Thanks for the review! I think how your formatted everything flowed well and was quite comprehensive.
One thing you might want to add to further clarify your thoughts on each part of the ICO is a 1-5 rating for each portion of the project you are rating. In that manner, it's easier to truly know understand which areas were the best/worst when giving your final opinion.
One thing you might want to add to further clarify your thoughts on each part of the ICO is a 1-5 rating for each portion of the project you are rating. In that manner, it's easier to truly know understand which areas were the best/worst when giving your final opinion.
I could do that. I was considering it, but now I think it might be a good idea. Anyway, I plan to review mostly bullshit ICOs, like really bad ones and bash them to the fucking ground. I think that would be more entertaining both for me and for the viewers