I have discovered some nice project admin, one will like to work with them, they take their time to respond to you as each person is important to them, likewise, I have noticed from the responses and interaction of some project manager and bounty admin some hash responses, sometimes they may react to your messages as if you had issues before, and this should not be, they act like we have enough people who likes our project. We know some members may also be provoking but not all. In the same vein. Should admin too be so temperamental?
I think you are referring to Bounties and signature campaigns managers here on bitcointalk. If a bounty / Signature manager declines our application or do not accept us for any reason, we consider him as harsh. Also it is not possible for them to keep thier kool when they get bombardments of msgs and PMs to get into the campaign.
I'm saddened by the fact that the sig campaigns and bounty threads are continuing to take over Bitcoin Talk. I suspect that this is one of the reasons that I don't post as much these days. Would it be possible to keep all these topics, and the campaign effluent, in the underworld here? Bitcoin seems to be at a really exciting and interesting point in its growth, and I feel that this should be the main focus of the form - together with some of the reputable altcoins of course.
I'm afraid but we have to find out our interest our self in this forum. To get interesting valuable information about bitcoin & altcoin we have dedicated threads like Bitcoin discussion and altcoin discussion but these are considered as spam mega threads and we have to get our way through them to find some useful information.
