a rule that accepts only users who write quality posts. That would be enough to eliminate spammers. The truth is, the campaign owners want the project to be promoted as much as possible, so almost everyone is accepted in bounty campaigns.

Who is going to decide which post is quality and which one was written just to fill weekly quota? Bounty manager must be an expert in everything then. Bounty managers already introduced such rule btw - bounty hunter must get X merit during last 120 days. On one hand this helps to discard low quality poster, on the other merit is not moderated. Users can get merit just for posting a meme. To improve quality, managers must increase merit amount gained to be accepted, and make hunters write at least few posts in projects topic or forum section.
sr. member
Activity: 1112
Merit: 256
This exercise is been here for a long time and it will still remain in the years to come but bounty managers can make rules for making a quality post so that the hunters can follow standard quality posts.

In fact, it is enough for the bounty manager to create a rule that accepts only users who write quality posts. That would be enough to eliminate spammers. The truth is, the campaign owners want the project to be promoted as much as possible, so almost everyone is accepted in bounty campaigns.
legendary
Activity: 2268
Merit: 1379
Fully Regulated Crypto Casino
Not sure many bounty manager really care about the quality of the posts from the participant. This doesn't make any sense, but hasn't really been fixed for a long time. Based on my research, some of these bounty manager still accept participant who have been tagged as seemingly violating the rules legally.
Probably what you are saying are those that conduct campaign and bounty on the bounty section of altcoins. Yes majority but Im not speaking for everyone but we can really see that some are just handling campaign for the sake of payment. Regardless the post are shit or not. Its true and that can never change. I myself seen some of my Co participants on some campaign in the past. Getting paid to post shit. But for btc paid campaign its not the case majority of managers concern about tha posting habit of the participants and hence being picked for their slot.
full member
Activity: 938
Merit: 102
This exercise is been here for a long time and it will still remain in the years to come but bounty managers can make rules for making a quality post so that the hunters can follow standard quality posts.
full member
Activity: 2520
Merit: 214
Eloncoin.org - Mars, here we come!
I don't want to fool myself into not saying that 90% of forum users who join the bounty are bad posters who never care about the quality of their posts. For obvious reasons, why do these people continue to be given opportunities and get paid just for sending spam or junk?
Not sure many bounty manager really care about the quality of the posts from the participant. This doesn't make any sense, but hasn't really been fixed for a long time. Based on my research, some of these bounty manager still accept participant who have been tagged as seemingly violating the rules legally.
Don't make it hard for yourself mate because This is what happening for years now but what can we do to help the community and the forum ?

-Let's Report each post we come across that without value to the thread.

- Let's Report Each account that obviously spamming just for their Paid bounty.

- Let's Be Vigilant and active , because the forum cannot win this fight without us helping them.

Little by Little Effort if go together ? for sure we can at least Help the forum lesser Spamming .
full member
Activity: 1176
Merit: 100
The OGz Club
90% or more than that Bounty hunters never post in other thread. They never follow other thread of this forum. They never visit in other thread. They just know only one thread which is Bounty thread. Most of them are newbie ranked. They just want to earn money from Bounty. They don't care about the rules of this forum. If their account banned from forum then they don't care about it and create a new one. I think forum need to make this type of rules that after creating a new account everyone need to give an exam. By this i think newbies also know about forum rules and regulations.
hero member
Activity: 2856
Merit: 674
Most newbies or low rank maybe, they are the ones who does not fully understand what the forum is for, and they are invited here to just post and earn a stake on a  bounty that they have participated in.

We have moderators, they are looking into our post, so if 90% of the posters are spammers, then I guess this forum will not improve and might loss genuine people who are supporting it.
sr. member
Activity: 2506
Merit: 368
I don't want to fool myself into not saying that 90% of forum users who join the bounty are bad posters who never care about the quality of their posts. For obvious reasons, why do these people continue to be given opportunities and get paid just for sending spam or junk?
Not sure many bounty manager really care about the quality of the posts from the participant. This doesn't make any sense, but hasn't really been fixed for a long time. Based on my research, some of these bounty manager still accept participant who have been tagged as seemingly violating the rules legally.
Most of the bounty hunter are on newbie rank. They don not follow rules most of the time. Generally they do Facebook, twitter and other social media campaign. They are totally unaware of other thread on bitcointalk forum.
I think these people knew already the drill or maybe just following someone to do the task as fast as possible or could it be some alt accounts, who knows? Bounty managers are the one to blame for this to continue happening but it seems that they don't really care that much as long as there's a result needed in order to widen the campaign.

Yeah, probably they are totally unaware of the other thread since they were just bounty hunters participating only in social media. But the question is, who tip them to do this kind of tasks?
full member
Activity: 1750
Merit: 118
managers are the one that usually create a rule so what we are going to do if he want to accept memebers with bad tagged in their accounts but sometimes its the owner of the company can instruct the manager and they can say that only users with clean trust can join the campaign  and for the quality , good managers can know this thing and if not the manager we still have moderators that can cleam spam post so dont worry and by the way i notice that your name is similar to darkstar (including that underscore )   Cheesy are you a fan of him
sr. member
Activity: 1750
Merit: 267
I don't want to fool myself into not saying that 90% of forum users who join the bounty are bad posters who never care about the quality of their posts. For obvious reasons, why do these people continue to be given opportunities and get paid just for sending spam or junk?
Not sure many bounty manager really care about the quality of the posts from the participant. This doesn't make any sense, but hasn't really been fixed for a long time. Based on my research, some of these bounty manager still accept participant who have been tagged as seemingly violating the rules legally.
Most of the bounty hunter are on newbie rank. They don not follow rules most of the time. Generally they do Facebook, twitter and other social media campaign. They are totally unaware of other thread on bitcointalk forum.
hero member
Activity: 3010
Merit: 794
Just simply tells that if you cant reach up the qouta then you wont really get paid and in result? You would really be spamming hell of a lot and wont really like to miss out 1 week stake to be waste up.
Simply does show that people arent really caring about quality of post due of hurrying up and minding only on finishing the job in shortest time as possibe.Some do make this as a side income this is why
putting up too much effort would really be adding up on the cost.

Reasons are:
-Just lazy
-Dont have much knowledge
-Aiming for the pay and doesnt really take the task seriously

As just others say that you should get used to it.
full member
Activity: 785
Merit: 105
Ice cream quality articles are mostly hunter articles for the campaign, and almost all hunters are novices so spamming is inevitable. Cases of non-compliance will be disqualified, and if the BMs cannot do that, they should not be considered.
hero member
Activity: 2996
Merit: 609
I don't want to fool myself into not saying that 90% of forum users who join the bounty are bad posters who never care about the quality of their posts. For obvious reasons, why do these people continue to be given opportunities and get paid just for sending spam or junk?
Not sure many bounty manager really care about the quality of the posts from the participant. This doesn't make any sense, but hasn't really been fixed for a long time. Based on my research, some of these bounty manager still accept participant who have been tagged as seemingly violating the rules legally.

This is reality but there's nothing we can do if you really mind on getting rid of those shit post and non relevant post because they would really be existing no matter what.

if you're stressed on seeing those shit post then you can always have the option to ignore or report such post if you do find it to be shit or non relevant.

Forum features are there which you can really make use of or you could also report the user who had been shitposting and make some spam post.This might not be a total solution of getting rid of spams or getting rid of low quality but at least you have done your part.
hero member
Activity: 2282
Merit: 560
_""""Duelbits""""_
I don't want to fool myself into not saying that 90% of forum users who join the bounty are bad posters who never care about the quality of their posts.
I think Bounty Hunters are bad posters so they only participate in Bounty. If they were quality posters, then of course they would take part in various discussions in the forum. And if everyone were quality posters, Bounty Hunters would not be found. Good and bad everyone is the part of our forum. I don't think it's right to ignore Bounty Hunters.  Because the forum has created a bounty opportunity.
The average hunter now is a newbie who just came and did a bounty promotion. I think there are many, even thousands, who come to this forum just to chase bounties to make money.
They come to this forum not to discuss, but only to be filled with many bounty reports every week. That is why now there is a lot of spam happening there because even menager can't do anything because their job is to manage with many who promote.

The point is, if the goal is only for money then in the future they will not think independently how to get insights from this forum with lots of discussion.
sr. member
Activity: 1112
Merit: 256
I don't want to fool myself into not saying that 90% of forum users who join the bounty are bad posters who never care about the quality of their posts. For obvious reasons, why do these people continue to be given opportunities and get paid just for sending spam or junk?
Not sure many bounty manager really care about the quality of the posts from the participant. This doesn't make any sense, but hasn't really been fixed for a long time. Based on my research, some of these bounty manager still accept participant who have been tagged as seemingly violating the rules legally.

When it comes to the quality of posts in the bounty campaign, it is obvious that it is lower than in the signature campaign. The main point is that signature campaigns are paid in BTC or other quickly convertible crypto, and bounty campaigns are paid in tokens that do not know what (or at all) will have value after the campaign ends.
When it comes to bounty managers, I'm sure they pay attention to the participants' posts. If they don't, it means that it is a very bad bounty manager.
member
Activity: 893
Merit: 43
Random coins :)
I don't think thats true!
If you saying 90% don't care thats saying 90% of these campaigns are made up by spammers which is something the forum is against or at least discourages!
If this is true, you could always hit the report button whenever you see such posts and probably report this to the campaign manager who will most likely sort this out and save the campaign from further spam.

member
Activity: 364
Merit: 12
I don't want to fool myself into not saying that 90% of forum users who join the bounty are bad posters who never care about the quality of their posts.
I think Bounty Hunters are bad posters so they only participate in Bounty. If they were quality posters, then of course they would take part in various discussions in the forum. And if everyone were quality posters, Bounty Hunters would not be found. Good and bad everyone is the part of our forum. I don't think it's right to ignore Bounty Hunters.  Because the forum has created a bounty opportunity.
legendary
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1228
Playgram - The Telegram Casino
I apologize for not being able to respond to you one by one. But I thank everyone who answered.
Some options that might be good when we find users posting junk or useless posts is to report to the moderator and also send PMs to the campaign manager. It's actually an easy task, but if everyone is doing the same then I don't think the moderators have enough time for that. Let's take a look at this moderation policy.

The policy to not remove anything worked when the forum was small. Now that we have thousands of posts a day, we can't afford 50% of them being junk. The moderators are now instructed to be less tolerant of low-value posts.

Some guidelines:

1. Free speech - you can say anything as long as it is relevant and presented in a calm and polite manner. Swearing, SHOUTING etc. make your post more likely to be removed.
2. No zero value posts or threads, like "SELL SELL SELL"
3. No pointless or uninteresting threads.
4. No referral code spam
5. No NSFW content

In essence, I don't want to make you think that what I'm saying is to solve problems, but you should use your common sense to judge positives and make people aware of the quality of writing with a background in knowledge and experience. Look at them, so afraid to post on a thread that has a lot of competent users. My heart says it's time for a _BlackStar to shine. Thank you.

There are very few rules you have to obey if you want to be a quality poster and you probably won't be dimmed by it.

legendary
Activity: 2366
Merit: 1130
If you think those bounty hunters are spamming, you can always report all of their posts to moderator or even contact the bounty manager where they joined. No need to disscuss like this since creating such topic like this won't solve the problem of spam post.
legendary
Activity: 2814
Merit: 1112
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
Cannot be denied that this is happening, then you can play a role by reporting any posts that indicate spam or out off topics.
Perhaps why are many bounty hunters whose posts are included in low quality posts but are still accepted by BM because of the large number of participants so that BM has difficulty checking one by one the posts of the participants applying for their bounties, and many BM who hold more than one bounty campaign, thereby reducing the ability to maintain the quality of their participants this reason cannot be accepted but exist.
legendary
Activity: 2464
Merit: 2094
What you are complaining about right now is something that has been happening for years and will probably never stop. If you care about forum rule and cleanliness, use common sense to report any post that you find low quality, spam, or useless. This is an easy task until you feel that the button will be of use to anyone.

I also don't deny that there are some bounty manager who don't seem to really care about the quality of participants' post, they just want to recruit participant to spread awareness of the ongoing project. As long as participant can meet the requirement required by the bounty, participant will get paid even though they do not meet the expected quality. But I also believe that there are manager who have strict rule about the participant they want to work with, they are selective enough that someone could still potentially be disqualified if caught as a spam and low-quality poster.
legendary
Activity: 2422
Merit: 1083
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
Well, what can I say, you might be right @poster, but I will say that I think it has to do with mentality, some people under some circumstances are always in a hurry to complete their work or meet up with their target number of post that they end up not caring whether what they post make sense or not.
Other have to do with the topic in question, not all but some will agree with me that most of the topics we see on different sections of this platform are nothing but shit post, when a topic does not make sense, it is highly possible that the replies that topic will get will not make any sense too, and another thing is that some people are just naturally bad posters, nothing can be done about this set of people except to keep teaching them until they learn.
hero member
Activity: 2086
Merit: 761
To boldly go where no rabbit has gone before...
I don't want to fool myself into not saying that 90% of forum users who join the bounty are bad posters who never care about the quality of their posts. For obvious reasons, why do these people continue to be given opportunities and get paid just for sending spam or junk?
Not sure many bounty manager really care about the quality of the posts from the participant. This doesn't make any sense, but hasn't really been fixed for a long time. Based on my research, some of these bounty manager still accept participant who have been tagged as seemingly violating the rules legally.

You got it the other way around. It's the bounty managers that don't care about quality of posts.
If BM's would penalize shitposting, then there would be less of it. But many don't. They just check post count and say "he did his 30 posts for the week"
full member
Activity: 742
Merit: 102
Second Live
I don't want to fool myself into not saying that 90% of forum users who join the bounty are bad posters who never care about the quality of their posts. For obvious reasons, why do these people continue to be given opportunities and get paid just for sending spam or junk?
Not sure many bounty manager really care about the quality of the posts from the participant. This doesn't make any sense, but hasn't really been fixed for a long time. Based on my research, some of these bounty manager still accept participant who have been tagged as seemingly violating the rules legally.
You should accept this trash on the forums, it is inevitable to launch a bounty campaign. The BMs will have their own way, and sometimes it may be imperfect, but we don't have to be so absolute in everything. If you find that the BM does not follow the procedure, you can contact directly or in a worse case, underestimate them on the forum.
full member
Activity: 1498
Merit: 146
I don't want to fool myself into not saying that 90% of forum users who join the bounty are bad posters who never care about the quality of their posts. For obvious reasons, why do these people continue to be given opportunities and get paid just for sending spam or junk?
Not sure many bounty manager really care about the quality of the posts from the participant. This doesn't make any sense, but hasn't really been fixed for a long time. Based on my research, some of these bounty manager still accept participant who have been tagged as seemingly violating the rules legally.
The bounty campaign itself a junk that is why people who post something make sense avoiding them for very long time so the bounty teams are exposing the projects with the participants they get. And there is no loss for the bounty team due to the spammers and not much reputed campaign managers also promoting bounties these days. So now hunters needs to stop because team itself managing their bounties most of the time.
legendary
Activity: 2072
Merit: 4265
✿♥‿♥✿
Today some managers have their own blacklists. If the manager sees bad or empty posts, he can easily remove such a member and add him to the blacklist. You also have the option to report to moderators if you see low-quality posts.
But something else is important and interesting. Bad posters need to understand that with their level of publication, it will be difficult for them to get into a company that can pay well. And here you need a choice, or try and write competent posts, thereby being able to earn a little, or just spend time on companies that may not pay at all.
legendary
Activity: 3178
Merit: 1054

i feel you OP, we already know that the 10% that are like me are the only ones who care.  Cheesy

the bounty manager could really impose strict rules when it comes to accepting participants so he can make sure that the only ones who join are the ones that can participate in a good discussion. this will however make the campaign slightly unsuccessful since the goal of promoting a new project is to make their project visible to the community. if only a few people can participate, the project might not get attention.
hero member
Activity: 2268
Merit: 588
You own the pen
I don't want to fool myself into not saying that 90% of forum users who join the bounty are bad posters who never care about the quality of their posts. For obvious reasons, why do these people continue to be given opportunities and get paid just for sending spam or junk?
Not sure many bounty manager really care about the quality of the posts from the participant. This doesn't make any sense, but hasn't really been fixed for a long time. Based on my research, some of these bounty manager still accept participant who have been tagged as seemingly violating the rules legally.

The only problem is the massive number of the bounty project which is of course need a huge number of bounty participants as well and the end result is, those who care about their posts often recruited to the legit signature campaigns because of their posts qualities. Those who are not capable of doing such things are listed to the token signature campaign and I'm not saying all of them are trash posters some of them are also fine and doing their job well. But the main cause of this problem is the number of signature campaigns in the bounty section which required lots of users to join.
member
Activity: 1260
Merit: 21
If the accounts that are joining mainly are newbies, you could expect that kind of quality from them. Not all, but there is a lot for sure. I think their bounty's main reason is to get noticed and be advertised whether or not it's quality. That's up to the bounty manager to decide.

I think it's still best to go to do bounty if they are being managed by a great campaign manager, great meaning trustworthy, and abides by the rules.
But in every Bounty page for the project, the rules are always there about what the bounty managers want with regards to the quality of posts that is expected from a bounty Hunter but the thing is, hunters will always want to complete their number of post required but whether it is considered quality enough or not but it is the responsibility of who ever is in charge to check those posts and I believe the bounty managers do because I have seen on many bounty spreadsheets where bounty managers have not awarded points, reasons are “Need quality post”
So you might not see it here on the thread but it is noted on their bounty sheet where the points are been awarded.
sr. member
Activity: 1736
Merit: 357
Peace be with you!
I don't want to fool myself into not saying that 90% of forum users who join the bounty are bad posters who never care about the quality of their posts. For obvious reasons, why do these people continue to be given opportunities and get paid just for sending spam or junk?
Not sure many bounty manager really care about the quality of the posts from the participant. This doesn't make any sense, but hasn't really been fixed for a long time. Based on my research, some of these bounty manager still accept participant who have been tagged as seemingly violating the rules legally.
I don't think other bounty managers check them manually because they even accept and pay cheaters I wonder why they can't spot and disqualify them all. But shitposting is not a problem anymore since moderators are checking them regularly and delete all of those kind of posts.
hero member
Activity: 2632
Merit: 833
I don't want to fool myself into not saying that 90% of forum users who join the bounty are bad posters who never care about the quality of their posts. For obvious reasons, why do these people continue to be given opportunities and get paid just for sending spam or junk?

This has been the problem since 2017 bull run, a lot of newbies joined this community just to do bounty hunting. And it's the most frown activity here, but what can we do? they bring traffic to this community that Theymos are not going to totally ban bounties here.

Not sure many bounty manager really care about the quality of the posts from the participant. This doesn't make any sense, but hasn't really been fixed for a long time. Based on my research, some of these bounty manager still accept participant who have been tagged as seemingly violating the rules legally.

Don't generalised things, there could be bounty managers who are very strict as far as post quality is concern before accepting participants.
full member
Activity: 658
Merit: 102
PredX - AI-Powered Prediction Market
I don't want to fool myself into not saying that 90% of forum users who join the bounty are bad posters who never care about the quality of their posts. For obvious reasons, why do these people continue to be given opportunities and get paid just for sending spam or junk?
Not sure many bounty manager really care about the quality of the posts from the participant. This doesn't make any sense, but hasn't really been fixed for a long time. Based on my research, some of these bounty manager still accept participant who have been tagged as seemingly violating the rules legally.
Bounty hunters also have a lot of newcomers, and I'm sure they won't understand the rules of legal use on the forums. But I think it's not 90% but 99.9% because those links are only reporting for their work in the campaigns they in participate.
member
Activity: 336
Merit: 10
i think rule in every bounty campaign such as facebook campaign, siganture campaign, twitter campaign or youtube campaign that the team project want really high and tight that needed
if okey that bounty manager accept the newbie doesnt care about their post but if they dont reach the requirement they dont get the money
so we will get what we deserve, we will get what we do
copper member
Activity: 2940
Merit: 1280
https://linktr.ee/crwthopia
If the accounts that are joining mainly are newbies, you could expect that kind of quality from them. Not all, but there is a lot for sure. I think their bounty's main reason is to get noticed and be advertised whether or not it's quality. That's up to the bounty manager to decide.

I think it's still best to go to do bounty if they are being managed by a great campaign manager, great meaning trustworthy, and abides by the rules.
legendary
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1228
Playgram - The Telegram Casino
I don't want to fool myself into not saying that 90% of forum users who join the bounty are bad posters who never care about the quality of their posts. For obvious reasons, why do these people continue to be given opportunities and get paid just for sending spam or junk?
Not sure many bounty manager really care about the quality of the posts from the participant. This doesn't make any sense, but hasn't really been fixed for a long time. Based on my research, some of these bounty manager still accept participant who have been tagged as seemingly violating the rules legally.
Jump to: