Could you please expand on their involvements?
this sounds awesome so far.
Yeah, we are really happy with the range of skilled industry experts who were willing to review this white paper. Alex wrote the first iteration of the paper and we shared an advanced copy with the mentioned list of cryptographers requesting peer review of the methods viability before we publicly published the paper. Each reviewers specific level of engagement was dependent on how much time they were able to spare around their existing projects, but everyone listed read the paper and provided us with constructive feedback which we integrated into the published version.
As stated in the acknowledgement section, their review should not be considered an endorsement or indicate liability, and they were providing feedback voluntarily (non commercially) in a cooperative manner.
We are humbled that so many of our esteemed industry peers were willing to spare their time and energy to review this white paper.