Let me say something about how you make your post not the contain of it, Picture is mostly can make it attractive to see while reading since it is long make some spaces enough after each line for it not to look as clog.
ICO sucess depend also on their project marketing success, how they invite and look for investors and how they manage their team and fund, and how they prepare their back-up plans as they consider that they will face some issues in the future, this is the basic concept of a business.
Topic: All truth about ICO! (Read 201 times)
OP if a mod remove this thread you'll have 0 post. lol.
As always advised, ensure you do a proper research on any particular project you find interesting before putting your money in it, some project are just filled with some super sweet lies.
To scam investors through ICO program is very easy days, must investors don't take time to look deep into the project they are investing on, whitepapper only doesn't justify that a particular project is legit.
I have seen a project with a super duper whitepapper, one that looks like it was writing by a Cambridge University professor. You have no reason to doubt the project, but at the long run it turned out to be a great scam!
Always take your time to chat with the team, Not just one, if possible chat with as many as you can, ask them questions and if they can't provide you with a reasonable answers, quit! It your money.
Check their server/domain. You can get their informations here https://www.whois.com
NOTE: must of them will chose to have a private server. Ask questions why is their servers/domain informations hidden.
Do more and more research...
To scam investors through ICO program is very easy days, must investors don't take time to look deep into the project they are investing on, whitepapper only doesn't justify that a particular project is legit.
I have seen a project with a super duper whitepapper, one that looks like it was writing by a Cambridge University professor. You have no reason to doubt the project, but at the long run it turned out to be a great scam!
Always take your time to chat with the team, Not just one, if possible chat with as many as you can, ask them questions and if they can't provide you with a reasonable answers, quit! It your money.
Check their server/domain. You can get their informations here https://www.whois.com
NOTE: must of them will chose to have a private server. Ask questions why is their servers/domain informations hidden.
Do more and more research...
Second topic about ICO in the Meta board. What it has to do with Meta? Should be moved to Altcoin discussion imo. But you want merit for your work, I get it.
You should improve readability, it is difficult to read as presented. Font choice is quite weird, I hope you didn't copy paste it from somewhere.
And tabulation would be nice as well.
As for content, I treat ICO as super high-risky investment, were you need to check carefully everything about the project. And need to diversify your risk by investing in 5-10 ICOs. This is how venture funds do, one good investment could make up for a loss of other 9. Now everybody starting with 0.1 ETH can feel himself in Peter Thiel's shoes.
You should improve readability, it is difficult to read as presented. Font choice is quite weird, I hope you didn't copy paste it from somewhere.
And tabulation would be nice as well.
As for content, I treat ICO as super high-risky investment, were you need to check carefully everything about the project. And need to diversify your risk by investing in 5-10 ICOs. This is how venture funds do, one good investment could make up for a loss of other 9. Now everybody starting with 0.1 ETH can feel himself in Peter Thiel's shoes.
Yes I am a beginner at a forum! But it does not grant to you the right to criticize for writing of this post. If you have doubts concerning me, then I will be glad to you to help with it. The font selected such what it is pleasant to me and let the moderator will decide to leave a post or not. Concerning your output concerning the answer: As "for content, I treat ICO as super high-risky investment, were you need to check carefully everything about the project. And need to diversify your risk by investing in 5-10 ICOs. This is how venture funds do, one good investment could make up for a loss of other 9. Now everybody starting with 0.1 ETH can feel himself in Peter Thiel's shoes." I hurry to notice that that all this shablonno and does not express anything, except emptiness. Good luck!
Hey, I'm far from criticizing your post, just pointed that it hard to read to me, only to me. You're so sensitive! Yes, I'm just a shallow person who have nothing to say, I get it
Just felt it would be offtopic not to comment your writting other than saying THAT IT DOES NOT BELONG HEREDon't take offense at my letter, simply very much it is difficult to inform for you of it as it is not my native language. And you not the small person, you the advanced user also I think the good person!
Second topic about ICO in the Meta board. What it has to do with Meta? Should be moved to Altcoin discussion imo. But you want merit for your work, I get it.
You should improve readability, it is difficult to read as presented. Font choice is quite weird, I hope you didn't copy paste it from somewhere.
And tabulation would be nice as well.
As for content, I treat ICO as super high-risky investment, were you need to check carefully everything about the project. And need to diversify your risk by investing in 5-10 ICOs. This is how venture funds do, one good investment could make up for a loss of other 9. Now everybody starting with 0.1 ETH can feel himself in Peter Thiel's shoes.
You should improve readability, it is difficult to read as presented. Font choice is quite weird, I hope you didn't copy paste it from somewhere.
And tabulation would be nice as well.
As for content, I treat ICO as super high-risky investment, were you need to check carefully everything about the project. And need to diversify your risk by investing in 5-10 ICOs. This is how venture funds do, one good investment could make up for a loss of other 9. Now everybody starting with 0.1 ETH can feel himself in Peter Thiel's shoes.
Yes I am a beginner at a forum! But it does not grant to you the right to criticize for writing of this post. If you have doubts concerning me, then I will be glad to you to help with it. The font selected such what it is pleasant to me and let the moderator will decide to leave a post or not. Concerning your output concerning the answer: As "for content, I treat ICO as super high-risky investment, were you need to check carefully everything about the project. And need to diversify your risk by investing in 5-10 ICOs. This is how venture funds do, one good investment could make up for a loss of other 9. Now everybody starting with 0.1 ETH can feel himself in Peter Thiel's shoes." I hurry to notice that that all this shablonno and does not express anything, except emptiness. Good luck!
Hey, I'm far from criticizing your post, just pointed that it hard to read to me, only to me. You're so sensitive! Yes, I'm just a shallow person who have nothing to say, I get it
Just felt it would be offtopic not to comment your writting other than saying THAT IT DOES NOT BELONG HEREThanks for your notes! I apologize for the text)
Second topic about ICO in the Meta board. What it has to do with Meta? Should be moved to Altcoin discussion imo. But you want merit for your work, I get it.
You should improve readability, it is difficult to read as presented. Font choice is quite weird, I hope you didn't copy paste it from somewhere.
And tabulation would be nice as well.
As for content, I treat ICO as super high-risky investment, were you need to check carefully everything about the project. And need to diversify your risk by investing in 5-10 ICOs. This is how venture funds do, one good investment could make up for a loss of other 9. Now everybody starting with 0.1 ETH can feel himself in Peter Thiel's shoes.
You should improve readability, it is difficult to read as presented. Font choice is quite weird, I hope you didn't copy paste it from somewhere.
And tabulation would be nice as well.
As for content, I treat ICO as super high-risky investment, were you need to check carefully everything about the project. And need to diversify your risk by investing in 5-10 ICOs. This is how venture funds do, one good investment could make up for a loss of other 9. Now everybody starting with 0.1 ETH can feel himself in Peter Thiel's shoes.
Yes I am a beginner at a forum! But it does not grant to you the right to criticize for writing of this post. If you have doubts concerning me, then I will be glad to you to help with it. The font selected such what it is pleasant to me and let the moderator will decide to leave a post or not. Concerning your output concerning the answer: As "for content, I treat ICO as super high-risky investment, were you need to check carefully everything about the project. And need to diversify your risk by investing in 5-10 ICOs. This is how venture funds do, one good investment could make up for a loss of other 9. Now everybody starting with 0.1 ETH can feel himself in Peter Thiel's shoes." I hurry to notice that that all this shablonno and does not express anything, except emptiness. Good luck!
Hey, I'm far from criticizing your post, just pointed that it hard to read to me, only to me. You're so sensitive! Yes, I'm just a shallow person who have nothing to say, I get it
Just felt it would be offtopic not to comment your writting other than saying THAT IT DOES NOT BELONG HERE Second topic about ICO in the Meta board. What it has to do with Meta? Should be moved to Altcoin discussion imo. But you want merit for your work, I get it.
You should improve readability, it is difficult to read as presented. Font choice is quite weird, I hope you didn't copy paste it from somewhere.
And tabulation would be nice as well.
As for content, I treat ICO as super high-risky investment, were you need to check carefully everything about the project. And need to diversify your risk by investing in 5-10 ICOs. This is how venture funds do, one good investment could make up for a loss of other 9. Now everybody starting with 0.1 ETH can feel himself in Peter Thiel's shoes.
You should improve readability, it is difficult to read as presented. Font choice is quite weird, I hope you didn't copy paste it from somewhere.
And tabulation would be nice as well.
As for content, I treat ICO as super high-risky investment, were you need to check carefully everything about the project. And need to diversify your risk by investing in 5-10 ICOs. This is how venture funds do, one good investment could make up for a loss of other 9. Now everybody starting with 0.1 ETH can feel himself in Peter Thiel's shoes.
Yes I am a beginner at a forum! But it does not grant to you the right to criticize for writing of this post. If you have doubts concerning me, then I will be glad to you to help with it. The font selected such what it is pleasant to me and let the moderator will decide to leave a post or not. Concerning your output concerning the answer: As "for content, I treat ICO as super high-risky investment, were you need to check carefully everything about the project. And need to diversify your risk by investing in 5-10 ICOs. This is how venture funds do, one good investment could make up for a loss of other 9. Now everybody starting with 0.1 ETH can feel himself in Peter Thiel's shoes." I hurry to notice that that all this too as always write and does not express anything, except emptiness. Good luck!
Second topic about ICO in the Meta board. What it has to do with Meta? Should be moved to Altcoin discussion imo. But you want merit for your work, I get it.
You should improve readability, it is difficult to read as presented. Font choice is quite weird, I hope you didn't copy paste it from somewhere.
And tabulation would be nice as well.
As for content, I treat ICO as super high-risky investment, were you need to check carefully everything about the project. And need to diversify your risk by investing in 5-10 ICOs. This is how venture funds do, one good investment could make up for a loss of other 9. Now everybody starting with 0.1 ETH can feel himself in Peter Thiel's shoes.
You should improve readability, it is difficult to read as presented. Font choice is quite weird, I hope you didn't copy paste it from somewhere.
And tabulation would be nice as well.
As for content, I treat ICO as super high-risky investment, were you need to check carefully everything about the project. And need to diversify your risk by investing in 5-10 ICOs. This is how venture funds do, one good investment could make up for a loss of other 9. Now everybody starting with 0.1 ETH can feel himself in Peter Thiel's shoes.
Every single thing in the world has two sides. And considering the second side would be the same by just knowing about the first side is totally senseless.
There are hundreds of projects coming up every month. Thousands of them every year. None of them ask the investors to believe in them with no reason, nor the investors are blind-folded. If you want to invest your money into a project, it is your responsibility to do your research about them to make sure that you are not investing them into something that doesn't really have any core but is just a structure built with outer beauty. And if you don't do that, you are the only one to be blamed if it turns a scam and runs away with the money.
You can't blame a complete industry if only a few of its projects are not genuine of legit.
P.S: ICO stands for Initial Coin Offering.
There are hundreds of projects coming up every month. Thousands of them every year. None of them ask the investors to believe in them with no reason, nor the investors are blind-folded. If you want to invest your money into a project, it is your responsibility to do your research about them to make sure that you are not investing them into something that doesn't really have any core but is just a structure built with outer beauty. And if you don't do that, you are the only one to be blamed if it turns a scam and runs away with the money.
You can't blame a complete industry if only a few of its projects are not genuine of legit.
P.S: ICO stands for Initial Coin Offering.
In your words there is a rational grain! But alas the severe reality goes on only one, any audit and no what researches give 100% of a guarantee, that the next pseudo-projects for themselves will have the future. The most important for the investor not to lose the enclosed investments and especially reputation.
Every single thing in the world has two sides. And considering the second side would be the same by just knowing about the first side is totally senseless.
There are hundreds of projects coming up every month. Thousands of them every year. None of them ask the investors to believe in them with no reason, nor the investors are blind-folded. If you want to invest your money into a project, it is your responsibility to do your research about them to make sure that you are not investing them into something that doesn't really have any core but is just a structure built with outer beauty. And if you don't do that, you are the only one to be blamed if it turns a scam and runs away with the money.
You can't blame a complete industry if only a few of its projects are not genuine of legit.
P.S: ICO stands for Initial Coin Offering.
There are hundreds of projects coming up every month. Thousands of them every year. None of them ask the investors to believe in them with no reason, nor the investors are blind-folded. If you want to invest your money into a project, it is your responsibility to do your research about them to make sure that you are not investing them into something that doesn't really have any core but is just a structure built with outer beauty. And if you don't do that, you are the only one to be blamed if it turns a scam and runs away with the money.
You can't blame a complete industry if only a few of its projects are not genuine of legit.
P.S: ICO stands for Initial Coin Offering.
Write that you think about it! Good luck!
I welcome you inhabitants of a forum
You thought earlier as new altkoin, fork' and shitkoin are born.
Most of them appear boring budding. And Earlier it was natural and normal business for the cryptoworld. Though it is very banal and is not sexual at all!
Now, these shitkoina appear, only as a fruit of great and "pure" love.
Besides really love group and with special perversions.
Developers-devy of a new cryptotoken, large whales investors and crypto-hamsters who perform as an object of that perverted love with sadistic elements participate in such orgy.
Cryptohamsters are torn up in turn by developers and whales. Tear up inventively, perverted
and with imagination.
Such orgy even received the own name - ICO. Initial placement of coins.
Technically it looks so:
Developer decided to collect to himself money. For this purpose he creates the new project, calls it a beautiful and mysterious word. Then writes white paper. It something like the business plan, but only for mentally retarded people. In it he promises that all will be a bunch, it shittoken it is new bitcoin which will cost a huge cloud money.
Then he convokes the friends and familiar investors. Also speaks to them, I will produce one billion tokens now. From which I will keep a half, I will sell a part to you for cheap, from 50% a discount. And I will merge the rest to hamsters for both cheeks, at the predatory price.
As soon as I finish collecting of bucks from hamsters, we amicably merge the tokens at ICO price. Hamsters who did not manage to purchase this shittoken on ICO with greed will gather it to themselves already at the exchange. And then for years to wait for a tuzemun.
We buy to ourselves abrupt wheelbarrows, islands and cryptowhores.
But one more thing is necessary for us for successful implementation of the plan, we need a photo with Vitalik (Buterin)
Photo
In a traditional business case if reputable company suddenly wants to increase the capitalization, namely podzanyat a money at investors and to bring the events to the exchange, it has to pass very long way, the state financial bodies so far checking and controlling will not permit to carry out by her the IPO (Initial public offering). All this costs a lot of money. But at least partially protects the interests of investors.
The wild West reigns in the cryptoworld so far. To consider for fools of investors here in the nature of things. But it, sometimes, are compensated by big profits. ICO is the most convenient method of a whip-round from around the world even under the most mad idea. Therefore not to stop a flow of new ICO any more!
Among hundreds there is future ICO, there are good, and fair projects. Which will enrich the investors and will even create new progressive revolutionary technologies and products. But they are not enough. Most ICO are created for speculation and a simple bablasbor. So be always alert! And before you will invest the blood bitcoins in the next ICO hundred times think. Then not to become the bagholder forced by the long-term investor well or simple words the underdog and the sucker.
Most of them appear boring budding. And Earlier it was natural and normal business for the cryptoworld. Though it is very banal and is not sexual at all!
Now, these shitkoina appear, only as a fruit of great and "pure" love.
Besides really love group and with special perversions.
Developers-devy of a new cryptotoken, large whales investors and crypto-hamsters who perform as an object of that perverted love with sadistic elements participate in such orgy.
Cryptohamsters are torn up in turn by developers and whales. Tear up inventively, perverted
and with imagination.
Such orgy even received the own name - ICO. Initial placement of coins.
Technically it looks so:
Developer decided to collect to himself money. For this purpose he creates the new project, calls it a beautiful and mysterious word. Then writes white paper. It something like the business plan, but only for mentally retarded people. In it he promises that all will be a bunch, it shittoken it is new bitcoin which will cost a huge cloud money.
Then he convokes the friends and familiar investors. Also speaks to them, I will produce one billion tokens now. From which I will keep a half, I will sell a part to you for cheap, from 50% a discount. And I will merge the rest to hamsters for both cheeks, at the predatory price.
As soon as I finish collecting of bucks from hamsters, we amicably merge the tokens at ICO price. Hamsters who did not manage to purchase this shittoken on ICO with greed will gather it to themselves already at the exchange. And then for years to wait for a tuzemun.
We buy to ourselves abrupt wheelbarrows, islands and cryptowhores.
But one more thing is necessary for us for successful implementation of the plan, we need a photo with Vitalik (Buterin)
Photo
In a traditional business case if reputable company suddenly wants to increase the capitalization, namely podzanyat a money at investors and to bring the events to the exchange, it has to pass very long way, the state financial bodies so far checking and controlling will not permit to carry out by her the IPO (Initial public offering). All this costs a lot of money. But at least partially protects the interests of investors.
The wild West reigns in the cryptoworld so far. To consider for fools of investors here in the nature of things. But it, sometimes, are compensated by big profits. ICO is the most convenient method of a whip-round from around the world even under the most mad idea. Therefore not to stop a flow of new ICO any more!
Among hundreds there is future ICO, there are good, and fair projects. Which will enrich the investors and will even create new progressive revolutionary technologies and products. But they are not enough. Most ICO are created for speculation and a simple bablasbor. So be always alert! And before you will invest the blood bitcoins in the next ICO hundred times think. Then not to become the bagholder forced by the long-term investor well or simple words the underdog and the sucker.
Jump to: