Why did you rely on suspicious platforms "HitBTC" and did not rely on many popular platforms like Binance?
Why are developers' images confused even though you show their pictures and names?
Thanks for the question and sorry for late response!
1. Regarding statistical data - hard to tell because results depend on the user input, especially how he/she changes the risk level. Acai is the tool for optimization of profit to risk ratio & saving time. Anyway, here's the newest backtest:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EN4KDFPWkAEaOQ2?format=png&name=large
Some stats for the High Risk strategy:
- Based on HitBTC using 1min close prices of BTC/USDT
- Timeframe: 12.06.2019-05.01.2020
- Number of transactions: 863
- Number of transactions per Month: 127.83
- Mean capital involvment: 81.78[%]
- Profit per transaction after 0.07% transaction fee: 0.04[%]
- Profit per Month: 4.56[%]
- Profit: 30.77[%]
- Calmar score: 0.76167 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calmar_ratio)
2. Why HitBTC? There are two reasons, really. First, HitBTC provides stable API with good historical data for learning our models and we have used it for months so we have some trust. Second, we have used HitBTC personally in the past so it was our first choice for Acai. Third, their support is responsive and helpful.
We are going to release Acai for Binance in the following months (we built some infrastructure for Binance but now we're 100% focused on launch on HitBTC, it may become priority if we see there huge demand.
3. Our images aren't "confused". They may be blurred because they are still loading - Wix, our website provider is unfortunately very slow. We are working on it. You can see us clearly on our LinkedIn profiles
If anything is unclear, please ask more questions. I'm more than happy to answer!
Jan from Acai, co-founder and COO