I'm superficial in my thinking and can't see past my own nose.
I will attempt one more time and I'll do it by quoting from that letter
More troubling still, institutional leaders, in a spirit of panicked damage control, are delivering hasty and disproportionate punishments instead of considered reforms. Editors are fired for running controversial pieces; books are withdrawn for alleged inauthenticity; journalists are barred from writing on certain topics; professors are investigated for quoting works of literature in class; a researcher is fired for circulating a peer-reviewed academic study; and the heads of organizations are ousted for what are sometimes just clumsy mistakes.
The real threat to freedom of speech is not about youtube videos or social media. Those are just the outward symptoms of what is going on in the institutions of society.
your posts also highlighted things about people editing quote to make it seem like hitler was a trans-phobe and other books about white supremacy. bla blah blah
ok i get it. you are crying that certain things are being surpressed.
ok i get it you want to shout for the sake of shouting because you have examples of how in history people were made to shut up and people were not given the platform/microphone they wanted
you do know that just because you have a typewriter does not then mean your auto awarded a book publishing deal or a job at a news paper
just be cause your a newspaper writer. doesnt mean not matter what you say it should be automatically be printed.
just because you wrote a theory. doesnt mean you automatically deserve it being peer reviewed
..
(modern version) just because you have a webcam doesnt mean your videos then deserve to be on youtube
the 'cancel culture' is a millenial buzzword and is very much about social media of millenials thinking they deserve and think its a right to have stupid videos published and watched by billions by default
..
but what is more important is not arguing about the platform or microphone method of getting a message out being the problem. but instead the actual message involved.
i see too many people who are just highlighting this 'advocating for free speach' but when asking them what important message do you have they just say 'no one can hear me speak'
circling an endless and meaninless campaign of crying.
so forget arguing about past stuff.. time travel is impossible. so dont waste the present time on the past.
if you have a REAL message.
dont think you auto deserve a platform to voice it.
dont cry that your not having access to such platforms
instead actually understand the message you want to make and then actually go and do something.
for instance. talk to politicians direct. dont b*tch about them on blogs/forums about how they are not listening or viewing you blog. actually talk to them
dont be ambiguous, dont talk to those just about 'speaking'/'being heard' problems in society
instead get right to the matter
is it racism, homophobia, education. PICK ONE
by being too broad, trying to talk about books and social media and peer reviews. all your just doing is crying that certain times peoples idea's are not becoming famous.
but your not addressing the idea itself of each example.
all you are doing is trying to sound like you want the world to have free access to bookdeals/ free conference stage time. free access to social media.
and politics knows thats a NON-government business for profit thing. so nothing to do with them
if book companies or stores want to recall a product. they can. if a conference wants to cancel a speaker and invite someone else up to the mic. they can.
so dont waste time on the platform blame drama.
instead find out WHAT THE MESSAGE/IDEA/THEORY IS and if it contains solutions and actually knows the causes of problems and it actually knows who it should target to get change. then use different ways of getting the message out.
again. dont just cry that a message is not being heard because a certain platform removed it.
if a book is recalled. turn it into a movie/documentary/podcast and use a different method/platform
if its a news item. then work out who the news concerns. and direct messages at them.
but if its just about getting viewcounts/readers just for the sake of notoriety of being seen/read. then your wasting your time.
dont get me wrong..
i understand that capitalism is powerful and these book publishers decide who they let publish
the capitalism of news media only wanting fluff pieces that pander to their elite friends.
peer reviews that pander to getting grants and notoriety, but real invention/innovation gets locked up in patents and NDA's
i do get it and i dislike it too.
but if your only message is how the capitalist/elitests are not letting you use their business platform. you really are missing the point.
liberalism is not about reliance on capitalists as a stage/platform.
liberalism/libertarians are self sufficient and find their own path. do things for themselves
they dont want reliance on others or asking permission.
so find a real message/idea/innovation/problem(and solution) and actually act on it more direct.
not complain or cry that others are not supporting your idea and not making it auto famous