Author

Topic: A Corporation Is A Person, So Sayeth The Law ... (Read 954 times)

donator
Activity: 1736
Merit: 1010
Let's talk governance, lipstick, and pigs.
February 09, 2013, 07:58:03 PM
#8
There is nothing in the constitution that protects corporations from anything. It should have been the corporation that got the ticket for not qualifying as a natural person to ride in the carpool lane, or wearing a seatbelt for that matter. Just saying. There are a lot of way of looking at this. America just happens to choose the most corporate-friendly interpretations.
full member
Activity: 166
Merit: 101
Given the context, the intention of the carpool rules was clearly to be about natural persons.  The court can decide to apply this interpretation to the car pool rules, without the ruling meaning that corporate persons are no longer legal persons in general.
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100

Quote
When Jonathan Frieman of San Rafael, Calif., was pulled over for driving alone in the carpool lane, he argued to the officer that, actually, he did have a passenger.

He waved his corporation papers at the officer, he told NBCBayArea.com, saying that corporations are people under California law.

Frieman doesn't actually support this notion. For more than 10 years, Frieman says he had been trying to get pulled over to get ticketed and to take his argument to court -- to challenge a judge to determine that corporations and people are not the same. Mission accomplished in October, when he was slapped with a fine -- a minimum of $481.

Interesting. Let us know how this one turns out.

He should prevail. I hope some human rights organization could support its course.
legendary
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1057
Marketing manager - GO MP
That way trolling was meant to be.
legendary
Activity: 924
Merit: 1004
Firstbits: 1pirata
So it begins...  Roll Eyes
hero member
Activity: 926
Merit: 1001
weaving spiders come not here

Quote
When Jonathan Frieman of San Rafael, Calif., was pulled over for driving alone in the carpool lane, he argued to the officer that, actually, he did have a passenger.

He waved his corporation papers at the officer, he told NBCBayArea.com, saying that corporations are people under California law.

Frieman doesn't actually support this notion. For more than 10 years, Frieman says he had been trying to get pulled over to get ticketed and to take his argument to court -- to challenge a judge to determine that corporations and people are not the same. Mission accomplished in October, when he was slapped with a fine -- a minimum of $481.

Interesting. Let us know how this one turns out.

Can do. I believe the cop won't show up or the case will be dismissed. Ain't no way they are going to let Santa Clara County v Southern Pacific Railroad  be challenged/revisited, and its effects on all the ruling since 1886.. especially Citizens United v Federal Election Commission in 2010.  

But wouldnt it be interesting times if it did... thats what I'm hoping as well.
hero member
Activity: 532
Merit: 500
FIAT LIBERTAS RVAT CAELVM

Quote
When Jonathan Frieman of San Rafael, Calif., was pulled over for driving alone in the carpool lane, he argued to the officer that, actually, he did have a passenger.

He waved his corporation papers at the officer, he told NBCBayArea.com, saying that corporations are people under California law.

Frieman doesn't actually support this notion. For more than 10 years, Frieman says he had been trying to get pulled over to get ticketed and to take his argument to court -- to challenge a judge to determine that corporations and people are not the same. Mission accomplished in October, when he was slapped with a fine -- a minimum of $481.

Interesting. Let us know how this one turns out.
Jump to: