Author

Topic: Accuracy of GPU performance measures (Read 1448 times)

newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
May 24, 2011, 01:16:30 PM
#5
Chalk it up to ATI's confusing naming scheme. 6870 is a weaker card than 5870, also I think miners are not yet optimized for 6XXX.

A rig with two 5970 is very solid if you can find some. If you want to add to an existing machine, a 5870 is good.
more likely not "miners not optimised", but 69xx less suitable for GPGPU usage and bit more suitable for gaming thanks to improved ROP's and memory size/speed.
google [questionably reasonable]difference between VLIW5 [58x0 GPU's]and VLIW4 [69xx GPU's].
donator
Activity: 2058
Merit: 1054
May 24, 2011, 08:23:47 AM
#4
Chalk it up to ATI's confusing naming scheme. 6870 is a weaker card than 5870, also I think miners are not yet optimized for 6XXX.

A rig with two 5970 is very solid if you can find some. If you want to add to an existing machine, a 5870 is good.
kjj
legendary
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1026
May 24, 2011, 08:14:33 AM
#3
Is it really that hard to make a spreadsheet to calculate hashing power per dollar?
newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
May 24, 2011, 08:03:34 AM
#2
Ati: from 5850 to 6990. some was use even 5830 and 48xx, but thats not so reasonable.
sr. member
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
May 24, 2011, 07:57:47 AM
#1
Hi guys,

I'm new to all things mining and abandoned the idea back when we were below $2.00

What I don't understand is why according to the BitCoin wiki the hash rate is going down with new GPUs. ( https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Mining_Hardware_Comparison )

Basically what is the most cost effective GPU to buy these days based only on cost of equipment?

Jump to: