Topic: About this shit Hamster Kombat airdrop? (Read 603 times)

I usually don't want to join the second season after getting a small amount of money, because so many users should never expect to get a lot of money.  However, the price they brought to the exchange could not sustain the market, and the team made no effort to keep the market price of their coins normal.  I will basically not sell the amount of tokens I have and keep it for a long time.  Because at the current price there is a five dollar completion limit.

It's sad that he first season didn't meet up with the expectations of players and yet they are already live with a second season which is mainly going to be really a different from the first season and I believe will have even more stiff conditions around it more than they did with the first because of the numbers of players they were able to gather so they will be hoping to have similar in the second season which I doubt because many persons got disappointed and are actually leaving the game, except it promises to be better else it's one of the worst ever as players were just used to get the project to have a Large commission of which players didn't get to benefit enough from.

For a project to be big, there is need for a referral so the new people joining the community can keep increasing. This is the way the Hamster Kombat community suddenly increased within a short period of time and many people keep wondering about how the community gained such a huge numbers of miners.The airdrop was huge but many people misunderstood how airdrop works. When the numbers of users suddenly increases, much rewards should not be expected from the team. Just imagine a community that has more than 100 millions users planning to share tokens to close to that number. This means majority of miners would not get something tangible from it.

All I can read from my friends and communities where hamsters are the big topic are they are dumping and moving out of disappointment, Hamster will continue to exist, but it will not regain the popularity it once had. They will have to do better to get the attention of investors.

This is a reminisce of the Play To Earn concept I was involved in four years ago, like DPET where there was like a goldrush movement, people were in a hurry to buy and play and were disappointed because of the rewards they were getting, The community is wiser now; they will not let developers use them as their cash cow and retirement plan, and this is what the community sees on Hamster.
With what happened with Hamster and what will likely happen to X Empire on their distribution, people will slowly lose interest in these Telegram-based airdrops.

Yes i completely agree with you.
The Hamster team used the large community it had to achieve the largest possible profit without rewarding them for the effort and time they wasted. It was just illusions, but we must not forget that the entire project is based on the community, and this is the mistake that the  team made, as  At the end of the first step the number of participants began to decrease constantly. We can say that the Hamster team deceived society, but lost it and lost trust because it would have had a great future.

Yes, tons of people had been on great disappointment into their airdrop career with these projects and so as with the others airdrops in the past and this isnt something new on which there would really be those people who would really be that having that huge disappointment but of course lets just simply move on because not all projects would really turned out to be successful and this is why it will really be just that normal
that there would really be those people who would really be that expecting too much or they are really that too positive when making profits with it. This is why if you are really that having some engagement with
airdrops then expect that not all projects will really be positive or something that will be ended up on having value.So that you wont really be ending up on having any problems if ever they turned out to be shit.
The wrong thing about people is that they are really that imagining that they could buy something or huge profits with less tasks that they are really that into. It will really be that understandable that failure rate will
be that high. If a certain project fails then it move into the next one and never stick and anticipate positively because it will really be bringing out that huge disappointment.

I also agree with you that without those people who are actively inviting others and running their own promotional campaign to gain more people who will register under them, they are the reason why the project is as large as it is, and those who they invite will also invite others.
 
They didn't just spend their time; they also spent resources, which is why their efforts will definitely be rewarded. Most projects also ignore the importance of referrals, which is the reason why they reward influencers hugely.

The reason why people with a lot of referrals made money was because they are the ones who grew it, maybe you personally didn't learn from a referral or didn't participated form a referral, but with their help HK became something big, thanks to people who referred many others, it became something that tens of millions of people participated, so I am fine with those people making more money than doing a few simple tasks per day.

I do not think that value a person who just clicks a few times a day brings is bigger than a person who brought in a lot of people to this project. This is why I believe the fairness is not questionable, the people who deserve it the most got what they deserve. Obviously you may disagree with this and you do, but I wanted to talk about their perspective.

Almost everyone was disappointed in the Hamster Kombat airdrop, and I feel that people are complaining based on their low cashouts from the project. Before the Hamster was launched, many people's expectations were so high, thinking they would have a huge cashout. However, at the end of the day, what they got was far lower than what they were expecting. People thought they would make money from the Hamster the same way some made money from Notcoin. But if you ask me, it looks like the reason why many people did not get a reasonable cashout from the Hamster project is that more people participated in the project compared to Notcoin and other recent airdrops.


There are still some people who are mining the project, but honestly, I would say that more than half of those who mined in the previous season are no longer mining. This is because they were disappointed with the project's first season allocation. However, that is the nature of airdrops; not every airdrop will perform as expected. It would be better if we always managed our expectations regarding airdrops and anticipated possible disappointment from any airdrop.

When a project is first released that is the time to make it a better thing and we can't really consider it growing after a while. If a project is good then the moments of first days should be the time when you see some attention and demand for the token, if there is no demand on the early days then there won't be any demand for later on neither. I get there might be some people who may consider otherwise but that is not going to be true and we are going to end up with a bad result in the end.

This should be the most important part, and we could make this work one way or another. Reality of the situation we are in today is getting bitcoin and other strong coins, those are the only way out of poverty and not these silly stuff.

Clearly such cases are not so much a play to earn kind of situation but rather just another make money marketing from home kind of offer.

Even in a more-purely play to earn situation though players interested in being able to do so (to earn by playing) over a long term ought to consider the long term viability of the game, which most likely means, among other things, avoiding being a griefer, and as we can clearly see from the volume of posts expressing basically "I/we have been griefed by these so called airdrops!", griefing seems in actuality to be the primary intention of virtually all the players, including those who are complaining!

Oh noes, you the wannabe-griefers got griefed, shocking!

Selling to existing buy offers, as distinct from making a sell offer at a price no extant buy offer is at that moment offering to buy at, is known as taking, look it up. In the context of a play-to-earn game, it can be and from the volume of complaints we are seeing lately often is a form of griefing.

If being griefed themselves helps drive griefers away, maybe games will be better off for hopefully going forward a lesser number of griefers involved.

If you want the playing you earn from to be a well-paying gig, you should take care to help make the ecosystem productive, to provide value for your fellow-players as well as yourself and maybe even to think about how much you really need bells and whistles that might among other things increase the bandwidth and computation costs that are "overhead" expenses coming between you the player and your share of overall revenues of the game you choose as one of your "gigs".

Do you want to gig at something whose primary expenses are technology bandwidth and advertising or whose primary expense is retaining players who make the game interesting, enjoyable, absorbing, fascinating, engaging, rewarding, satisfying, etc etc etc... ?


-MarkM-

Any of those explanation given the only thing understand by people is they give unfair rewards to their participants. To many people expect to much on Hamster combat and this indicate that even if the project became known there's still no guarantee for them to earn huge profit with them. That's why people should settle up their expectation and don't hope for something unrealistic or didn't come yet. Since for profit then possibly that they will just get disappointed if same lik Hamster Kombat Project will came out.

I really see lots of complains coming on since I think almost everyone didn't like what happen on their distribution since people just get unfair share from them. Also there's nothing else to do since distribution happen, Instead they complain much better for those people to move on and seek for other potential project.

I was one of the participants in season 1, because I was late in transferring my hard-earned assets when the claim was opened to the exchange that was directed, my final choice was only EBI which was available.

In terms of delivery, but the most disappointing thing is that the exchange's performance was beyond my expectations, only the sell option that was available for us to buy was no longer possible. The WD option to other exchanges was also disabled.

My question here is, why did the EBI Exchange Option hamster the input for users without looking at the aspects that provide convenience like other exchanges. I'm sure there are quite a lot of tokens locked with them.

I don't quite understand what the resources are here, are some people using money to boost their points or something like that, but if it's time I think it is, because I also feel like I'm wasting a lot of time on this project but what they're giving us isn't worth the time we put into doing all the tasks that need to be done, and what's more disappointing here is that those who have more referrals get the most benefits than those who do all the tasks, that's where I think they're being unfair and there's a lot of complaining going on.

Hamster Kombat had so many participants that participated in the mining, which is what the team really wants because they will be able to get more awareness, which they got because everyone that I know on Telegram was mining Hamster Kombat. Lots of people joined Telegram just because they wanted to mine also, but what everyone got at the end was really disappointing, they listed the coin so low, and people couldn’t get so much from the airdrop. Lots of people lost interest in all this Telegram mining. I saw people delete their Telegram account just because they expected so much from Hamster, but they got disappointed.

I don’t even hear people talk about season two, I will say most people won’t participate in the second season because of the disappointment they got in the first season. If people received a reasonable amount of money in the first season, then they will be serious with the second season, but everyone already knows they won’t get anything in the second season.

I think it'd become problematic for this coin because lot of the project participants has been anticipating for the launch of the coin on acquiring valuable values for profitablity after being listed in the exchanges but it suddenly and too early for the coin to just seems valueless at its first perk.
Participants of this Hamster Kombat coin are out lamenting of invested what the project finally earned them. A lot have crying out loud of lost of resources. I don't know the kind of encouragement the developers may give to future investors to invest their funds on it when it hasn't been impressive in the first time at it launch.

Expectations shouldn't be too high for projects like that, you are right.
HK shilled itself into oblivion, so people thought they would've got a good sum for it, but they didn't.

We all more or less know that it is not possible to earn a lot of money from airdrop so if you dream of getting a lot of money from airdrop it will never materialize. Hamster has paid millions of users so if a single person gets paid even $1 that means they have shared millions of dollars for free. How do you expect a huge amount of payment where millions of users work? That means you have no idea about crypto market. and you don't know how to analyze cryptocurrency

The example with the pizza is great.
It's too easy for everybody to grab, so, everybody will get only a small amount of it.
Simple as that.

I had friends who did it as well, none of them got anything over 50 dollars, which is ap roof this wasn't really worth it. They spent hours on their phone everyday for over a month, and in return they got less than fifty bucks, it doesn't worth spending that much time.

But one of them made a very clever explanation, they would have spent time watching instagram reels or play stupid games if they weren't doing this anyways, so they didn't really lose any time, they just switched tiktok stupidity for this game and made some money from it as well, not a lot, very small, but still better than zero. So I think people should still be happy, there are people out there who watch tiktokers all day everyday, so I say this is much better to have something like this than do that, at least you made some profit.

People should get used to what they got for free in crypto, will cost a lot in a very, very rare case. And the more hype is around, more people participating, this always means that they will get little. Sort of a trying to share 1 pizza among 100 people and hope to get full in the end. That is impossible. Same as impossible to receive a lot only for tapping on a screen. Hamster wasnt the first of its kinds, so its obvious it wont become big.

Though i ignore this airdrop but still its not expected. Many of my friends did this airdrop i was busy and don’t have much believe this kind of project though some of them paid a good amount lile Dogs. However memecoin is like that which don’t have any certain future and also don’t have much concern on crypto. They come and makes hype to get a market value and after they scam. However though Hamster listed on few exchange but the price and airdrop distribution aren’t expected. Hope we need to avoid this kind of project.

The gotcha about holding and not selling immediately has historically (e.g. bitcoin itself) been, as non-miners often pointed out to miners, that it turned out a lot cheaper to just go ahead and buy in when the miners (clickers, players) dumped than to waste time, effort and resources actually doing the mining (clicking, playing).

With XRP and the XLM airdrops I did indeed simply hold, I had a policy back then, starting initially with IXC and I0C, that I would not even bother with the hassle of getting my node up to date to check my balance, let alone consider actually selling, until I could get at least $1 per coin for them, as I only had maybe 10k to 20k of them at the time;

XRP I had 105k (airdrop glitched, restarted giving 50k all over again to posters to the thread here then later there was another 5k drop), XLM only 5k (even that soon after XRP airdrop they only gave 5k per poster to the thread), but still, my precedent stuck so I easily held until the late 2017 - early 2018 peak market.

But again, as the non-miners used to eagerly point out, I coulda just bought it for half a cent per coin or less during the intervening years, no need to waste time and effort posting my address to the giveaway thread (which type of thread has since been banned here it seems).

-MarkM-

Why do people always expect to get a lot of money from a hype project that has hundred thousands participants, or have huge expectation from airdrops or from doing simple tasks. Cant wait for people to understand, that it is impossible to get a lot after doing minimum effort. I am just curious how much people wanted to receive? Spend few minutes a day during several months and get thousands? Why do people call it shit airdrop? Because of the low price? How about holding and not selling immediately?

My points exactly. I'm of the same opinion with yours. A project which ran for several months ended up banning accounts for cheats after setting a bait for them with their key generator then went ahead to share peanuts to their users in what they called 90% allocation.

My conviction is, they weren't prepared to launch it even in the first place but were faced with uncontrollably number of users already and had to pop up revenues to cater for them however little. They ought to have planned better.

Yeah, maybe you are right too - but people with farms, good ones with that (having proxies for each one of them and accounts that wouldn't be suspended) did get good results from DOGS (the recent project in the same motive), so, I do think that some did the same in HK, they are just even smaller profits in comparison, and it was harder, probably. So, overall, HK didn't play out as it needed for the trend to continue.

Yes, the profit obtained from this airdrop is not large, even so, they still pay it from the results we do by tapping it, from what I see, the popularity of this airdrop is very much visited by many people from this year's trend, even though there is disappointment from its fans.

I think differently. What people mean about not giving them is that they don't get what they expect from Hamster.

That's true, they expected much from this airdrop, but they have a reason for it. They have wasted months, or almost a year for it. So, i see nothing wrong with seeing their disappointment or enraged.

They should, at the very least, get a worthy amount of money that would pay back their time wasted on it. I am very disappointed with how Hamster fooled all of them. I hope people realize that working at Mcdonald paid them better instead of doing tap tap airdrop.

Worst airdrop of the year when compared to the popularity and the hypes with all the assurance from the developers about the token going to cook more than any previously airdropped this year and I guess it was part of everything that raised participants expectations about hamster Kombat.

People really got disappointed and why the rapid dump that led to it's price fall not long after it was list, I so doubt it will rise and gain significant value above when it is right now because the level of dump was massive and quite a few people still have interest in their second mining phase which can be possible that the project could die a natural death along the way.

HK had no anti-botting measures. What did you expect?

Aside of the fact that it was probably botted to hell, the authors probably kept most for themselves. Most aidrop recepients get so little they consider it's not even worth to withdraw and will just abandon their coins. This is calculated rather than unexpected. Otherwise the known story is that everyone dumps and the price tanks. Very few airdrops are actually fair to their participants historically. Keep that in mind. It's a moonshot anyway, you lost your precious time.

Next time value your time and learn something good or make some friends or meet a real person at least. I also playacted this game and I'm not afraid to admit I used several fake accounts to get the ridiculous referral bonuses. I spent maybe a dozen hours to get several hundred million in-game tokens. In terms of real tokens that amounted to pennies. So for me it's not a big loss of time, but I can understand how so many people feel scammed. As I said though, if you respect yourself don't chase airdrops that much.

Persist until it becomes trash, the price continues to plummet as happened to the Dogs meme coin which experienced a decline. This is an example that investing in meme coins is full of high risks. It feels lazy to go back to playing the tap tap screen game, maybe this is the end of this trend because of the many disappointments

I wouldn't say they don't give you - anything - back, rather, people expected much more from such a big project in the tap-tap sector, thus, when they got their $5-$10, they were disappointed or enraged, in some cases.
Some people with big bags of it would believe in it, others - they would just sell their little funds which they've got and move on.

Hype always works for these airdrops just because of this usually experienced people spend more on marketing as they are able to have the good number of users which can jump, and they are able to have the enough number of members in these airdrops which usually ended on bad note for the peoples those spend their good time and at the end they are having nothing with crying for waste of time is always give nothing but still we are not taking our lessons.

Usually teams use different strategies as they understand this is free money and members can't do anything about this even they are having some good media noise, but it's not problem for them while they are now going through with their own strategy which they feel better for them and their project.

I read on different platforms too many peoples are feeling not good and giving their views about this cheat which done by team because this is completely wrong thing done by them, and they have to face consequences for this as well, but now things are already gone and members are feeling different about this project which was hype too much in start.

yeah, it disappointed a lot of new crypto users, and maybe they deserved it in a way.

About 90% (or maybe even more) are definitely disappointed. The token is being currently traded, but the price is super low. Still, I think a few holders will stick around, hoping the price goes up eventually.

Hamster Kombat making hundreds of millions of dollars from its huge community and giving nothing back feels like a real scam.

I just checked the price on CoinMarketCap, and it's no surprise it keeps dropping. But who’s still hoping that the full launch will boost its value?

I am one of them, but it's not because they airdropped disappointedly. It's probably the project with the highest number of early participants ever. This has automatically ridiculed it and it's normal.

Next season? Well, you must be one of the ardent supporters, good luck to you. As for the airdrop amount, there is no way they can enrich that huge number of participants greatly, it's you guys who have to understand how this thing works.

The size matters here, so don't compare it with the past ones like $NOT etc. But know that it's all a referral program and they are feeding fatter with your referees. For this, while some of you earned $5, the least of them may go home with $10m, it's all brain.

Actually I never expected Hamster Combat to give people such small amount of tokens they gave.  They attracted so much at first that people acted on the attraction.  They have achieved so much success in this project that success has not been created in any other project.  However, it was not right for them to cheat.  I worked and got only 165 tokens which have no value.  I don't think it makes much sense to leave this coin for the future.  Especially the Tap Tap project may achieve more success but may not sustain its existence in the market for long.  In the past few projects we have seen that their market position has not gone up and all the projects have gone down in price.  So I mean keeping this coin for future will not be very reasonable and not much returns.

Well there was alot of hype for this airdrop and we did not get big profits from it. There was alot of high expectations so now we are not happy with how it happened.
But we can not think the airdrops is the same way that it was a longer time ago. It is different now and I thought we would make some profit from this one. But it was just another airdrop like rest of them all. Even if you did get 2000 tokens it is not big profits.

Whenever there's freebies people will always flock, that is the rule, the airdrop that actually make so much this bullrun around are the airdrop with undisclosed requirement that caught majority of people off guard, $ZK with their liquidity provision as the most important multiplier, and EIGEN with their equal distribution to all the participant limiting the whales from getting all the allocation.

but aside from that, TON hype is fading, less and less liquidity going into TON project, HMSTR and CATI don't get that massive rally that NOT is getting, much the same is DOGS, the pattern shows and we're probably at the late stage of TON hype, so expect things to get worse from here.

I don't think that all these numbers in the Hamster communities are more interested in playing than in making huge profits, and the truth is that the game does not seem entertaining and it is like other games that you click on the screen until your finger turns red, and In reality, is that they did not promise exaggerated profits for the airdrop, and I agree with you that the only the players are the ones who raised their expectations too high through the 'click to earn' concept promoted by these games.

Maybe $20 for the time wasted is really little, but even if it is not satisfactory to them, they may have been lucky enough to earn some money, as others had their accounts banned and received nothing. These games on Telegram are not a means to get rich, nor do they promise much. It’s just an airdrop that might get you some decent profits, or you might get a low airdrop, or the airdrop claim fees might be higher than the value of its tokens.

The time spent on the airdrop is not worth the value and have always said this should not be strange to people because that is token for you . There are some projects after spending much time in participating on airdrop it is still not listed in the market. For me the hamster airdrop is not worth the time. Like someone who was able to mine 4000000 ph at the end it was just nothing.

I should have traded my Hamster on the first day it was listed on exchange; I waited for it to get listed in our local exchange, so the value went down by 20% and it will continue to go down, Why? because there's a loss of confidence from the platform because of disappointment from the distribution.

Now that they announce the roadmap, and that includes the burning features and mechanism, I'm curious if it will have an impact on the interest of the community, From all the indications I saw, Hamster will be another shitcoin in the making.

Alot of airdrop hunters have been be disappointed by the outcome of the hamster project although I did not do the airdrop or play the games because I already know from the hype that Hamster is not going to be the best among them, we had a few of those coins that did become very successful in the market and rewarded their participants in a good way, such as dogcoins and notcoins.

But all the others projects coming up this day's are just following the hype without any plans to give back to the community that support them all through the development and testing stage of the project which will result into more crisis when their will fail to rewards they promoters who are the airdrop guy's.

Sometimes it is better not to jump on all this projects and in as much as some Fork's will be looking for free money, there still need to check the integrity of those projects and also the team behind them to avoid Falling into the wrong hands.

Well, if we look at it from the outside, Hamster Kombat looks like an airdrop project that will really succeed. In fact, I myself worked on the task for about 2 months and only got about $ 1 more for the current price. Well, it's a shame that many people are disappointed. When we see that the hamster's YouTube channel has tens of millions of subscribers, it makes me think that they have even made a lot of profit from their channel. However, this is the risk of following an airdrop. I think, personally I felt I had high hopes for this project, and when the results came out, I was also disappointed.

The distribution is so disappointing that the developers have to do something because their token is losing value and volume so they immediately announced their roadmap and plans in 2025. They will do buy and burning of supply, and they have a lot of new features coming to increase demand for their token.

They said that they will keep user engaged even after the airdrop but its going to be a long wait and with more good airdrops coming people will just leave Hamster for project with good potential and profit.

I too think it will be to no avail, basically.
Expectations shouldn't be too high with HK in the first place.
With the fact that they change some criteria on a whim, it will be no wonder to see this same drop but with a "Part Two!" sticker on it.

Exploiting the not actually so very interested after-all users for the benefit of the actually-interested can be a useful game-mechanic for sure.

However the implementation referenced above in effect exploits the so very uninterested that they put undervalued "skin" into the game;

The potential of a better "negotiable" payout per actually-interested player can probably be increased by getting a more "negotiable" form of "skin" out of the uninterested.

Nonetheless it does seem that the telegram click-games have noticed that to the extent of making the "hoops" the uninterested need to "jump through" be more "negotiable" than might in the past have been the more usual case.

In the Galactic Milieu's most actively botted "rabbit-hole" we already long ago pre-empted that development stage, jumping directly to "this part ain't free to enter" up front by using one-year subscription player-accounts and pricing them at prices intended to make it take about half a year (at least in first year when first setting up "businesses") to reach break-even, thus leaving "extra" skin input by those who fail to play long enough to break even as potential extra earnings for those who do actually play...


-MarkM-

Those who got surprised are newbies; many of them have Hamster as their first airdrop, This is a big disappointment after the success of Notcoin and Dogs Many thought that Hamster is going to sustain the good run of Telegram based airdrop, but its success of gaining a lot of participants causes a lot of negative issues you cannot promise a good price for millions of participants based on many metrics like supply.


I was hopeful but not expecting anything great, With over 50 million in a hurry to accumulate as much as they can, they can only give what they can based on their sustainability, I just wonder what's the formula they've used to give 1000 HMSTR for those with millions of points, I read that they laid out their roadmap maybe to quench the participants' anger and frustration, trying to make them believe that what they are holding right now will be valuable in the future.

Both $CATI and $HMSTR are according to me the worst airdrops ever I have participated in. I always felt that my understanding of good airdrops was far better than everyone else here as I was part of ICP airdrop which paid me a good amount every month for 12 months. I made a good amount from the $DOGS airdrop which was in three figures but these two have not been the best I have as they remind me of my early days when I used to work hard for airdrops that were in the value of two figures. I am sure that the end of T2E airdrops has already started as they are not able to deliver what is expected from them.

If there is another word that will look more harsh than worst then you should have used it because Hamster combat is the worst airdrop I have ever seen so far though it maybe better than not listing at all but the price was almost equivalent to nothing. A friend of mine, after having over 5 million PPH the money he was seeing was not encouraging so he decided to leave the coin for sometime but this is memecoin, are we sure if this hamster combat will pump again. And me personally I don't think I will participate in the season 2 of hamster combat though I was not actually surprise with the listing price because this is airdrop anything is possible.

Just wanna give some insight that hamster's market cap is actually the same as catizen at initial listing



so what makes CATI yields better than hamster? the reason is, cati rewards paid user more than the free user, even going as far as making it the multiplier for the final reward.
HMSTR choose different path of distributing the token across their participant without any special multiplier so as a result, the reward is diluted.

It's arguably not the worst airdrop, but it's definitely among the lower tier project for the airdrop, they try to please everyone but instead the final reward angers everyone.

If I were you, I'd sell them but that's just me. So, good luck if you have decided to keep it for the next seasons to come.

I have a friend that have been tapping that hamster for several months. He didn't stopped but he just got a few. He has nothing to say and just accepted that this is how airdrop goes. Sometimes you're lucky and fortunate and sometimes not. Just be grateful that you've received still something freely.

Yes, HK is nothing. Dogs is better.

Yes i do. And it's not only hamster, but i think the era for all of tap tap airdrop is almost coming to its end. They are on the major exchanges, but their prices disappoint. And i mention some tap tap tokens other than hamster below.

Catizen (I got a decent reward from this cuz i spent lots of money)



DOGs



It seems we're getting even closer to the bubble burst of the telegram airdrop. It's not even worth trying that. Wasted several months to get a few USD. We can do better with our time to earn more than that.

Next time you talk with them, ask them why they expected more. That is the real question right there, they got paid about 20 bucks, for spending zero money, and just playing a game. Isn't that enough? How many games are out there that you can spend zero dollars on, and then make 20 dollars just for playing the game?

There aren't that many games available for something like that, it's unique in that sense. So, ask your friend why they expected a lot more money, why expected hundreds, even thousands to be paid to them just for playing a game on their phone? That is the real question and I think it is definitely something that is all their problem, not problem with the project, they were wrong to expect so much money to play a game.

As in other topic I said, for me was a little comedy, my 3900 HMSTR was like 30$.
With such momentum, marketing and, most importantly, time spent e.g. on collected keys, everyone expected something wow, but as we know, crypto sometimes surprises positively and sometimes negatively.

Airdrops can be a frustrating experience if the number of tokens awarded does not match expectations or the value is not significant. Some projects may use airdrops to attract community attention without providing substantial incentives. Even after a token is listed on an exchange, some token airdrops can have low liquidity or not grow in value as expected. However, holding tokens for the long term can be a good strategy if you believe the project has potential in the future. Often, tokens that seem worthless at first can gain momentum in the market as the project begins to grow and develop a strong use case.

Some friends who consistently chase the Hamster kombat airdrop only got 2000 tokens and he said this was the worst airdrop, so I would say so even though I didn't get more tokens because I already knew that with a lot of users, the tokens would definitely be small.

There are calls for a “boycott” of Hamster Kombat because they think this is the worst airdrop, I know the community is disappointed but they also have to accept the reality of their overblown expectations.

After the listing of this token immediately dropped, it was different when Dogs although it had dropped but rose again, but Hamster Kombat dropped more sharply, or maybe many threw away their tokens because they felt disappointed.

How many of you here feel this airdrop was one of the worst? As of now they got listed their token on multiple exchanges. Whereas the airdrop token were so less to determine that they used the community with the perks of getting the best out of their airdrop but they did not. I have got somewhat decent amount of token which I felt should be kept for for the next season.

Whereas some of my friends who joined later have tokens which are worth nothing. This is not what I expected as this kind of airdrop was once used in the past. I doubt my referrals will continue in the second season.

Do you think the same as I do now after listing?