The strategy is too aggressive in my opinion
i agree, and that is what makes it interesting
Going double or nothing is perhaps a good way to lose fast but hitting enough wins in a row so you can withdraw from a single faucet claim is just too unlikely.
it is a lose fast win fast kind of strategy in my opinion. to make it better, i believe it is best to come up with a number of rolls for example 10 to 15 and you never go above that number. and stop after it.
I remember once I tried to gamble on multiple gambling sites at a time. Opened 4 or 5 dice gambling sites then I went for betting all the faucet amounts to do or die kind of attempts. If I keep on winning I will be sticking with one site otherwise I will switch over to next one and will do bet with all faucet amount and keep repeating the steps and finally come back to the first site and claim faucet and then continued.
This is a good way to kill our time and nothing else. When we are sure about we will lose everything at the end, I believe no gambler will be finding fun with it like what I have concluded.
i liked the name, so i am going to call it "roll or die".
but i don't like the opening of multiple sites. it is going to take all my time then. i am doing other things while i make bets for example i am reading bitcointalk and making some posts then i go make a bet then i go check my orders in the exchange to make some trades and ....
to the two posters above:
why are you calling it "reverse martingale" because from what i read once about martingale and its reverse. the reverse version is when you start with max amount and if you win you put
the same amount again and if you lose you
decrease the amount. and it actually is called reverse because you decrease it not increase the amount like martingale.
or am i missing something?
to OP
i have to try this, it should be fun
this is correct, reverse martingale is different.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martingale_%28betting_system%29#Anti-martingale