Why is there such a concept in society, if the leader (no matter which society or group) is a bad person, then everyone who is with him or under him is the same. Why is it that if a person is bad and they start treating him badly, the same attitude automatically relates to his subordinates, because they are not him. How to avoid humiliation in the social sphere if you are good and your boss is bad?
This is called justification because you are justifying a group of people is the one person's crime and the one person's kind of character so I believe it was an ancient time when all this is is it not in the present era because you must make some enquiries asbestos the next some research to know someone with commitment or the person before you will come in conclusion why does define the person so I don't think that this particular point of yours is still in existence again 
Topic: All bad - like the main one? (Read 224 times)
Leader is the first foundation. if the leader is bad, then automatically everything is bad. therefore, when choosing leaders we must be careful 🙂.
Yes, that's just how you can't immediately understand which leader. And if they pay well in this company, then apparently they will have to endure. There is an expression "the fish rots from the head", therefore, it is not necessary to equalize everyone under one person, but little is understood this way, so if the boss is bad, then everyone under his leadership is like that, because they cannot object to him.
in this particular statement I stand to be against you because you cannot justify whoever or condemn everyone because of one person every living creature have its own characteristics so since they are under someone that does not mean that they will hear it the characteristics of the person when they depart from the person you will see the real character of that particular person so I think that that definition is very wrong from my own understanding 
In the US, there is law that states that if a government official doesn't follow the tenets of the Constitution and law, he is not acting as the government official that he holds the office of. He is not to be obeyed.
Biden doesn't have an affidavit of his oath of office on file, as required by law. Neither do the members of his cabinet. So, they are not the President and the cabinet of the US President.
Time to start suing government people who obey their orders.
Biden doesn't have an affidavit of his oath of office on file, as required by law. Neither do the members of his cabinet. So, they are not the President and the cabinet of the US President.
Time to start suing government people who obey their orders.
A good man wouldn't be under the umbrella of a bad leader because good and bad are two opposite things and they can never dine together. If a leader in an organization is evil and the workers are with him,what do you think will happen,he will influence his workers with his evil way of life and if there is a good man working with him,he will not like the way his leader does things and might end up quitting his job to avoid having a bad name.
Leaders can easily influence their workers in any organization because so many people will be scared to tell him about his evil deeds so that they will not get fired. Good name is better than riches,a bad leader will bring bad name to his organization and the workers because they are both birds of the same feather. Life is all about choice and if someone is working for a bad leader,he can likely be good but it will be difficult for him to survive in such environment because,he will gradually change to bad or he will leave his Boss due to his Boss way of life.
Leaders can easily influence their workers in any organization because so many people will be scared to tell him about his evil deeds so that they will not get fired. Good name is better than riches,a bad leader will bring bad name to his organization and the workers because they are both birds of the same feather. Life is all about choice and if someone is working for a bad leader,he can likely be good but it will be difficult for him to survive in such environment because,he will gradually change to bad or he will leave his Boss due to his Boss way of life.
A bad boss doesn't mean you're bad, it's probably a prejudice. If they look at you askance, maybe it's not the boss but you?
Just like oil and water, good and bad don't mix well. That is why when the leader is bad, most of the people already expect that the team members are also bad since the good members won't last or stay good for long. They either get detached from the team or get influenced by the majority and then turn into something bad as well. The same goes for the teams that have good leaders. Which is why we always need to be mindful of the people we surround ourselves with because we can only end up getting isolated or getting influenced if we choose the wrong company.
But there will always be a way out through a separation techniques that will distinguish the food from the bad, the shaft from the grain, it may take a little more longer for the process to be achieved but it's not going to be denied, bad people are everywhere, you can find out that it's the leaders that are bad in some situations while the peopleay be the ones being bad in another settings but our stand being upright will judge right and vindicate us if we did not join them in doing the right things the wrong way, because there's always a recompense to everything we do in life.
I know you are trying to be positive but if you read my response to OP again, you will see that my main point is that if a person that is good or bad is placed on a group of people that are of the opposite attitude/personality, that person will inevitably be alienated or influenced by the group. Which is why most people tend to judge others depending on the type of people they surround themselves with.
The leader is the head of everything that happens. It depends on his instructions how the others will behave further. They are most often, but if the boss is very bad and you feel the views of others, it is better to leave such a job.
Just like oil and water, good and bad don't mix well. That is why when the leader is bad, most of the people already expect that the team members are also bad since the good members won't last or stay good for long. They either get detached from the team or get influenced by the majority and then turn into something bad as well. The same goes for the teams that have good leaders. Which is why we always need to be mindful of the people we surround ourselves with because we can only end up getting isolated or getting influenced if we choose the wrong company.
But there will always be a way out through a separation techniques that will distinguish the food from the bad, the shaft from the grain, it may take a little more longer for the process to be achieved but it's not going to be denied, bad people are everywhere, you can find out that it's the leaders that are bad in some situations while the peopleay be the ones being bad in another settings but our stand being upright will judge right and vindicate us if we did not join them in doing the right things the wrong way, because there's always a recompense to everything we do in life.
Just like oil and water, good and bad don't mix well. That is why when the leader is bad, most of the people already expect that the team members are also bad since the good members won't last or stay good for long. They either get detached from the team or get influenced by the majority and then turn into something bad as well. The same goes for the teams that have good leaders. Which is why we always need to be mindful of the people we surround ourselves with because we can only end up getting isolated or getting influenced if we choose the wrong company.
It's like from the flocks just as the animals, it's like an instinct wherein whatever the others do to the others, we'll just go ahead and follow what does the flocks do to them.
People of the same character usually roll together and normally for you to be under someone and be loyal to them as your leader you must share some characteristics with them or agree to some of their ideologies.
That's right, if a leader is being treated well and then you're seeing people respecting him. You want to get respected as well so, you'll just do what he's doing and that's why you'll also earn the respect that he's earning. It was like being a role model just as parents to kids and vice versa. We do have a point of view where it differs from person to person depending on the culture where we're living. And in this society, if people have been treating someone badly, there's a reason for it. For that, the person should realize and understand that there's something wrong with him and not the society but it can also be the opposite wherein that view has been passed on from person to person even without defending the badly treated person and these people have just relied on hearsays.
Why is there such a concept in society, if the leader (no matter which society or group) is a bad person, then everyone who is with him or under him is the same.
People of the same character usually roll together and normally for you to be under someone and be loyal to them as your leader you must share some characteristics with them or agree to some of their ideologies. Why is it that if a person is bad and they start treating him badly, the same attitude automatically relates to his subordinates, because they are not him. How to avoid humiliation in the social sphere if you are good and your boss is bad?
This is transferring of aggression, if you support a bad person, people automatically will not like you because of your choice.
Being good or bad is not by saying it with mouth, we see it from their kind of lifestyle, some say that they are very dreadful but you discover that it's just an empty threat and some that also profess being good are the ones very worst to trust their characters as to how far they can be so desperate in doing wicked things underneath, we cannot know ourselves completely not to talk about knowing others and their way of life.
Leader is the first foundation. if the leader is bad, then automatically everything is bad.
I don't agree with this precept as the follower has the choice to choose between being right or tow same wrong and ugly road as the leader. Just because a leader is bad doesn't implies that the subject should all follow same road. In life we all have a volition to act in every way we want, the consequences that's follows is what matters as some decisdes to follow the bad path as the leader due to why they may ceased from enjoying should they express a constraint against such nbad act about the said leader while other damn every consequences and decisdes to follow the good path in life irrespective of whatever consequence that might follow.
Why is there such a concept in society, if the leader (no matter which society or group) is a bad person, then everyone who is with him or under him is the same. Why is it that if a person is bad and they start treating him badly, the same attitude automatically relates to his subordinates, because they are not him? How to avoid humiliation in the social sphere if you are good and your boss is bad?
The answer is simple, because the leader controls the rest member of his team and due to fear of the leader, even if the leader is not right in his idea or directives, the followers have no option but to follow suit and when there is any mistake the whole team will be blamed for that, but in a political setting, even when the team fails, it is the leader who will be called out for that and that alone is enough to suggest and point to how weak our political institutions have become. Why is there such a concept in society, if the leader (no matter which society or group) is a bad person, then everyone who is with him or under him is the same.]
Have you heard about good maners attract it kinds while same to evil deeds, if the head is bad, also expect the body thesame way, that's why any bad leader will only be attracted to the group of bar people and a good leader tge same way, they were all birds of thesame feathers.
Why is it that if a person is bad and they start treating him badly, the same attitude automatically relates to his subordinates, because they are not him. How to avoid humiliation in the social sphere if you are good and your boss is bad?
Even the bad people wanted to be treated the good way, if you can't beat them then don't join them, but when you're been trusted in whatever thing you do, it will create a way for you to have peace even while amidst the bad ones.
Why is there such a concept in society, if the leader (no matter which society or group) is a bad person, then everyone who is with him or under him is the same. Why is it that if a person is bad and they start treating him badly, the same attitude automatically relates to his subordinates, because they are not him? How to avoid humiliation in the social sphere if you are good and your boss is bad?
The leader of the government or organization determines the public opinion of the people towards the group. If the leader has a questionable character the public will have a negative view of the organization. In the political setting if the government is corrupt the people will see everyone that is part of the government as untrustworthy. In my country, a particular region of the country is rebelling against the central government because they are marginalized. For a few years now these people have been targeting a killing government officials. They don't care how good such official is because they have tagged all government officials as oppressors.
Also, the leader has the influence to force his followers to do evil. A good man can be influenced by a leader negatively. So the best and only way to avoid this problem is to resign from any organization or government that people believe to be bad. If you perceive that the leader of your organization is not doing the right thing, you have to depart from the place because everybody will think that you are in support or you are also involved in such bad practices.
Leader is the first foundation. if the leader is bad, then automatically everything is bad. therefore, when choosing leaders we must be careful 🙂.
A bad boss when applying for a job can be immediately calculated and judged by what kind of future colleagues you have, as has always been the case, we subordinates copy the behavior of the boss. Therefore, they are judged by the main thing and the rest are simply forced to endure.
There is an expression "the fish rots from the head", therefore, it is not necessary to equalize everyone under one person, but little is understood this way, so if the boss is bad, then everyone under his leadership is like that, because they cannot object to him.
Why is there such a concept in society, if the leader (no matter which society or group) is a bad person, then everyone who is with him or under him is the same. Why is it that if a person is bad and they start treating him badly, the same attitude automatically relates to his subordinates, because they are not him. How to avoid humiliation in the social sphere if you are good and your boss is bad?
Jump to: