Topic: Algorithm "Proof of your transaction" (Read 146 times)

Cryptocurrencies can save, populizirovat and make really decentralized introduction (along with the commission) of the priority right to each doing the transaction to calculate the hash of its block in the p2p pool with other users whose transactions are included in this block independently.
Each user of cryptocurrency should have the right to calculate the hash of its transactions with its own capacities (both to provide capacity in advance, as if to accumulate settlements for future transactions, and after sending money).
This would make the network really decentralized and would involve huge idle distributed power in the calculations, which would make it possible not to increase the complexity, it would be obvious that they are calculating really different devices, and in fact for carrying out their own transaction. T e the right to calculate the share of the hash of your transaction in the block should be a priority before paying the commission.
Or, for example, if you keep an open node for some time, you can also save for a transaction.
How much can you tolerate this chaos and the dominance of Asiki? We must demand a refinement of the mechanism.
- The main mistake of the blockchain and all sorts of crypts on it is the deprivation of the opportunity to mine everybody at least a little bit, even if it’s just when the wallet is turned on. There should have been a limit on the power of mining (maintaining hash) by one user. Then there would be no need to increase the complexity, and the protection would be of the same high impenetrable level. The cost of maintaining the system does not have to be disproportionately high, ideally, the ideal system would have to work stably on the world’s equipment that people already have. There’s enough all the resources of all users when they idle for a while. Then it is cost-effective. And the unprofitable system will collapse in any way.
Now Bitcoin simply decided to ignore a huge amount of idle power, which was indeed distributed, but devoted itself to centralized power, against the logic of its main postulate. This already suggests that it was cleaned one way or another.
- the second major mistake (or intentionally) is to allow any non-p2pol and stock exchanges with unlimited commissions and the possibility of fraud. Mining should have remained only solo (albeit for a little bit) or a common single distributed pool of currency.
Let's achieve this and make cryptocurrencies a real working tool, independent, and decentralized.
This can be implemented as a separate currency for transactions of any other currencies, for example.
And this is the only way to maintain decentralization. The purse should offer the primary right to remember for its transaction on the most low complexity without making any profit, and only the second option to pay a commission to miners of profits to recipients.
Increasing the complexity (difficulty) of mining allows you to restrain users, not allowing them to receive coins in unlimited quantities.
And if you need to mine only your transaction, then there will be no rush and there is no need to increase the complexity. There will be a surplus of miners. Coins in general can not be mined, it's just a bone thrown such. The value of the blockchain is not in the "mining" of some kind of currency, but in the sequence of records with keys that cannot be changed. Coins themselves in general could immediately create everything and everyone (as does the state). Real work is needed to the extent necessary to create the keys of the transaction chain and store the blockchain archive. That's all. This is what you have to pay for. Really free miners are needed only in case (and so on) if someone urgently wants to make transactions, but there is no computational power at hand to search for the key and to include entries in the general blockchain. That's when they can turn to free miners, exactly in the amount of calculations that is necessary and sufficient to maintain the system.
Mining in the understanding of the average person is simple (as he was presented) was needed only to somehow distribute the money. They could just be scattered to people in principle, equally to all, and that would be more correct, and people would just start paying them, by mailing the keys for the blocks of their transactions.
The main principle - "Proof of your transaction" - mining only for the sake of a transaction (no more)