Oh haha, I totally missed the fact that OP was given red trust by Alex_Sr for being an account farmer.
That explains the completely nonsense accusation with no evidence whatsoever. Good to see that all OP has achieved is making things worse for himself. These idiots never learn.
Topic: Abuse of a system of encouragement (merit) (Read 338 times)
~S~
Thanks for this thread, whilst it is a load of horseshit it has bought your account to my attention - I have tagged you as well now.
have a great day.
The user of Alex_Sr (https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/alexsr-1762404 ) participates in encouragement of senseless posts. The participants who received from Alex_Sr merit are noticed in farming accounts and merit abuse. <…>
DdmrDdmr https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/ddmrddmr-1582324
<…>
Yes, I must indeed confess to having a small farm account, consisting of precisely two accounts: DdmrDdmr and DdmrDdmr_alt. DdmrDdmr https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/ddmrddmr-1582324
<…>
The former is the one I groom, feeding it with regular eloquent posts; a harsh task that has been going on for just over a year now, and that consumes a large part of my spare time. It springs some weird fruits called Merits and sMerits. Merits I collect and keep, and they sometimes are seen as a cool thing and are sometimes compared by some in size and shape. They do seem pretty worthless though in practical terms, and they do bare a strange resemblance to the Dutch tulip bulbs.
sMerits I tend to give away as fairly as I can. They don’t seem to be very useful personally, so I might as well hand them around to those that I encounter along my travels and seem decent enough per my criteria.
The latter, DdmrDdmr_alt, I tend to forget about. It’s a rather condemned account which I have never fed it a single post yet, and thus it bears none of the above mentioned fruit. I’ve given control over it to my friendly K9, Scraper, who plays around with it and probably just pisses on the bark of the tree (no pun intended).
On a serious note: just fuckoff (may have plagiarized Tman there).
Its funny he demands proof but gives negativ feedback based on assumption.
Seems legit
Seems legit
Of the accounts you've linked, most of them are within the top 250 merit receivers of all time (including DdmrDdmr who is number 2), so if Alex_Sr is guilty then so are about 100 other people who merit these accounts. Two of the accounts you've listed (inhoneer and Akond) haven't received a single merit from Alex_Sr ever.
I'm not entirely sure what you are trying to prove here?
I'm not entirely sure what you are trying to prove here?
Posts garbage.
http://images.vfl.ru/ii/1548026659/5e03cd14/25039025_m.png
There is nothing wrong with those posts or those merits. The screenshots you posted in the OP are equally meaningless.
You previously claimed that without definition (ie criteria) good post bad post is meaningless. Hence claiming merit scores are meaningless full stop.
Of the accounts you've linked, most of them are within the top 250 merit receivers of all time (including DdmrDdmr who is number 2), so if Alex_Sr is guilty then so are about 100 other people who merit these accounts. Two of the accounts you've listed (inhoneer and Akond) haven't received a single merit from Alex_Sr ever.
I'm not entirely sure what you are trying to prove here?
I'm not entirely sure what you are trying to prove here?
Posts garbage.
http://images.vfl.ru/ii/1548026659/5e03cd14/25039025_m.png
There is nothing wrong with those posts or those merits. The screenshots you posted in the OP are equally meaningless.
Of the accounts you've linked, most of them are within the top 250 merit receivers of all time (including DdmrDdmr who is number 2), so if Alex_Sr is guilty then so are about 100 other people who merit these accounts. Two of the accounts you've listed (inhoneer and Akond) haven't received a single merit from Alex_Sr ever.
I'm not entirely sure what you are trying to prove here?
I'm not entirely sure what you are trying to prove here?
Posts garbage.
-Nikisa 232nd most merited received 57 merits from Alex_Sr out of 173 total received merits.
-Coin-1 152nd most merited received 10 merits from Alex_Sr out of 248 total received merits.
-Chimk 203rd most merited received 10 merits from Alex_Sr out of 192 total received merits.
-esmanthra 76th most merited received 12 merits from Alex_Sr out of 396 total received merits.
-DdmrDdmr 2nd most merited received =<4 merits from Alex_Sr out of 1643 total received merits.
-DabLjat >1000 most merited received 5 merits from Alex_Sr out of 32 total received merits.
-imhoneer 561st most merited received =<1 merits from Alex_Sr out of 90 total received merits.
-Akond >1000 most merited received 0 merits from Alex_Sr out of 14 total received merits.
Are you sure you are talking about Alex_Sr?
All data from: bpip.org
-Coin-1 152nd most merited received 10 merits from Alex_Sr out of 248 total received merits.
-Chimk 203rd most merited received 10 merits from Alex_Sr out of 192 total received merits.
-esmanthra 76th most merited received 12 merits from Alex_Sr out of 396 total received merits.
-DdmrDdmr 2nd most merited received =<4 merits from Alex_Sr out of 1643 total received merits.
-DabLjat >1000 most merited received 5 merits from Alex_Sr out of 32 total received merits.
-imhoneer 561st most merited received =<1 merits from Alex_Sr out of 90 total received merits.
-Akond >1000 most merited received 0 merits from Alex_Sr out of 14 total received merits.
Are you sure you are talking about Alex_Sr?
All data from: bpip.org
What's the Quickseller gambit? Pawn to f3?
I think it's more like throwing pawns at the opponent and flipping the board (I might be confusing this with the pigeon chess rules though).
I'm not entirely sure what you are trying to prove here?
Could be a variation of the Quickseller gambit. Put out a ludicrous accusation or two or a dozen with a few burner accounts. Regardless of the outcome, six months later you can reference them like so: "people have been saying for a long time that X, Y, and Z are involved in shady activities".
Or just a butthurt account farmer who suddenly became red due to Alex_Sr's return to DT2.
What's the Quickseller gambit? Pawn to f3?
I'm not entirely sure what you are trying to prove here?
Could be a variation of the Quickseller gambit. Put out a ludicrous accusation or two or a dozen with a few burner accounts. Regardless of the outcome, six months later you can reference them like so: "people have been saying for a long time that X, Y, and Z are involved in shady activities".
Or just a butthurt account farmer who suddenly became red due to Alex_Sr's return to DT2.
Of the accounts you've linked, most of them are within the top 250 merit receivers of all time (including DdmrDdmr who is number 2), so if Alex_Sr is guilty then so are about 100 other people who merit these accounts. Two of the accounts you've listed (inhoneer and Akond) haven't received a single merit from Alex_Sr ever.
I'm not entirely sure what you are trying to prove here?
I'm not entirely sure what you are trying to prove here?
Alex_Sr is not in DT1. You linked to some user profiles. Where is the abuse? And move this to Reputation please.
Users merit which received from it are noticed in farming accounts and merit abuse. (forgive for my English)Which you provided zero evidence of, again. Merely sending merits or receiving merits can't be a proof of anything. If you want to be taken seriously you need to prove first that the users listed are involved in "farming accounts" and then you need to prove that Alex_Sr is involved in it besides sending merits to them. I'm sure I've sent merits to some of those users. Do you want to accuse me of something?
You still haven't moved the thread.
Alex_Sr is not in DT1. You linked to some user profiles. Where is the abuse? And move this to Reputation please.
My guilt is not proved in any way. There is no communication.Users merit which received from it are noticed in farming accounts and merit abuse. (forgive for my English)
Alex_Sr is not in DT1. You linked to some user profiles. Where is the abuse? And move this to Reputation please.
The
Jump to: