Your project sounds more than true at same time not looking that possible as you have just explicitly explained in letters. Like paying yields to depositors how do make up for that , next, you said it's going to operate like a traditional bank, if am right then it's going to be under government regulatory policy and bitcoin as a cryptocurrency is well known for it decentralization and doesn't operates under government regulations like traditional banks does .
So how do your project deal with this incongruent
aspect as I see many BTC investors like myself dragging looking at the area I just point out.
Hi Lida,
It could look like this:
100 Million USD worth of BTC Certificates of Deposit
Interest Expense: 3% ($3 Million)
79 Million USD denominated loans with matching durations to Certificates of Deposit
Interest Income: 5% ($3.95 Million)
21 Million (26.5% of loan balances) in USD Certificates of Deposit held as collateral for CME BTC Futures trading account
Interest Income: 4.00% ($840k)*
*When CDs mature, the bank will owe its depositors the original amount of their Bitcoin deposit back (before the Bitcoin was converted to a USD denominated loan asset). If Bitcoin has increased in value, the bank will need to purchase Bitcoin in the open market at a cost
higher than it originally sold its depositors' Bitcoin for. To mitigate for this appreciation risk of Bitcoin, the bank will roll over 30 day Bitcoin Futures contracts. The trading costs will be minimal, but the collateral required for the margin loan will be 26%. If Bitcoin decreases in value prior to loan maturity, the bank will need to contribute additional capital to cover the margin call, until the loan is repaid, exchanged for Bitcoin, and returned to depositor in full (albeit at its then depreciated value).
The question I think we need to answer is if this self-custody alternative would appeal to those long Bitcoin (Bitcoiners)?Regarding regulation, the bank wouldn't hold any $ deposits, only Bitcoin. Therefore, it wouldn't be FDIC insured. If the bank were to become insolvent, the depositors' Bitcoin would be at risk. Its loans could be just as legally enforceable as any other contract between a lender and a borrower in the U.S.
Here's a great interview of George Selgin by Russ Roberts that discusses how a free banking system works in free markets, and why it's better.
https://www.econtalk.org/selgin-on-free-banking/